Skip to main content

Sensitivity Analysis of BCC Efficiency in DEA with Application to European Health Services

Part of the Operations Research Proceedings book series (ORP)

Abstract

The CCR model by Charnes et al. [4] on the one hand and BCC model by Banker et al. [3] on the other hand are the most common used approaches of data envelopment analysis (DEA). If we measure efficiency of decision making units (DMUs) by the BCC model, technology is characterized by variable returns to scale. If the inputs and outputs of a DMU are scaled by two parameters such that the BCC (in)efficiency score is unchanged we call this adaptation a bicentric scaling (BS). We introduce a linear program to calculate the BS stability region of all DMUs, efficient or inefficient. Moreover we determine the scale efficiency within the stability region. The new approach is illustrated by a numerical example of European health services. We demonstrate the BS stability region for various states and illustrate consequences on scale efficiency. It is shown that some states can improve scale efficiency without losing BCC efficiency.

Keywords

  • Data Envelopment Analysis
  • Efficiency Score
  • Constant Return
  • Variable Return
  • Scale Efficiency

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07001-8_33
  • Chapter length: 6 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-07001-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1

References

  1. Alexander, C. A., Busch, G., & Stringer, K. (2003). Implementing and interpreting a data envelopment analysis model to assess the efficiency of health systems in developing countries. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 14, 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Banker, R. D. (1984). Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 17, 35–44

    Google Scholar 

  3. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiences in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. EJOR, 2, 429–444.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Lewin, A. Y., Morey, R. C., Rousseau, J. (1985). Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA. Annals OR, 2, 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charnes, A., Rousseau, J., Semple, J. (1996). Sensitivity and stability analysis of efficiency classifications in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7, 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper, W. W., Li, S., Seiford, L. M., Tone, K., Thrall, R. M., Zhu, J. (2001). Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA: Some recent developments. Journal of Production Analysis, 15, 217–246.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis—A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver software. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dellnitz, A., Kleine, A., & Rödder, W. (2012). Ökonomische Interpretationen der Skalenvariablen u in der DEA. Diskussionsbeitrag der Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaft: FernUniversität in Hagen. 480.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B. R., & Tavares, G. (2008). Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholary literature in DEA. Journal of Socio-Economic Planning Science, 42, 151–157.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Jahanshahloo, G. R., Hosseinzadeh, F., Shoja, N., Sanei, M., Tohidi, G. (2005). Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 169, 897–904.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kleine, A. (2004), A general model framework for DEA. Omega, 32, 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Puig-Junoy, J. (1998). Measuring health production performance in the OECD. Applied Economics Letters, 5, 255–259.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organisation. (2012). World Heath Statistics 2012. Geneva: WHO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu, J. (1996). Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis. EJOR, 90, 451–460.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Kleine .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kleine, A., Dellnitz, A., Rödder, W. (2014). Sensitivity Analysis of BCC Efficiency in DEA with Application to European Health Services. In: Huisman, D., Louwerse, I., Wagelmans, A. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2013. Operations Research Proceedings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07001-8_33

Download citation