Skip to main content

Expanding Agri-Food Production and Employment in the Presence of Climate Policy Constraints: Quantifying the Trade-Off in Ireland

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agricultural Cooperative Management and Policy

Part of the book series: Cooperative Management ((COMA))

  • 917 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores the trade-off between competing objectives of employment creation and climate policy commitments in Irish agriculture. A social accounting matrix (SAM) multiplier model is linked with a partial equilibrium agricultural sector model to simulate the impact of a number of GHG emission reduction scenarios, assuming these are achieved through a constraint on beef production. Limiting the size of the beef sector helps to reduce GHG emissions with a very limited impact on the value of agricultural income at the farm level. However, the SAM multiplier analysis shows that there would be significant employment losses in the wider economy. From a policy perspective, a pragmatic approach to GHG emissions reductions in the agriculture sector, which balances opportunities for economic growth in the sector with opportunities to reduce associated GHG emissions, may be required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The AgriFood-SAM used in this model is based on 2005 data when sugar production was still represented in the agricultural sector in Ireland. This does not significantly influence the results as sugar has little input into any of the four sectors in the model.

  2. 2.

    The method used to estimate the final demand shocks is detailed in Miller et al. (2011).

  3. 3.

    The complete table with all 57 employment elasticities and marginal employment elasticities can be found in Miller et al. (2013).

  4. 4.

    The model uses an annual unbalanced panel dataset for the period 1995–2008 measured in constant 2006 prices. Estimates of the marginal employment coefficients would benefit from an updated and/or balanced panel not available at the moment of this exercise.

  5. 5.

    For those sectors where marginal employment coefficients could not be calculated, the employment changes associated with output changes are assumed to be zero.

References

  • Binfield, J., Donnellan, T., Hanrahan, K., & Westhoff, P. (2003). The luxembourg cap reform agreement: implications for EU and irish agriculture. Ireland: The Luxembourg CAP Agreement, Teagasc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binfield, J., Donnellan, T., Hanrahan, K., & Westhoff, P. (2007). CAP health check analysis: impact on EU milk quota expansion. Carlow: Teagasc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binfield, J., Donnellan, T., Hanrahan, K., & Westhoff, P. (2008). Issues in examining the impact of WTO reform on the Beef and Dairy Sectors in the European Union. Beijing: International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, J., Donnellan, T., & Westhoff, P. (2010). Food for thought: EU agriculture presents new challenges for EU agriculture. EuroChoices, 9(3), 24–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Statistics Office 2009. Supply, Use and Input-Output Tables for Ireland, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Food 2006. Annual Review and Outlook 2005/2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Food 2010. Food Harvest 2020. A vision for Irish agri-food and fisheries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, T., & Hanrahan, K. (2006). It’s the environment, stupid! To what extent can WTO trade reform lead to environmental rather than economic impacts? In 3rd World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists, Kyoto, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, T., & Hanrahan, K. (2012). Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Irish Agriculture: Consequences arising from the Food Harvest Targets. Agricultural Economics: Teagasc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency 2012. Ireland’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Projections 2011–2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency 2013. Ireland National Inventory Report 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament 2009. Decision No 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the effort of Member States to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Community’s greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellmann, T., PĂ©rez DomĂ­nguez, I., Witzke, H.-P., & Oudendag, D. (2012). Mitigating GHG emissions from EU agriculture—What difference does the policy make? In International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) Triennial Conference, Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanrahan, K. (2001). The EU GOLD model 2.1: An introductory manual. Dublin: Mimeo, Teagasc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, W., Westhoff, P., Fabiosa, J., & Hayes, D. J. (2010). The FAPRI global modelling system and outlook. Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, 6(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. C., Matthews, A., Donnellan, T., & O`Donoghue, C. (2011). A 2005 Agricultural-Food SAM (AgriFood-SAM) for Ireland. Trinity College Dublin, IIIS Discussion Paper No. 372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. C., Matthews, A., Donnellan, T., & O`Donoghue, C. (2013). The employment effects of Food Harvest 2020 in Ireland. In 87th Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economics Society. University of Warwick, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • O`Mara, F. (2011). The significance of livestock as a contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions today and in the near future. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 166–167, 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyatt, G., & Round, J. I. (1979). Accounting and fixed price multipliers in a social accounting matrix framework. Economic Journal, 89(356), 850–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhoff, P., & Meyers, W. (2010). The FAPRI approach: A few key principles. Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, 6(1), 133–135.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Corina Miller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miller, A.C., Donnellan, T., Matthews, A., Hanrahan, K., O’Donoghue, C. (2014). Expanding Agri-Food Production and Employment in the Presence of Climate Policy Constraints: Quantifying the Trade-Off in Ireland. In: Zopounidis, C., Kalogeras, N., Mattas, K., van Dijk, G., Baourakis, G. (eds) Agricultural Cooperative Management and Policy. Cooperative Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06635-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics