Advertisement

Performance Evaluation of Network Mobility Paradigms

Part of the Modeling and Optimization in Science and Technologies book series (MOST, volume 3)

Abstract

Despite the fact that Internet Protocol (IP) mobility – either for individual hosts or for entire networks – has been the subject of intense research for more than a decade, and that mobility solutions have been in existence for some time, the truth is that the behavior of these solutions under realistic conditions is largely unknown. In this respect, and specifically for the more demanding case of network mobility, several questions come to mind. Are the existing mobility paradigms adequate for generalized IP mobility? How will they behave in realistic scenarios and under considerable load? Are they scalable? This chapter addresses these questions by studying and comparing three existing network mobility paradigms: legacy, network-based and client-based. The study, performed through emulation in a scenario with real wireless links, actual mobility, and varying load, identifies the limitations of each paradigm, pointing to the very good potential of client-based network mobility solutions.

Keywords

network mobility mobility models route optimization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhu, Z., Wakikawa, R., Zhang, L.: A Survey of Mobility Support in the Internet. RFC 6301, Internet Engineering Task Force (July 2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pinheiro, P.V., Boavida, F.: OMEN – A New Paradigm for Optimal Network Mobility. In: Harju, J., Heijenk, G., Langendörfer, P., Siris, V.A. (eds.) WWIC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5031, pp. 115–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pinheiro, P., Boavida, F.: Some Results on Network Mobility Stress Testing. In: Proceedings of BCFIC 2012 – 2nd Baltic Conference on Future Internet Communications, Vilnius, Lithuania, April 25-27 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pinheiro, P.V., Boavida, F.: obSim – A Network Mobility Simulation Tool for Very Large-Scale Scenarios. In: Proceedings of NTMS 2011 - 4th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security, Paris, France, February 7-10 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pinheiro, P.V., Jain, S., Boavida, F.: A Comparative Study of Network Mobility Paradigms. In: Masip-Bruin, X., Verchere, D., Tsaoussidis, V., Yannuzzi, M. (eds.) WWIC 2011. LNCS, vol. 6649, pp. 68–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Devarapalli, V., et al.: Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support Protocol. RFC 3963, Internet Engineering Task Force (January 2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chan-Wah, N., et al.: Network Mobility Route Optimization Problem Statement. draft-ietf-nemo-ro-problem-statement-03, Internet Engineering Task Force (September 2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chan-Wah, N., et al.: Network Mobility Route Optimization Solution Space Analysis. draft-ietf-nemo-ro-space-analysis-03, Internet Engineering Task Force (September 2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carlos, J.: NEMO: Network Mobility in IPv6. Upgrade IV(2) (April 2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wakikawa, R., et al.: Optimized Route Cache Protocol (ORC). draft-wakikawa-nemo-orc-01, work in progress, Internet Engineering Task Force (November 2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wakikawa, R., et al.: ORC: Optimized Route Cache Management Protocol for Network Mobility. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Telecommunications, vol. 2, pp. 1194–1200 (February 2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jongkeun, N., et al.: Route Optimization Scheme based on Path Control Header. draft-na-nemo-path-control-header-00, work in progress, Internet Engineering Task Force (April 2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jongkeun, N.: Supporting Route Optimization in NEtwork MObility (NEMO). Technical Report INC2004-01, Seoul National University (December 2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thubert, P., et al.: Global HA to HA protocol. draft-thubert-nemo-global-haha-01.txt, work in progress, Internet Engineering Task Force (October 2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bernardos, C., et al.: MIRON: MIPv6 Route Optimization for NEMO. In: Proceedings of the ASWN 2004: 4th Workshop on Applications and Services in Wireless Networks, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, August 8-11 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bernardos, C., et al.: Mobile IPv6 Route Optimisation for Network Mobility (MIRON). draft-bernardos-nemo-miron-00, work in progress, Internet Engineering Task Force (July 2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bernardos, C.: Route Optimisation for Mobile Networks in IPv6 Heterogeneous Environments. PhD thesis, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain (September 2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    The Network Simulator – ns-2, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/
  19. 19.
    MobiWan: NS-2 extensions to study mobility in Wide-Area IPv6 Networks, http://www.inrialpes.fr/planete/mobiwan/
  20. 20.
    Shahriar, A.Z.M., Atiquzzaman, M.: Network Mobility in Satellite Networks, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.125.149&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  21. 21.
    Tmix: Internet Traffic Generation, Example, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/doc/node575.html
  22. 22.
    ns-3 discrete-event network simulator for Internet systems, http://www.nsnam.org/
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    Mauchle, F., Frei, S., Rinkel, A.: Simulating mobile IPv6 with ns-3. In: Proceedings of SIMUTools 2010 - 3rd International ICST Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques, Torremolinos, Malaga, Spain, March 15-19 (2010), doi:10.4108/ICST.SIMUTOOLS2010.8682Google Scholar
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
    An Accurate and Extensible Mobile IPv6 (xMIPv6) Simulation Model for OMNeT++, http://www.kn.e-technik.tu-dortmund.de/content/view/232/lang,de/
  27. 27.
    Yousaf, F.Z., Bauer, C., Wietfeld, C.: An accurate and extensible mobile IPv6 (xMIPV6) simulation model for OMNeT++. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques for Communications, Networks and Systems & Workshops, pp. 1–8. ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), Marseille (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Parallel Simulation with OMNeT++. CTIE, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, http://ctieware.eng.monash.edu.au/twiki/bin/view/Simulation/ParallelSimulation
  29. 29.
    Narten, T., et al.: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6). RFC 4861, Internet Engineering Task Force (September 2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Perkins, C., Johnson, D., Arkko, J.: Mobility Support in IPv6. RFC 6275, Internet Engineering Task Force (July 2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    The OPNET Modeler, http://www.opnet.com/
  32. 32.
    Academic Research and Teaching with OPNET Software, http://www.ctr.kcl.ac.uk/opnet/opnet.html
  33. 33.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculdade de Ciencias e Tecnologia da Universidade de CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations