Skip to main content

Trajectory Sensitivity Analysis for Dynamic Security Assessment and Other Applications in Power Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Real-Time Stability in Power Systems

Part of the book series: Power Electronics and Power Systems ((PEPS))

Abstract

Real-time stability evaluation and preventive scheduling in power systems offer many challenges in a stressed power system. Trajectory Sensitivity Analysis (TSA) is a useful tool for this and other applications in the emerging smart grid area. In this chapter, we outline the basic approach of TSA, to extract suitable information from the data and develop reliable metrics or indices to evaluate proximity of the system to an unstable condition. Trajectory sensitivities can be used to compute critical parameters such as clearing time of circuit breakers, tie-line flow, etc. in a power system by developing suitable norms for ease of interpretation. The TSA technique has the advantage that model complexity is not a limitation, and the sensitivities can be computed numerically. Suitable metrics are developed from these sensitivities. The TSA technique can be extended to do preventive rescheduling. A brief discussion of other applications of TSA in placement of distributed generation is indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abur A, Exposito AG (2004) Power system state estimation: theory and implementation. CRC , Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M (2012) Power system state estimation. Artech House, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsac O, Stott B (1974) Optimal load flow with steady state security. IEEE Trans Power App Syst 93:745–754 (PAS)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athay T, Podmore R, Virmani S (1979) A practical method for direct analysis of transient stability. IEEE Trans Power App Syst 98(2):573–584 (PAS)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaniotis D, Pai MA, Hiskens IA (2001) Sensitivity analysis of differential-algebraic systems using the GMRES method-application to power systems. In: Proceeding of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuit System, Sydney, 6–9 May 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobraca F, Pai MA, Sauer PW (1990) Relay margins as a tool for dynamical security analysis. Intl Electr Power Energy Syst 12(4):226–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly MK, Dagle JE, Trudnowski DJ, Rogers GJ (1996) Impacts of the distributed utility on transmission system stability. IEEE Trans Power Syst 11(2):741–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eslami M (1994) Theory of sensitivity in dynamic systems. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fouad AA (1988) Dynamic security assessment practices in North America. IEEE Trans Power Syst 3(3):1310–1321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouad AA, Vittal V (1991) Power system transient stability analysis using the transient energy function method. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank PM (1978) Introduction to system sensitivity theory. Academic, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gan D, Thomas RJ, Zimmerman RD (2000) Stability-constrained optimal power flow. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(2):535–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hingorani NG, Gyu Gyi L (2000) Understanding facts concepts and technology of flexible ac transmission systems. IEEE Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiskens IA, Pai MA (2000) Trajectory sensitivity analysis of hybrid systems. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Fundam Theory Appl 47(2):204–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiskens IA, Pai MA, Nguyen TB (1999) Dynamic contingency analysis studies for inter-area transfers. In: Proceedings of the 13th power systems computation conference, Trondheim, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbark EW (1950) Power System Stability. Power circuit breakers and protective relays, vol II. Wiley, New York, p 160

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokotovic PV, Rutman RS (1973) Sensitivity of automatic control systems (survey). In: Cruz JB Jr (ed) System sensitivity analysis. Dowden, Hutchingson and Ross, Stroudsburg, pp 359–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar ABR, Amelink H, Pang CK, Pai MA, Sauer PW (1987) Dynamic security assessment for power systems: research plan. EPRI report EL-4958, Aug 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • La Scala M, Trovato M, Antonelli C (1998) Online dynamic preventive control: an algorithm for transient security dispatch. IEEE Trans Power Syst 13(2):601–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufenberg MJ, Pai MA (1998) A new approach to dynamic security assessment using trajectory sensitivities. IEEE Trans Power Syst 13(3):953–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laughton MA (1964) Sensitivity in dynamical system analysis. J Electron Control 17(5):577–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monticelli A (2000) Electric power system state estimation. Proceeding of the IEEE 88(2):262–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monticelli A (2007) State estimation in electric power systems: a generalized approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TB, Pai MA (2003) Dynamic security-constrained rescheduling of power systems using trajectory sensitivities. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(2):848–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TB, Pai MA, Hiskens IA (2002) Sensitivity approaches for direct computation of critical parameters in a power system. Intl J Electr Power Energy Syst 24(5):337–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padiyar KR, Krishna S (2001) On-line detection of loss of synchronism using locally measurable quantities. In: Proceedings of IEEE Transmission and Distribution Conference, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  • Pai MA (1981) Power systems stability. North Holland Publishing Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pai MA (1989) Energy Function Analysis for Power Systems. Kluwer Academic, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pavella M, Murthy PG (1994) Transient stability of power systems: theory and practice. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavella M, Ernst D, Ruiz-Vega D (2000) Transient stability of power systems: a unified approach to assessment and control. Kluwer Academic, Norwell

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Vega D, Pavella M (2003) A comprehensive approach to transient stability control: part I-Near optimal preventive control. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(4):1446–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer PW, Pai MA (1998) Power system dynamics and stability. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubhanga KN, Kulkarni AM (2004) Stability-constrained generation rescheduling using energy margin sensitivities. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19(3):1402–1413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh C, Hiskens IA (2001) Direct assessment of protection operation and non-viable transients. IEEE Trans Power Syst 16(3):427–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soman SA, Nguyen TB, Pai MA, Vaidyanathan R (2004) Analysis of angle stability problems: a transmission protection systems perspective. IEEE Trans Power Del 19(3):1024–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorp JS, Phadke AG (1999) Protecting power systems in the post-restructuring era. IEEE Comput Appl Power 12(1):33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomovic R (1963) Sensitivity analysis of dynamic systems. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomovic R, Vukobratovic M (1972) General sensitivity theory. Elsevier, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vaidyanathan R, Soman SA (2002) Distance relay coordination considering power swings. In: Proceedings of the international conference on power systems and communication systems infrastructure for the future, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  • Vittal V, Sauer PW, Meliopoulos S, Stefopoulos GK (2005) Online transient stability assessment scoping study-final project report. Power Systems Engineering Research Center, PSERC Publication 05-04

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan Y, Kubokawa J, Sasaki H (2003) A solution of optimal power flow with multicontingency transient stability constraints. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(3):1094–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zima M, Andersson G (2003) Stability assessment and emergency control method using trajectory sensitivities. In: Proceedings of the IEEE PowerTech Conference, Bologna, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman R, Gan D (2005) MATPOWER: a MATLAB power system simulation software package. http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower. Accessed 25 May 2005

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony B. Nguyen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing - Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nguyen, T., Pai, M. (2014). Trajectory Sensitivity Analysis for Dynamic Security Assessment and Other Applications in Power Systems. In: Savulescu, S. (eds) Real-Time Stability in Power Systems. Power Electronics and Power Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06680-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06680-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06679-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06680-6

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics