Advertisement

Mesoscale Simulations of Dry Sand

  • Merit G. SchumakerEmail author
  • John P. Borg
  • Gregory Kennedy
  • Naresh N. Thadhani
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

There is an interest in producing accurate and reliable computer simulations to predict the dynamic behavior of heterogeneous materials and to use these simulations to gain further insight into experimental results. In so doing, a more complete understanding of the multiple-length scale involved in heterogeneous material compaction can be obtained. In this work, planar shock impact experiments were simulated using two different hydrocode formulations: iSALE and CTH. The simulations, which were based on a Georgia Tech experimental setup, consisted of a flyer of varying thickness impacting dry sand over a range of impact. Particle velocity traces obtained from the computer simulations were compared to VISAR and PDV measurements obtained from experiments. The mesoscale simulations compare well with the dynamic behavior of dry sand. Improvements on these simulations with the inclusion of these mesoscale phenomena are presented and discussed.

Keywords

Impact testing Granular materials Heterogeneous material Simulation Mesoscale 

References

  1. 1.
    Chapman DJ, Tsembelis K, Proud WG (2006) Proceedings of the 2006 SEM annual conference and exposition, St. Louis, 4–7 June 2006Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van Theil M (1966) Compendium of shock wave data. California University, California, UCRL=50108Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dianov MD, Zlatin NA, Mochaloc SM, Pugachev GS, Rosomakho LKH (1976) Sov Tech Phys Lett 2(6):207–208Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown JL, Vogler TJ, Grady DE, Reinhart WD, Chhabildas LC, Thornhill TF (2007) Shock compression of condensed matter-2007. In: Proceedings of the conference of the American physical society topical group on shock compression of condensed matter. AIP conference proceedings, vol 955. American Institute of Physics, pp 1363–1366Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Swegle JW, Grady DE (1985) J Appl Phys 58:692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wackerle I (1962) Shock compression of quartz. J Appl Phys 33(3):922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grady DE (1980) J Geophys Res 85(B2):913–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Borg JP, Vogler TJ (2009) The effect of water content on the shock compaction of sand. In: DYMAT, Brussels, Belgium, pp 1545–1551Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Borg JP, Vogler TJ (2008) Int J Solids Struct 45:1676–1696CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marsh S (1980) LASL Shock Hugoniot Data. University of California Press, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Asay JR, Shahinpoor M (1993) High-pressure shock compression of solids. Springer-Verlag, New York 222:379–382Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kerley GI (1999) Equations of state for composite materials. Kerley Publishing Services report KPS99-4, December 1999Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Trunin RF (1998) Shock compression of condensed materials. Cambridge Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Online Materials Information Resource – MatWeb. N.p., n.d. 27 Feb 2014Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Root S, Assay JR (2009) Loading path and rate dependence of inelastic deformation: x-cut quartz. J Appl Phys 106(5):056104-1–056104-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schroeder DV (2000) An introduction to thermal physics. Addison-Wesley, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Collins G, Davison T (2006) iSALE (impact-SALE) A multi-material extension of the SALE hydrocode (simplified arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian). Available from http://www.isale-code.de/
  18. 18.
    Amsden A, Ruppel H, Hirt C (1980) SALE: a simplified ALE computer program for fluid flow at all speeds. Los Alamos National Laboratories Report, LA-8095: 101p. LANL, Los Alamos, New MexicoGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    CTH Hydrocode Version 10.2, February 2012Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vogler TJ, Borg JP, Grady DE (2012) On the scaling of steady structured waves in heterogeneous materials. J Appl Phys 112:123507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vogler TJ, Lee MY, Grady DE (2007) Int J Solids Struct 44:636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zaretsky E, Asaf ER, Azik F (2012) Int J Impact Eng 39:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Neal WD, Chapman DJ, Proud WG (2012) Shock compression of condensed matter-2011. In: Elert ML et al (eds) Proceedings of the conference of the American physical society topical group on shock compression of condensed matter. AIP conference proceedings, vol 1426. American Institute of Physics, pp 1443–1446Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sheffield SA, Gustavsen RL, Anderson MU (1997) Shock loading of porous high explosives. In: Davison L, Horie Y, Shahinpoor M (eds) High pressure shock compression of solids IV: response of highly porous solids to shock loading. Springer, New York, pp 23–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Anderson MU, Holman GT, Graham RA (1994) Time-resolved shock compression of porous rutile: wave dispersion in porous solids. In: Schmidt SC et al (eds) High pressure science and technology. American Institute of Physics, NY, pp 1111–1114Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Merit G. Schumaker
    • 1
    Email author
  • John P. Borg
    • 1
  • Gregory Kennedy
    • 2
  • Naresh N. Thadhani
    • 2
  1. 1.Marquette UniversityMilwaukeeUSA
  2. 2.Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations