Abstract
This chapter explores the trade-off between competing objectives of employment creation and climate policy commitments in Irish agriculture. A social accounting matrix (SAM) multiplier model is linked with a partial equilibrium agricultural sector model to simulate the impact of a number of GHG emission reduction scenarios, assuming these are achieved through a constraint on beef production. Limiting the size of the beef sector helps to reduce GHG emissions with a very limited impact on the value of agricultural income at the farm level. However, the SAM multiplier analysis shows that there would be significant employment losses in the wider economy. From a policy perspective, a pragmatic approach to GHG emissions reductions in the agriculture sector, which balances opportunities for economic growth in the sector with opportunities to reduce associated GHG emissions, may be required.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The AgriFood-SAM used in this model is based on 2005 data when sugar production was still represented in the agricultural sector in Ireland. This does not significantly influence the results as sugar has little input into any of the four sectors in the model.
- 2.
The method used to estimate the final demand shocks is detailed in Miller et al. (2011).
- 3.
The complete table with all 57 employment elasticities and marginal employment elasticities can be found in Miller et al. (2013).
- 4.
The model uses an annual unbalanced panel dataset for the period 1995–2008 measured in constant 2006 prices. Estimates of the marginal employment coefficients would benefit from an updated and/or balanced panel not available at the moment of this exercise.
- 5.
For those sectors where marginal employment coefficients could not be calculated, the employment changes associated with output changes are assumed to be zero.
References
Binfield, J., Donnellan, T., Hanrahan, K., & Westhoff, P. (2003). The luxembourg cap reform agreement: implications for EU and irish agriculture. Ireland: The Luxembourg CAP Agreement, Teagasc.
Binfield, J., Donnellan, T., Hanrahan, K., & Westhoff, P. (2007). CAP health check analysis: impact on EU milk quota expansion. Carlow: Teagasc.
Binfield, J., Donnellan, T., Hanrahan, K., & Westhoff, P. (2008). Issues in examining the impact of WTO reform on the Beef and Dairy Sectors in the European Union. Beijing: International Association of Agricultural Economists.
Breen, J., Donnellan, T., & Westhoff, P. (2010). Food for thought: EU agriculture presents new challenges for EU agriculture. EuroChoices, 9(3), 24–29.
Central Statistics Office 2009. Supply, Use and Input-Output Tables for Ireland, 2005.
Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Food 2006. Annual Review and Outlook 2005/2006.
Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Food 2010. Food Harvest 2020. A vision for Irish agri-food and fisheries.
Donnellan, T., & Hanrahan, K. (2006). It’s the environment, stupid! To what extent can WTO trade reform lead to environmental rather than economic impacts? In 3rd World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists, Kyoto, Japan.
Donnellan, T., & Hanrahan, K. (2012). Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Irish Agriculture: Consequences arising from the Food Harvest Targets. Agricultural Economics: Teagasc.
Environmental Protection Agency 2012. Ireland’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Projections 2011–2020.
Environmental Protection Agency 2013. Ireland National Inventory Report 2012.
European Parliament 2009. Decision No 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the effort of Member States to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Community’s greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020.
Fellmann, T., PĂ©rez DomĂnguez, I., Witzke, H.-P., & Oudendag, D. (2012). Mitigating GHG emissions from EU agriculture—What difference does the policy make? In International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) Triennial Conference, Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil.
Hanrahan, K. (2001). The EU GOLD model 2.1: An introductory manual. Dublin: Mimeo, Teagasc.
Meyers, W., Westhoff, P., Fabiosa, J., & Hayes, D. J. (2010). The FAPRI global modelling system and outlook. Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, 6(1), 1–20.
Miller, A. C., Matthews, A., Donnellan, T., & O`Donoghue, C. (2011). A 2005 Agricultural-Food SAM (AgriFood-SAM) for Ireland. Trinity College Dublin, IIIS Discussion Paper No. 372.
Miller, A. C., Matthews, A., Donnellan, T., & O`Donoghue, C. (2013). The employment effects of Food Harvest 2020 in Ireland. In 87th Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economics Society. University of Warwick, United Kingdom.
O`Mara, F. (2011). The significance of livestock as a contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions today and in the near future. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 166–167, 7–15.
Pyatt, G., & Round, J. I. (1979). Accounting and fixed price multipliers in a social accounting matrix framework. Economic Journal, 89(356), 850–873.
Westhoff, P., & Meyers, W. (2010). The FAPRI approach: A few key principles. Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, 6(1), 133–135.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miller, A.C., Donnellan, T., Matthews, A., Hanrahan, K., O’Donoghue, C. (2014). Expanding Agri-Food Production and Employment in the Presence of Climate Policy Constraints: Quantifying the Trade-Off in Ireland. In: Zopounidis, C., Kalogeras, N., Mattas, K., van Dijk, G., Baourakis, G. (eds) Agricultural Cooperative Management and Policy. Cooperative Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06635-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06635-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06634-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06635-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)