Advertisement

Incremental Ring Core by Optical Methods: Preliminary Results

  • Antonio BaldiEmail author
  • Filippo Bertolino
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

The ring core method is a well-known technique for residual stress measuring. It consists of milling a circular ring around the point of interest and measuring the surface deformations of the core. The method is more sensitive than hole drilling, but its sensitivity decreases with depth to become null when ring depth is equal to one third of the diameter. To overcome this problem, in literature an incremental version of the technique has been proposed consisting of removing the core, re-installing the strain gauge rosette and re-performing the measurement. Although the idea is interesting, its practical implementation is quite difficult, in particular re-installing the rosette is almost impossible when depth becomes significant, thus the incremental measurement is never performed.

In this work we propose to replace the strain gauge rosette with an optical technique. In this way the incremental approach becomes viable, even though, depending on the optical technique used, some practical problems have to be addressed.

Keywords

Residual stress Ring core In-plane sensitive speckle interferometry Reverse method 

References

  1. 1.
    ASTM E1426 98(2009)e1 Standard test method for determining the effective elastic parameter for x-ray diffraction measurements of residual stress. Tech. rep., American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 1998. doi: 10.1520/E1426-98R09E01
  2. 2.
    ASTM E837-08e1 Standard test method for determining residual stresses by the hole-drilling strain-gage method. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 2008. doi: 10.1520/E0837-08E01
  3. 3.
    Baldi A (2005) A new analytical approach for hole drilling residual stress analysis by full field method. J Eng Mater Technol 127(2):165–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Focht G, Schiffner K (2002) Numerical processing of measured full-field dis-placement data around holes for residual stress determination. In: Mang HA, Rammerstorfer FG, Eberhrdsteiner J (eds) Fifth World Congress on Computational Mechanics, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lin ST, Hsieh CT, Lee CK (2005) Full field phase-shifting holographic blind-hole techniques for in-plane residual stress detection. In: Honda T (ed) Int. Conf. on Applications of Optical Holography, Bellingham, Washington, Proceedings of SPIE, vol 2577, 226–237Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ponslet E, Steinzig M (2003) Residual stress measurement using the hole drilling method and laser speckle interferometry part ii: analysis technique. Exp Tech 27(4):17–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li K, Ren W (2007) Application of Minature ring-core and interferometric strain/slope rosette to determine residual stress distribution with depth. Part I: Theories. J Appl Mech 74(2):298–306CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ren W, Li K (2007) Application of miniature ring-core and interferometric strain/slope rosette to determine residual stress distribution with depth. Part II: experiments. J Appl Mech 74(2):307–314CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bender N, Hofer G, Lenz O, Stücker E (1979) Method of determining internal stresses in structural members, U.S. Patent no. 4155264Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, Chimica e dei MaterialiUniversità degli Studi di CagliariCagliariItaly

Personalised recommendations