Skip to main content

Incremental Ring Core by Optical Methods: Preliminary Results

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Experimental and Applied Mechanics, Volume 6

Abstract

The ring core method is a well-known technique for residual stress measuring. It consists of milling a circular ring around the point of interest and measuring the surface deformations of the core. The method is more sensitive than hole drilling, but its sensitivity decreases with depth to become null when ring depth is equal to one third of the diameter. To overcome this problem, in literature an incremental version of the technique has been proposed consisting of removing the core, re-installing the strain gauge rosette and re-performing the measurement. Although the idea is interesting, its practical implementation is quite difficult, in particular re-installing the rosette is almost impossible when depth becomes significant, thus the incremental measurement is never performed.

In this work we propose to replace the strain gauge rosette with an optical technique. In this way the incremental approach becomes viable, even though, depending on the optical technique used, some practical problems have to be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Actually the required magnification is not significantly larger. Indeed, in the ring-core method the active area is the core, which should fill the imaged area, whereas in hole-drilling no theoretical limitation exists, but displacements decay rapidly with distance from the axis of the hole, thus imaging more than 5–6 diameters is practically useless.

  2. 2.

    Using moiré interferometry is obviously impossible. Indeed, using this technique would simply move the problem from gluing the rosette to replicating a grating at the bottom of a deep hole.

  3. 3.

    Note that also the optical strain rosette presents significant problems: indeed, it requires micro-indenting the surface at the bottom of the hole; moreover the diffracted beams quite probably will be blocked by the lateral surface of the hole.

  4. 4.

    Note that all previous phase fields result from the subtraction of current phase from the reference one (i.e. the phase field of the original surface). Because we removed the core, we had to shift the reference field, which now corresponds to the bottom of the hole at 2.8 mm depth.

References

  1. ASTM E1426 98(2009)e1 Standard test method for determining the effective elastic parameter for x-ray diffraction measurements of residual stress. Tech. rep., American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 1998. doi:10.1520/E1426-98R09E01

  2. ASTM E837-08e1 Standard test method for determining residual stresses by the hole-drilling strain-gage method. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 2008. doi:10.1520/E0837-08E01

  3. Baldi A (2005) A new analytical approach for hole drilling residual stress analysis by full field method. J Eng Mater Technol 127(2):165–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Focht G, Schiffner K (2002) Numerical processing of measured full-field dis-placement data around holes for residual stress determination. In: Mang HA, Rammerstorfer FG, Eberhrdsteiner J (eds) Fifth World Congress on Computational Mechanics, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lin ST, Hsieh CT, Lee CK (2005) Full field phase-shifting holographic blind-hole techniques for in-plane residual stress detection. In: Honda T (ed) Int. Conf. on Applications of Optical Holography, Bellingham, Washington, Proceedings of SPIE, vol 2577, 226–237

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ponslet E, Steinzig M (2003) Residual stress measurement using the hole drilling method and laser speckle interferometry part ii: analysis technique. Exp Tech 27(4):17–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li K, Ren W (2007) Application of Minature ring-core and interferometric strain/slope rosette to determine residual stress distribution with depth. Part I: Theories. J Appl Mech 74(2):298–306

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Ren W, Li K (2007) Application of miniature ring-core and interferometric strain/slope rosette to determine residual stress distribution with depth. Part II: experiments. J Appl Mech 74(2):307–314

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Bender N, Hofer G, Lenz O, Stücker E (1979) Method of determining internal stresses in structural members, U.S. Patent no. 4155264

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Baldi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baldi, A., Bertolino, F. (2015). Incremental Ring Core by Optical Methods: Preliminary Results. In: Sottos, N., Rowlands, R., Dannemann, K. (eds) Experimental and Applied Mechanics, Volume 6. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06989-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06989-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06988-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06989-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics