Advertisement

Hydrogen Embrittlement and “Cold Fusion” Effects in Palladium During Electrolysis Experiments

  • A. CarpinteriEmail author
  • O. Borla
  • A. Goi
  • S. Guastella
  • A. Manuello
  • D. Veneziano
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

Recent experiments provided evidence of piezonuclear reactions occurring in condensed matter during fracture of solids, cavitation of liquids, and electrolysis. These experiments were characterized by significant neutron and alpha particle emissions, together with appreciable variations in the chemical composition. A mechanical reason for the so-called Cold Nuclear Fusion was recently proposed by the authors. The hydrogen embrittlement due to H atoms produced by the electrolysis plays an essential role for the observed microcracking in the electrode host metals (Pd, Ni, Fe, etc.). Consequently, our hypothesis is that piezonuclear fission reactions may occur in correspondence to the microcrack formation. In order to confirm the first results obtained by Co-Cr and Ni-Fe electrodes, electrolytic tests have been conducted using 100 % Pd at the cathode. As a result, relevant compositional changes and traces of elements previously absent have been observed on the Pd and Ni-Fe electrodes after the experiments and significant neutron emissions were observed during the test.

Keywords

Hydrogen embrittlement Cold fusion Electrolysis Piezonuclear reactions Neutron emission 

References

  1. 1.
    Borghi DC, Giori DC, Dall’Olio A (1992) Experimental evidence on the emission of neutrons from cold hydrogen plasma. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on few-body problems in low-energy physics, Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, pp 147–154; Unpublished Communication (1957); Comunicacao n. 25 do CENUFPE, Recife Brazil (1971)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Diebner K (1962) Fusionsprozesse mit Hilfe konvergenter Stosswellen – einige aeltere und neuere Versuche und Ueberlegungen. Kerntechnik 3:89–93Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaliski S (1978) Bi-conical system of concentric explosive compression of D-T. J Tech Phys 19:283–289MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Winterberg F (1984) Autocatalytic fusion–fission implosions. Atomenergie-Kerntechnik 44:146Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Derjaguin BV et al (1989) Titanium fracture yields neutrons? Nature 34:492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fleischmann M, Pons S, Hawkins M (1989) Electrochemically induced nuclear fusion of deuterium. J Electroanal Chem 261:301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bockris JO’M, Lin GH, Kainthla RC, Packham NJC, Velev O (1990) Does tritium form at electrodes by nuclear reactions? In: The first annual conference on cold fusion. National Cold Fusion Institute, University of Utah Research Park, Salt Lake CityGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Preparata G (1991) Some theories of cold fusion: a review. Fusion Technol 20:82Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Preparata G (1991) A new look at solid-state fractures, particle emissions and “cold” nuclear fusion. Il Nuovo Cimento 104A:1259–1263Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mills RL, Kneizys P (1991) Excess heat production by the electrolysis of an aqueous potassium carbonate electrolyte and the implications for cold fusion. Fusion Technol 20:65Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Notoya R, Enyo M (1992) Excess heat production during electrolysis of H2O on Ni, Au, Ag and Sn electrodes in alkaline media. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on cold fusion, Nagoya, Japan. Universal Academy Press, Inc., Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miles MH, Hollins RA, Bush BF, Lagowski JJ, Miles RE (1993) Correlation of excess power and helium production during D2O and H2O electrolysis using palladium cathodes. J Electroanal Chem vol 346:99–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bush RT, Eagleton RD (1993) Calorimetric studies for several light water electrolytic cells with nickel fibrex cathodes and electrolytes with alkali salts of potassium, rubidium, and cesium. In: Fourth international conference on cold fusion. Lahaina, Maui. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fleischmann M, Pons S, Preparata G (1994) Possible theories of cold fusion. Nuovo Cimento Soc Ital Fis A 107:143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Szpak S, Mosier-Boss PA, Smith JJ (1994) Deuterium uptake during Pd-D codeposition. J Electroanal Chem 379:121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sundaresan R, Bockris JOM (1994) Anomalous reactions during arcing between carbon rods in water. Fusion Technol 26:261Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Arata Y, Zhang Y (1995) Achievement of solid-state plasma fusion (“cold-fusion”). Proc Jpn Acad 71(Ser. B):304–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ohmori T, Mizuno T, Enyo M (1996) Isotopic distributions of heavy metal elements produced during the light water electrolysis on gold electrodes. J New Energy 1(3):90Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Monti RA (1996) Low energy nuclear reactions: experimental evidence for the alpha extended model of the atom. J New Energy 1(3):131MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Monti RA (1998) Nuclear transmutation processes of lead, silver, thorium, uranium. In: The seventh international conference on cold fusion. ENECO Inc., Vancouver, Canada; Salt Lake City, UTGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ohmori T, Mizuno T (1998) Strong excess energy evolution, new element production, and electromagnetic wave and/or neutron emission in light water electrolysis with a tungsten cathode. Infinite Energy 20:14–17Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mizuno T (1998) Nuclear transmutation: the reality of cold fusion. Infinite Energy Press, ConcordGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Little SR, Puthoff HE, Little ME (1998) Search for excess heat from a Pt electrode discharge in K2CO3-H2O and K2CO3-D2O electrolytesGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ohmori T, Mizuno T (1999) Nuclear transmutation reaction caused by light water electrolysis on tungsten cathode under incandescent conditions. Infinite Energy 5(27):34Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ransford HE (1999) Non-stellar nucleosynthesis: transition metal production by DC plasma-discharge electrolysis using carbon electrodes in a non-metallic cell. Infinite Energy 4(23):16Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Storms E (2000) Excess power production from platinum cathodes using the Pons-Fleischmann effect. In: 8th international conference on cold fusion. Lerici (La Spezia). Italian Physical Society, Bologna, Italy, pp 55–61Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Storms E (2007) Science of low energy nuclear reaction: a comprehensive compilation of evidence and explanations about cold fusion. World Scientific, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mizuno T et al (2000) Production of heat during plasma electrolysis. Jpn J Appl Phys A 39:6055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Warner J, Dash J, Frantz S (2002) Electrolysis of D2O with titanium cathodes: enhancement of excess heat and further evidence of possible transmutation. In: The ninth international conference on cold fusion. Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, p 404Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fujii MF et al (2002) Neutron emission from fracture of piezoelectric materials in deuterium atmosphere. Jpn J Appl Phys 41:2115–2119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mosier-Boss PA et al (2007) Use of CR-39 in Pd/D co-deposition experiments. Eur Phys J Appl Phys 40:293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Swartz M (2008) Three physical regions of anomalous activity in deuterated palladium. Infinite Energy 14:19–31Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mosier-Boss PA et al (2010) Comparison of Pd/D co-deposition and DT neutron generated triple tracks observed in CR-39 detectors. Eur Phys J Appl Phys 51(2):20901–20911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kanarev M, Mizuno T (2002) Cold fusion by plasma electrolysis of water. New Energy Technol 1:5–10Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cardone F, Mignani R (2004) Energy and geometry. World Scientific, Singapore, Chap. 10zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Carpinteri A, Cardone F, Lacidogna G (2009) Piezonuclear neutrons from brittle fracture: early results of mechanical compression tests. Strain 45:332–339. (2009) Atti dell’Accademia delle Scienze di Torino 33:27–42Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cardone F, Carpinteri A, Lacidogna G (2009) Piezonuclear neutrons from fracturing of inert solids. Phys Lett A 373:4158–4163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Carpinteri A, Cardone F, Lacidogna G (2010) Energy emissions from failure phenomena: mechanical, electromagnetic, nuclear. Exp Mech 50:1235–1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Carpinteri A, Lacidogna G, Manuello A, Borla O (2012) Piezonuclear fission reactions: evidences from microchemical analysis, neutron emission, and geological transformation. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:445–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Carpinteri A, Lacidogna G, Manuello A, Borla O (2013) Piezonuclear fission reactions from earthquakes and brittle rocks failure: evidence of neutron emission and nonradioactive product elements. Exp Mech 53:345–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Milne I, Ritchie RO, Karihaloo B (2003) Comprehensive structural integrity: fracture of materials from nano to macro, vol 6. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 31–33, Chapter 6.02Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Liebowitz H (1971) Fracture an advanced treatise. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Carpinteri A, Borla O, Goi A, Manuello A, Veneziano D (2013) Mechanical conjectures explaining cold nuclear fusion. In: Proceedings of the conference and exposition on experimental and applied mechanics (SEM), Lombard, Illinois, CD-ROM, Paper N. 481Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Veneziano D, Borla O, Goi A, Manuello A, Carpinteri A (2013) Mechanical conjectures based on hydrogen embrittlement explaining cold nuclear fusion. In: Proceedings of the 21° congresso nazionale di meccanica teorica ed applicata (AIMETA), Torino, Italy, CD-ROMGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Carpinteri
    • 1
    Email author
  • O. Borla
    • 1
  • A. Goi
    • 2
  • S. Guastella
    • 3
  • A. Manuello
    • 1
  • D. Veneziano
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Structural, Geotechnical and Building EngineeringPolitecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly
  2. 2.TorinoItaly
  3. 3.Department of Applied Science and Technology, Geotechnical and Building EngineeringPolitecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations