Advertisement

Performance Improvement in Public Administrations by Organizational Learning

  • Margareth StollEmail author
  • Dietmar Laner
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 313)

Abstract

Due to increased pressure for cost reduction and performance in public administrations and the growing requirements for optimized service quality, citizens orientation and effectiveness public administrations must improve always faster their services and organizations. They must elaborate or interpret, communicate, learn, use and continuously change and improve a lot of legal requirements, regulations, procedures, directives, forms and checklists. Thus, the management of appropriate regulations (relevant laws, directives, procedures, forms and checklists) is fundamental and key challenge for public management. Nevertheless, regulations are distributed commonly IT supported and the collaborators have great difficulty to find appropriate, actual regulations. They are hardly used as reference for solving ad hoc learning needs. In addition, change proposals, new ideas or questions are usually not related to the existing. Consequently, new regulations are often created as add-on. They can become in contradiction to the existing. Based on Foucault’s theory we structure all regulations in accordance to the ISO 9001 standard for quality management, prepare them accordingly didactical principles and publish them on an organizational learning system. This innovative work-place integrated organizational learning concept is best supported by a confidence-based open corporate culture. The results of our case studies in different medium-sized administrations suggest that the concept was useful to promote practice-oriented regulations, workplace integrated need-oriented learning and the continual performance improvement of the public administrations.

Keywords

Document management Need oriented learning Public management Knowledge management Quality management Organizational development 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The research leading to these results was partially funded by the Tyrolean business development agency through the Stiftungsassistenz QE—Lab.

References

  1. 1.
    T. Davenport: Thinking for a living, how to get better performance and results from knowledge workers, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 2005.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Leidner, M. Alavi and T. Kayworth, Timothy: The Role of Culture in Knowledge Management, International Journal of e-Collaboration, vol. 2, p. 17 – 40, Jan-Mar 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Garvin, A. Edmondson, F. Gino: Is Yours a Learning Organization?, Harvard Business Review, vol. 86, p109-116, Mar 2008.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Edmondson: The Competitive Imperative of Learning, Harvard Business Review, vol. 86, p60-67, Jul-Aug 2008.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Alavi, D. Leidner: Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, p107-136, Mar2001.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Back and O. Bendel Lern- und Wissensportale. in P. Glotz and S. Seufert Eds. Corporate University. Institut für Medien- und Kommunikationsmanagement, Universität St. Gallen, 2002.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Rosenberg: E-Learning, Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ISO, ISO 9001:2008, Quality Managemnt Systems – requirements, ISO, 1.12.2008.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Foucault, Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977, Pantheon, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ISO/DGuide 83, ISO/DGuide 83, High level structure, identical core text and common terms and core definitions for use in Management Systems Standards, International Standard Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Stoll Managementsysteme und Prozessorientiertes Wissensmanagement in Proc. 4th Conference on Professional Knowledge Management – Experiences and Visions, Gito Verlag, Berlin (2007), volume 1, pp. 433-434.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Bals, St. Smolnik and G. Riempp A Case for Integrated Knowledge Management. in N. Gronau Eds. Proc. 4. Conference professional knowledge management – experiences and visions. Gito, Berlin, volume 2, pp. 365–373, 2007.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Reinmann-Rothmeier Mediendidaktik und Wissensmanagement. In MedienPädagogik 10, www.medienpaed.com/02-2/reinmann1.pdf, 2002.
  14. 14.
    S. Teschler, C. Stracke and J.M. Pawlowski Qualitätsmanagement in der E-Learning gestützten Aus- und Weiterbildung – Anforderungen an ein Tool auf Basis einer Expertenbefragung. in M. Breitner, B. Bruns and F. Lehner Eds. Neue Trends im E-Learning. Physika, Heidelberg, 2007.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Auinger and C. Stary Didaktikgeleiteter Wissenstransfer. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden, 2005.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Smolnik and G. Riempp Nutzenpotenziale Erfolgsfaktoren und Leistungsindikatoren von Social Software für das organisationale Wissensmanagement. in HMD - Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik 252: pp. 17-26, 2006.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    B. Hildebrandt, C. Stracke, J.M. Pawlowski Support Systeme für Qualitätsmanagement im E-Learning. in M. Breitner, B. Bruns, F. Lehner Eds. Neue Trends im E-Learning. Physika, Heidelberg, 2007.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    K. Wilbers E-Learning didaktisch gestalten. in A. Hohenstein and K. Wilbers Eds. Handbuch E-Learning. Deutscher Wirtschaftsdienst, Köln, 2002.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. Senge: Taking personal change seriously, The impact of Organizational Learning on management practice, Academy of Management Executive, vol. 17, p 47-50, May 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
  2. 2.European Academy of BozenBozenItaly

Personalised recommendations