Abstract
Gerontology is an interdisciplinary field. Corresponding to the many facets of the main object of its study, many different scientific methods and theories are part of a common inquiry into the understanding of old age and aging processes. The social sciences or social gerontology and biology or biogerontology provide important contributions to these inquiries. Both fields develop their own theoretical frameworks, which determine their basic understanding of aging and old age. However, both social gerontology and biogerontology also have set practical goals for their respective research agenda. These goals are not only guiding the direction of the scientific work, but they also inform and guide the different interpretations of aging and old age. This chapter will outline how these different practical goals lead to a conflict of interpretations of aging, which creates a general conflict between social-gerontological and biogerontological research agendas and on what is considered an appropriate understanding of aging and old age. One consequence is that synergies and cooperation between the different fields of gerontology are hindered. An interdisciplinary dialogue to raise the awareness of the different interpretations of age and aging is suggested as a possible way out from this unfortunate situation, towards a more integrated interpretation of age and aging, and possibly towards a common research agenda.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alley DE, Putney NM, Rice M, Bengtson VL (2010) The increasing use of theory in social gerontology: 1990-2004. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 65(5):583–590
Arking R (2006) The biology of aging: observations and principles. Oxford University Press, New York
Austad SN (2002) Session 1: adding years to life: current knowledge and future prospects. http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/pcbe/transcripts/dec02/session1.html. Accessed 27 Sept 2013
Bengtson VL, Burgess EO, Parrott TM (1997) Theory, explanation, and a third generation of theoretical development in social gerontology. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 52(2):S72–S88
Blumenthal HT (2003) The aging-disease dichotomy: true or false? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58A(2):138–145
Butler RN (1968) Age-ism. Gerontologist 9(4):243–246
Butler RN (2008) The longevity revolution. Public Affairs, New York
Butler RN, Miller RA, Perry D, Carnes BA, Williams TF, Cassel C, Brody J, Bernard MA, Partridge L, Kirkwood T, Martin GM, Olshansky SJ (2008) New model of health promotion and disease prevention for the 21st century. Br Med J 337(7662):a399
Dannefer D, Settersten RA (2010) The study of the life course: implications for social gerontology. The SAGE handbook of social gerontology. Sage, London, pp 3–19
Ehni H (2012) Evil, problem of. In: Chadwick R (ed) Encyclopedia of applied ethics. Academic, San Diego, pp 226–233
Ehni H (2014) Ethik der Biogerontologie [Ethics of biogerontology]. Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Epel ES, Blackburn EH, Lin J, Dhabhar FS, Adler NE, Morrow JD, Cawthon RM (2004) Accelerated telomere shortening in response to life stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(49): 17312–17315
Estes CL (2001) Social policy and aging. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Farrelly C (2008) A tale of two strategies. The moral imperative to tackle ageing. EMBO Rep 9(7):592–595
Fontana L (2009) Modulating human aging and age-associated diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta 1790(10):1133–1138
Gems D (2003) Is more life always better? Hastings Cent Rep 33(4):31–39
Gems D (2011) Tragedy and delight: the ethics of decelerated ageing. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366(1561):108–112
Habermas J (1968) Erkenntnis und Interesse [Knowledge and interests]. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main
Habermas J (1971) Knowledge and human interests. Beacon, Boston
Hayflick L (2004) The not-so-close relationship between biological aging and age-associated pathologies in humans. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59(6):B547–B550, discussion 551–553
Kirkwood T (2005) Understanding the odd science of aging. Cell 120(4):437–447
Kirkwood T (2011) Systems biology of ageing and longevity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366(1561):64–70
Kuh D (2006) A life course perspective on telomere length and social inequalities in aging. Aging Cell 5(6):579–580
McDaniel SA, Zimmer Z (2013) Global ageing in the twenty-first century. Ashgate, Surrey
Moody HR (2001) Who’s afraid of life extension. Generations 25(4):33–37
NIA (2010) In memoriam Robert N. Butler. http://www.nia.nih.gov/newsroom/announcements/2010/07/memoriam-robert-n-butler-md#.UnvJjeKW72k. Accessed 7 Nov 2013
Nussbaum MC (1992) Human functioning and social justice: in defense of aristotelian essentialism. Polit Theor 20(2):202–246
Olshansky SJ, Perry D, Miller RA, Butler RN (2006) In pursuit of the longevity dividend. Scientist 20(3):28–36
Palmore EB, Branch L, Harris DK (2005) Encyclopedia of ageism. Haworth Pastoral Press, New York
Rattan SIS (2007) The science of healthy aging: genes, milieu, and chance. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1114:1–10
Ricœur P (1969) Le Conflit des interprétations [The conflict of interpretations]. Éditions du Seuil, Paris
Ricœur P (1974) The conflict of interpretations. Northwestern University Press, Evanston
Rose MR (2009) Adaptation, aging, and genomic information. Aging 1(5):444–450
Sachverständigenkommission zur Erstellung des Sechsten Altenberichts der Bundesregierung [Commission for the Sixth German Government Report on the Elderly] (2010) Sechster Bericht zur Lage der älteren Generation in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Sixth German Government Report on the Elderly]. Deutscher Bundestag, Berlin
Searle JR (2010) Making the social world. Oxford University Press, Oxford [u.a.]
Snow CP (1959) The two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge University Press, New York
Stoljar D (2009) Physicalism. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/entries/physicalism/. Accessed 11 Nov 2013
Vincent JA (2003) What is at stake in the “war on anti-ageing medicine”? Ageing Soc 23(5): 675–684
Vincent JA (2008) The cultural construction old age as a biological phenomenon: science and anti-ageing technologies. J Aging Stud 331–339
Vincent JA (2009) Ageing, anti-ageing, and anti-anti-ageing: who are the progressives in the debate on the future of human biological ageing? Med Stud 1(3):197–208
Zuidervaart L (2011) Theodor W. Adorno. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/adorno/. Accessed 11 Nov 2013
Acknowledgments
This book chapter is one of the results of the work I was able to carry out during my FLARE postdoctoral fellowship from 2008 to 2011. Without this fellowship and the resulting opportunities for scientific networking and exchange, an interdisciplinary research question like the one I am discussing here would be very hard, if not impossible, to answer. I want to thank the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF), which provided funding for this project as partner in ERA-AGE for this opportunity. The same thanks go to of course to the people from ERA-AGE and the coordinating partner in Sheffield, who have been incredibly supportive for my work. For providing peer review for this chapter, I want to thank Wim Pinxten and Anja Leist for her thorough reading and comments, which were very helpful for improving and clarifying this chapter and its content.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ehni, HJ. (2014). A Conflict of Interpretations in Gerontology. In: Leist, A., Kulmala, J., Nyqvist, F. (eds) Health and Cognition in Old Age. International Perspectives on Aging, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06650-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06650-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06649-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06650-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)