Advertisement

Computer-Aided Relative Assessment of Complex Effects of Decisions

  • J. L. Kulikowski
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 559)

Abstract

The chapter presents a definition of composite decision making problems as problems consisting in choosing desired actions in the case when they are connected with additional undesired effects. It is assumed that the undesired effects cannot be evaluated but by their pair-wise relative comparison. There are defined algebraic tools which can be effectively used to solution of composite decision making problem: the operations of balancing and extension of preferences and of direct balancing, direct extension and structural product of matrices describing the corresponding semi-ordering relations. Application of the algebraic tools to solution of several types of composite decision making problems is illustrated by numerical examples. Conclusions are formulated in the last section of the chapter.

References

  1. Cormen TH, Leiserson CE, Rivest RL (1994) Introduction to algorithms, 13th printing. The MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. de Bono E (1969) The mechanism of mind. Mica Management Resources Inc., UKGoogle Scholar
  3. Dennet DC (1996) Kind of minds: towards an understanding of consciousness. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Dennett. Accessed 5 Jan 2013
  4. Hempel CG (1937) A purely topological form of non-Aristotelian logic. J Symbolic Logic 2(3)Google Scholar
  5. Kulikowski JL (1986) Outline of the theory of graphs. PWN, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  6. Kulikowski JL (1992) Relational approach to structural analysis of images. Mach Graph Vis 1(1/2):299–309Google Scholar
  7. Michalewicz Z, Fogel DB (2004) How to solve it: modern heuristics. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Myers DG (2004) Intuition its powers and perils. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  9. Penrose R (1994) Shadows of the mind a search for the missing science of consciousness. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Peschel M, Riedel C (1976) Polyoptimierung. VEB Verlag Technik, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  11. Rudeanu S (2012) Sets and ordered structures. Bentham Science Publishers, KarachiMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Russel S, Norvig P (2003) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Prentice Hall, Pearson Education Inc, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nalecz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering PASWarszawaPoland

Personalised recommendations