Skip to main content

Mollic Epipedon

Abstract

The mollic epipedon is a key diagnostic epipedon in Soil Taxonomy (Soil Survey Staff 2010) and is recognized in many other soil classification schemes as black soil, Chernozems, chestnut soils, Brunizems, Phaeozems, and Kastanozems. The origin of the mollic epipedon is only partially understood; however, the relation between Mollisols and grassland or steppe has been recognized for more than a century (Shantz 1923). Soils containing a mollic epipedon are among the world’s most productive soils (Liu et al. 2012). The thickness and high soil organic carbon (SOC) contents of the mollic epipedon mean that these soils have sequestered large amounts of C over long periods of time. In agricultural areas, the SOC content has decreased somewhere between 30 and 50 % from soil erosion and increased decomposition and cropping (Mann 1985; Mikhailova et al. 2000; Liu et al. 2010; Fenton 2012; David et al. 2009). As a result some Mollisols no longer have a mollic epipedon (Veenstra and Burras 2002; Fenton 2012).

Keywords

  • Soil Organic Carbon
  • Soil Organic Carbon Content
  • Mean Annual Precipitation
  • Soil Series
  • Soil Survey Staff

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06668-4_5
  • Chapter length: 18 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-06668-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 5.1
Fig. 5.2
Fig. 5.3

References

  • Abtahi A, Khormali F (2001) Genesis and morphological characteristics of Mollisols formed in a catena under water table influence in southern Iran. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 32:1643–1658

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DW (1979) Processes of humus formation and transformation in soils of the Canadian Great Plains. J Soil Sci 30:77–84

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DW (1987) Pedogenesis in the grassland and adjacent forest of the Great Plains. Adv Soil Sci 7:53–93

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Andreeva DB, Leiber K, Glaser B, Hambach U, Erbajeva M, Chimitdorgieva GD, Tashav V, Zech W (2011) Genesis and properties of black soils in Buryatia, southeastern Siberia, Russia. Quat Int 243:313–326

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez R, Lavado RS (1998) Climate, organic matter and clay content relationships in the Pampa and Chaco soils, Argentina. Geoderma 83:127–141

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold RW, Riecken FF (1964) Grainy gray ped coatings in Brunizem soils. Proc Iowa Acad Sci 71:350–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Beinroth FH, Eswaran H, Palmieri F, Reich PF (1996) Properties, classification, and management of Oxisols. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya T, Pal DK, Lal S, Chandran P, Ray SK (2006) Formation and persistence of Mollisols on zeolitic Deccan basalt of humid tropical India. Geoderma 136:609–620

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo O, Blanco MC, Amiotti N (2007) Control factors in the segregation of Mollisols and Aridisols of the semiarid–arid transition of Argentina. Catena 70:220–228

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • David MB, McIsaac GF, Darmody RG, Omonode RA (2009) Long-term changes in Mollisol organic carbon and nitrogen. J Environ Qual 38:200–211

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas CL, Fehrenbacher JB, Ray BW (1967) The lower boundary of selected Mollisols. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 31:795–800

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Eckmeier E, Gerlach R, Gehrt E, Schmidt MWI (2007) Pedogenesis of Chernozems in central Europe: a review. Geoderma 139:288–299

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fenton TE (1983) Mollisols. In: Wilding LP, Smeck NE, Hall GF (eds) Pedogenesis and soil taxonomy: II. Soil orders. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 125–163

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fenton TE (2012) The impact of erosion on the classification of Mollisols in Iowa. Can J Soil Sci 92:413–418

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Finke PA (2012) Modeling the genesis of luvisols as a function of topographic position in loess parent material. Quat Int 265:3–17

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard MA, Mikhailova EA, Post CJ, Schlautman MA, Galbraith JM (2009) Continental United States atmospheric wet calcium deposition and soil inorganic carbon stocks. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:989–994

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • IUSS Working Group WRB (2007) World reference base for soil resources 2006, first update 2007. World Soil Resources Report number 103. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Khormali F, Ajami M (2011) Pedogenetic investigation of soil degradation on a deforested loess hillslope of Golestan Province, Northern Iran. Geoderma 167–168:274–283

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Liu XB, Zhang XY, Wang YX, Sui YY, Zhang SL, Herbert SJ, Ding G (2010) Soil degradation: a problem threatening the sustainable development of agriculture in Northeast China. Plant Soil Environ 56:87–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Burras CL, Kravchenko YS, Duran A, Huffman T, Morras H, Studdert G, Zhang X, Cruse RM, Yuan X (2012) Overview of Mollisols in the world: distribution, land use and management. Can J Soil Sci 92:383–402

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mann LK (1985) A regional comparison of carbon in cultivated and uncultivated Alfisols and Mollisols in the Central United States. Geoderma 36:241–253

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Marbut CF (1935) Soils of the United States. Bur. of agricultural economics, Atlas of American Agriculture, Pt. III, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mella W, Mermut AR (2010) Genesis and mineralogy of soils formed on uplifted coral reef in West Timor, Indonesia. Geoderma 154:544–553

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailova EA, Bryant RB, Vassenev II, Schwager SJ, Post CJ (2000) Cultivation effects on soil carbon and nitrogen contents at depth in the Russian chernozem. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:738–745

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen GA, Hole FD (1963) A study of the natural processes of the incorporation of organic matter into soil in the University of Wisconsin Arboretum. Wisc Acad Sci Arts Lett 52:213–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Oades JM (1988) The retention of organic matter in soils. Biogeochemistry 5:35–70

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Olson KR, Jones RL, Lang JM (2005) Soil formation at Millstone Bluff and Johnson Ridge in southern Illinois. Soil Sci 170:457–468

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Parton WJ, Schimel DS, Cole CV, Ojima DS (1987) Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:1173–1179

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pennock D, Bedard-Haughn A, Viaud V (2011) Chernozemic soils of Canada: genesis, distribution, and classification. Can J Soil Sci 91:719–747

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rodionov A, Wulf A, Peinemann N, Haumaier L, Zhang X, Kleber M, Glaser B, Urusevskaya I, Zech W (2010) Black carbon in grassland ecosystems of the world. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 24:GB3013. doi:10.1029/2009GB003669

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shantz HL (1923) The natural vegetation of the Great Plains region. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 13:81–107

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw JN, Rabenhorst MC (1999) Pedogenic and morphological characteristics of marl derived soils in the ridge and valley province. East U S Soil Sci 164:936–945

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith GD, Allaway WH, Riecken FF (1950) Prairie soils of the Upper Mississippi Valley. Adv Agron 2:157–205

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys, 2nd edn. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service. Agric. Handbook No. 436, Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (2010) Keys to soil taxonomy, 11th edn. USDA, National Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Arnaud RJ, Sudom MD (1981) Mineral distribution and weathering in Chernozemic and Luvisolic soils from central Saskatchewan. Can J Soil Sci 61:79–89

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan KL, McDaniel PA, Phillips WM (2011) Episodic soil succession on basaltic lava fields in a cool, dry environment. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75:1462–1470

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra JJ, Burras CL (2012) Effects of agriculture on the classification of black soils in the Midwestern United States. Can J Soil Sci 92:403–411

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Waltman SW, Ciolkosz EJ (1995) Prairie soil development in northwestern Pennsylvania. Soil Sci 160:199–208

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Alfred Hartemink contributed Fig. 5.1 and drafted Fig. 5.2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bockheim, J.G. (2014). Mollic Epipedon. In: Soil Geography of the USA. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06668-4_5

Download citation