Extending the Fitness-Utility Model for Management Artifacts in IS Design Science Research
This paper proposes an extended fitness-utility model for management artifacts in IS DSR – such as artifacts for IT management or IT project management. It connects the elements of Gill and Hevner’s fitness-utility model to different phases of an artifact lifecycle and different types of artifact relevance. It is shown that, due to the nature of management artifacts compared to IT artifacts, management artifacts are to be evaluated in terms of conceptual – and not instrumental – relevance and highlighted that different aspects of fitness are important for abstract and instantiated artifacts to sustain long-term utility. Based on these findings, a first version of an extended fitness-utility model is proposed. It is substantiated based on selected findings from empirical research about important factors for adoption of IS/IT management artifacts of practice. IS researchers who want to design IS/IT management or IT project management artifacts can use the extended fitness-utility model to explicitly consider relevant aspects of fitness already during design-time of their artifacts.
Keywordsfitness utility artifacts relevance management artifacts fitnessutility model
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Van Aken, J.E., Romme, A.G.L.: A Design Science Approach to Evidence-Based Management. In: Rosseau, D.M. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Evidence-Based Management, pp. 43–61. Oxford University Press, New York (2012)Google Scholar
- 3.Avenier, M.-J.: Shaping a Constructivist View of Organizational Design Science. Organization Studies 31( 9/10), 1229–1255 (2010)Google Scholar
- 5.Drechsler, A.: Design Science as Design of Social Systems - Implications for Information Systems Research. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 14(4) (2013) (in print)Google Scholar
- 6.Gill, T.G., Hevner, A.R.: A Fitness-Utility Model for Design Science Research. ACM Trans. Manage. Inf. Syst. 4(2), 5:1–5:24 (2013)Google Scholar
- 7.Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact. MIS Quarterly 37(2), 337–A6 (2013)Google Scholar
- 8.Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The Anatomy of a Design Theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(5), 312–335 (2007)Google Scholar
- 9.Kuechler, W., Vaishnavi, V.: A Framework for Theory Development in Design Science Research: Multiple Perspectives. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 13(6), 395–423 (2012)Google Scholar
- 10.Mohan, K., Ahlemann, F.: Committed Use of Project Management Methodologies: Understanding the Role of Costs, Benefits, and Psychological Needs. In: ICIS 2013 Proceedings (2013)Google Scholar
- 14.Rudd, C.: ITIL V3 Planning to Implement Service Management. The Stationery Office, London (2010)Google Scholar