Skip to main content

Economic Efficiency of Production Systems in the Gharb Irrigated Area (Morocco) Affected by Access to Water Resources

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agricultural Cooperative Management and Policy

Part of the book series: Cooperative Management ((COMA))

  • 942 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this work is to calculate and compare the economic efficiency indices of irrigated farms and the level of optimisation of irrigation water used for the main crops of the Gharb area. To this end, a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model was used to calculate efficiency indices. The survey covered 49 farms with different crop systems (vegetables, citrus crops, cereals, forage, sugar beet and sugar cane) and different irrigation systems (drip, sprinkler and gravity-fed). The results show that the most efficient farms are both those affected by water stress and those with “unlimited” access to water resources (private pumping). On the other hand, 73 % of the farms are inefficient, indicating that the majority of farmers do not have a good grasp of the available technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gharb Regional Agricultural Development Agency.

  2. 2.

    Six of the 13 farms were surveyed by Mamounata SEMDE, Rural Engineer, Hassan II Agronomy and the Veterinary Medicine Institute.

  3. 3.

    In this irrigation method, a worker brings water to the plot with a plastic hose and tries to cover the whole acreage. This practice is very common in groundnut cultivation in the sandy coastal area.

  4. 4.

    http://www.olympe-project.net/

  5. 5.

    ETM  Evapotranspiration maximum.

References

  • Afriat, S. N. (1972). Efficiency estimation of production functions. International Economic Review, 13(3), 568–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachta, M. S., & Chebil, A. (2002). Efficacité technique des exploitations céréalières de la plaine du Sers-Tunisie. New Medit, 1(2), 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badillo, P. Y., & Paradi J. C. (1999). La méthode DEA: Analyse des performances, Paris: Hermès science-publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belghiti, M. (2008). L’agriculture irriguée au MAROC: Enjeux et marges de progrès. Hommes, Terre et Eaux, 139, 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouaziz, A., & Belabbes, K. (2002). Efficience productive de l’eau en irrigué au Maroc. Hommes, Terre & Eaux, 32(124), 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boussemart, J. P. (1994). Diagnostique de l’efficacité productive par la méthode DEA : Application à des élevages porcins. Cahiers d’Economie et Sociologie Rurales, 31(4), 44–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W., et al. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., et al. (1981). Evaluating program and managerial efficiency : An application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Management Science, 27(6), 668–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. (1951). The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica, 19(3), 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. C. (1951). Efficient allocation of resources. Econometrica, 19(4), 455–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, L. J., & Yotopoulos, P. A. (1971). A test for relative efficiency and application to Indian agriculture. The American Economic Review, 61(1), 94–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. S., & Lu, L. Y. Y., et al. (2013). Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: A citation-based literature survey. Omega, 41(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, J. (1974). On sources of measured technical efficiency: The impact of information. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56(4), 730–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penot, E., & Deheuvels O. (2007). Modélisation économique des exploitations agricoles, Modélisation, simulation et aide à la décision avec le logiciel Olympe. L’Harmattan, 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raab, R. L., & Lichty, R. W. (2002). Identifying subareas that comprise a greater metropolitan area: The criterion of county relative efficiency. Journal of Regional Science, 42(3), 579–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmer, C. P. (1971). Using a probabilistic frontier production function to measure technical efficiency. Journal of Political Economy, 79(4), 776–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermersch, D., & Dervaux, B., et al. (1995). Efficacité technique et gains potentiels de productivité des exploitations céréalières françaises. Économie & prévision: 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Harbouze .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harbouze, R., Le Grusse, P., Bouaziz, A., Mailhol, J.C., Ruelle, P., Raki, M. (2014). Economic Efficiency of Production Systems in the Gharb Irrigated Area (Morocco) Affected by Access to Water Resources. In: Zopounidis, C., Kalogeras, N., Mattas, K., van Dijk, G., Baourakis, G. (eds) Agricultural Cooperative Management and Policy. Cooperative Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06635-6_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics