Skip to main content

Genetically Engineered Crops and Rural Society

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2739 Accesses

Abstract

This paper seeks to contribute to the genetically engineered crop debates by exploring some social dimensions of new agricultural technologies. After assessing the social dimensions of current GE crops as they relate to agricultural research and development, we examine issues related to farmer adoption of GE crops. We conclude with a discussion on obstacles to socially equitable agricultural innovation and potential policy solutions. We contend that failing to consider these social dimensions of technology development and diffusion are likely to generate unforeseen problems and unsustainable technological developments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chang H (2008) Bad Samaritans: the myth of free trade and the secret history of capitalism. Bloomsbury Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • De Schutter O, Vanloqueren G (2011) The new green revolution: how twenty-first century science can feed the world. Solutions 2(4):33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenson RE, Gollin D (2003) Assessing the impact of the green revolution. Science 300(5620):758–762

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuglie K, Heisey P, King J, Pray CE, Schimmelpfennig D (2012) The contribution of private industry to agricultural innovation. Science 338(6110):1031–1032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh P (2003) India’s GM seed piracy. BBC News, 17 June 2003 (Downloaded 5 Dec 2013: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2998150.stm)

  • Glenna LL, Cahoy DR (2009) Agribusiness concentration, intellectual property, and the prospects for rural economic benefits from the emerging biofuel economy. South Rural Sociol 24(2):111–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenna LL, Welsh R, Ervin D, Lacy WB, Biscotti D (2011) Commercial science, scientists’ values, and university biotechnology research agenda. Res Policy 40(7):957–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James C (2012) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2012. ISAAA briefs no. 44. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinchy A (2012) Seeds, science and struggle: the global politics of transgenic crops. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman DL, Vallas SP (2001) Science, capitalism, and the rise of the ‘Knowledge Worker’: the changing structure of knowledge production in the United States. Theory Soc 30:451–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mkandawire T (2001) Thinking about developmental states in Africa. Camb J Econ 25(3):289–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moseley WG, Carney J, Becker L (2010) Neoliberal policy, rural livelihoods, and urban food security in West Africa: a comparative study of the Gambia, Cote d/Ivoire, and Mali. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(13):5774–5779

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (2010) Impacts of genetically-engineered crops on farm sustainability in the United States. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardey PG, Alston JM (2010) U.S. agricultural research in a Global Food Security setting. Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechlaner G (2012) Corporate crops: biotechnology, agriculture, and the struggle for control. University of Texas Press, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Potrykus I (2001) Golden rice and beyond. Plant Physiol 125(3):1157–1161

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potrykus I (2010) Regulation must be revolutionized. Nature 466:561

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qaim M (2009) The economics of genetically modified crops. Annu Rev Resour Econ 1:665–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein H (2005) Intellectual property and genetically modified seeds: the United States, trade, and the developing world. Northwest J Technol Intellect Prop 3(2):160–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokstad E (2008) Dueling visions for a hungry world. Science 319:1474–1476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stone GD (2002) Both sides now: fallacies in the genetic-modification wars, implications for developing countries, and anthropological perspectives. Curr Anthropol 43(4):611–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatge M (2004) Piracy on the high plains. Forbes, 4 Dec 2004 (Downloaded 6 Dec 2013: http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2004/0412/135.html)

  • Welsh R, Glenna LL (2006) Considering the role of the university in conducting research on agri-biotechnologies. Soc Stud Sci 36(6):929–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leland Glenna .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glenna, L., Jones, K. (2014). Genetically Engineered Crops and Rural Society. In: Ricroch, A., Chopra, S., Fleischer, S. (eds) Plant Biotechnology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06892-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics