Advertisement

Conclusions

  • João M. LemosEmail author
  • Rui Neves-Silva
  • José M. Igreja
Chapter
  • 1.1k Downloads
Part of the Advances in Industrial Control book series (AIC)

Abstract

A road map of the DCSF adaptive control algorithms is draw. This road map summarizes the main advantages and disadvantages of the different algorithms, and relates them to the degree of plant structure that is embedded in the models that underly their design. For algorithms that rely on models that embed more DCSF knowledge, the resulting performance is bigger but the capacity of applying them to different plants with just minor modifications is greatly reduced. Although illustrated in this book for DCSF control, the idea of designing control for processes that involve transport phenomena by making a change of the time variable associated to flow is a major point. In addition to these points, Chap.  discusses the importance of adaptive control of DCSFs in relation to the wider context of renewable energy production and energy markets with fast changing prices. It is remarked that the adaptive control algorithms addressed in this book may also be envisaged as basic building blocks of wider, distributed, systems, in the context of a Cyber-Physical Systems Approach. Finally, the boundary conditions of the book are established by remembering important related topics that are outside the scope of the book.

Keywords

Adaptive Control Adaptive Controller Manipulate Variable Local Controller Renewable Energy Production 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson B, Brinsmead T, De Bruyne F, Hespanha J, Liberzon D, Morse AS (2000) Multiple model adaptive control. Part 1: Finite controller coverings. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 10:909–929CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Betts JT (2010) Practical methods for optimal control and estimation using nonlinear programming, 2nd edn. SIAM, PhiladelphiaCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Carotenuto L, La Cava M, Raiconi G (1985) Regulator design for the bilinear distributed parameter of a solar power plant. Int J Sys Sci 16:885–900CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Carotenuto L, La Cava M, Muraca P, Raiconi G (1986) Feedforward control for the distributed parameter model of a solar power plant. Large Scale Syst 11:233–241zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Chakrabortty A, Ilic MD (eds) Control and optimization methods for electric smart grids. Springer, Berlin (2012)Google Scholar
  6. Elliot DL (2009) Bilinear control systems. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. Garcia-Gonzalez J, Muela R, Santosand LM, González AM (2008) Stochastic joint optimization of wind generation and pumped-storage units in an electricity market. IEEE Trans Power Syst 23(2):460–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Geering HP (2007) Optimal control with engineering applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. Giannakis GB, Kekatos V, Gatsis N, Kim S-J, Zhu H, Wollenberg BF (2013) Monitoring and optimization for power grids. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 30:108–128Google Scholar
  10. Goodwin GC, Seron MM, De Dona JA (2005) Constrained control and estimation. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  11. Kallappa P, Holmes M, Ray A (1997) Life extending control of fossil fuel power plants. Automatica 33(6):1101–1118CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Kall P, Wallace SW (1994) Stochastic programming. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim K-D, Kumar PR (2012) Cyber-physical systems: a perspective at the centennial. Proc IEEE 100:1287–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee EA, Seshia SA (2011) Introduction to embedded systems - a cyber-physical systems approach. http://LeeSeshia.org
  15. Lemos JM, Igreja JM (2014) D-SIORHC, distributed MPC with stability constraints based on a game approach, Chapter 8. In: Maestre JM, Negenborn RR (eds) Distributed model predictive control made easy, Springer, Berlin, pp 133–146Google Scholar
  16. Maestre JM, Negenborn RR (eds) (2014) Distributed model predictive control made easy. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  17. Orbach A, Rorres C, Fischl R (1981) Optimal control of a solar collector loop using a distributed-lumped model. Automatica 27(3):535–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Paoletti S, Juloski A Lj, Ferrari-Trecate G, Vidal R (2007) Identification of hybrid systems. Eur J Control 13(2–3):242–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ray A, Tangirala S (1996) Stochastic modelling of fatigue crack dynamics for on-line failure prognostics. IEEE Trans Autom Control 4(4):443–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Speyer JL, Jacobson DH (2010) Primer on optimal control theory. SIAM, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • João M. Lemos
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rui Neves-Silva
    • 2
  • José M. Igreja
    • 3
  1. 1.INESC-ID ISTUniversity of LisbonLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.FCTNew University of LisbonCaparicaPortugal
  3. 3.Institute of Engineering of LisbonLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations