Skip to main content

Automatic Assessment of Image Quality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1410 Accesses

Part of the book series: Cognitive Technologies ((COGTECH))

Abstract

Huge amounts of film and image content are in archives stored on analog media, slowly fading away. In professional environments new content is captured electronically. There has always been the wish to capture or reformat, to store and transmit images electronically in very high quality, but only today have the sensors been developed in a way that the capturing can be done at reasonable cost for everybody. These high quality levels for still and moving pictures come with high amounts of data. Therefore encoding is necessary for storage and transmission. In general, the encoding process is not lossless, but the aim is to preserve the perceived quality. Until recently, the only way to assess the quality of encoding schemes used to be visual tests, but meanwhile measurement schemes have been standardized in ITU-R and ITU-T which can estimate the perceived quality if some conditions are met: the measurement scheme must have access to the raw, non-coded, digital content, and the encoding scheme must be in a family of well-known coding schemes. Non-reference (NR) measurement and measurement of innovative coding schemes are an open issue. Within THESEUS, two new NR predictors were developed and their performance was evaluated. In this paper, the procedure for and the results of the assessment of a measurement scheme which estimates quality without access to the reference are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term lossy coding is used for codes where there is a difference between the input and output.

  2. 2.

    http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/vqeg/vqeg-home.aspx

References

  • R.L. Dicus, Impulse response estimation with underwater explosive charge acoustic signals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 70(1), 122–133 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Horé, D. Ziou, Image quality metrics: PSNR vs. SSIM, in 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR’10), Istanbul (IEEE, 2010), pp. 2366–2369. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icpr/icpr2010.html#HoreZ10

  • International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Recommendation P.910: subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications. Technical report, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Recommendation ITU-R BT.1907: objective perceptual video quality measurement techniques for broadcasting applications using HDTV in the presence of a full reference signal. Technical report, 2012a

    Google Scholar 

  • International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Recommendation ITU-R BT.1908: objective video quality measurement techniques for broadcasting applications using HDTV in the presence of a reduced reference signal. Technical report, 2012b

    Google Scholar 

  • International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Recommendation ITU-R BT.500-13: methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. Technical report, 2012c

    Google Scholar 

  • E.C. Larson, D.M. Chandler, Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality qssessment and the role of strategy. J. Electron. Imaging 19, 1–21 (2010). http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/jei/jei19.html#LarsonC10

  • N. Ponomarenko, F. Battisti, K. Egiazarian, J. Astola, V. Lukin, Metrics performance comparison for color image database, in Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Video Processing and Quality Metrics for Consumer Electronics (VPQM’09), Scottsdale, Jan 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Sheikh, Z. Wang, L. Cormack, A. Bovik, LIVE image quality assessment database release 2, http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality/

  • Z. Wang, A.C. Bovik, H.R. Sheikh, E.P. Simoncelli, Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(4), 600–612 (2004). http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/tip/tip13.html#WangBSS04

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Sporer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sporer, T., Kunze, K., Liebetrau, J. (2014). Automatic Assessment of Image Quality. In: Wahlster, W., Grallert, HJ., Wess, S., Friedrich, H., Widenka, T. (eds) Towards the Internet of Services: The THESEUS Research Program. Cognitive Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06755-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06755-1_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06754-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06755-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics