Skip to main content

Non-linear Stability Analysis of a Modified Gas Foil Bearing Structure

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 9th IFToMM International Conference on Rotor Dynamics

Part of the book series: Mechanisms and Machine Science ((Mechan. Machine Science,volume 21))

Abstract

Gas foil bearings (GFBs) have been successfully introduced in the field of high speed turbo machineries. A combination of low power loss, high speed operation and the omission of an oil system heighten the importance for small and medium sized turbo machineries, e.g. turbochargers or range extenders. However, experimental and numerical investigations have shown subsynchronous vibrations, which affect the rotor dynamic behaviour. Structural damping generated by friction contacts inside the compliant structure may reduce vibrations up to a certain level. In addition, several proved methods and devices, e.g. side feed pressurerisation, pre-loading due to shims and viscoelastic foil bearings are common techniques to decrease non synchronous vibrations. However, far too little attention has been paid to the causes of these non-linear effects. Understanding the causes may results in a higher knowledge of the overall GFB dynamic behaviour. Thus, the aim of this paper is to analyse the causes of these non-linear vibrations. A hypothesis is stated, that the non-linear vibrations are influenced by a self excitation and a forced non-linearity. The non-linear compressible transient Reynolds equation is discretised by a hybrid finite difference scheme with an implicit time discretisation while the pressure field is coupled with a 2D plate model. This plate model is linked to a spring-damper configuration. The time domain analysis shows, that the subsynchronous frequencies may excite the system eigenfrequency. In addition, good correlations between the onset speed of sub synchronous vibrations of the time domain simulations and the linearised frequency domain analysis are shown. In the second part of this paper, the effects of different bump foil configurations (bump-type GFB, shimmed GFB and a lobed GFB) on the dynamic performance are considered. It is shown, that an effective reduction of sub synchronous vibrations due to a non-uniform circumferential stiffness distribution and the use of shims is possible. Especially, the low loaded case (5 N) has an increase of onset speed of subsynchronous vibration of ≈173 %, compared to the same bearing setup without shims.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The circumferential stiffness distribution of case 1 shows only the bump stiffness for the “free-free” condition. The stiffening due to the fixed end was observed in the simulation, but is not shown in Fig. 3a for a better illustration.

  2. 2.

    Negative film thickness’s has been calculated and finally no pressure field convergence was possible.

Abbreviations

\({\mathbf{C}}\) :

GFB damping matrix

\(E\) :

Young-modulus

\({\mathbf{f}}_{B}\) :

Reaction force vector

\(h\) :

Film thickness

\(h_{B}\) :

Bump height

\(K_{f}\) :

Bump stiffness factor

\({\mathbf{K}}\) :

GFB stiffness matrix

\(l_{0}\) :

Half bump length

\(N_{B}\) :

Number of bumps

\(R\) :

Bearing radius

\(t_{B}\) :

Bump foil thickness

\(s_{0}\) :

Bump pitch

\(\beta\) :

Attitude angle

\(\mu\) :

Dynamic viscosity

\(\upgamma\) :

Structural loss factor

\(\lambda\) :

Eigenvalue

\(\varOmega\) :

Rotor angular speed

\(c\) :

Bearing nominal radial clearance

\(g\) :

Gravitational constant

\(f_{e}\) :

Eigenfrequency

\(h_{n,m}\) :

Impedance \((n,m) = (x,y)\)

\(j\) :

Complex number \(j = \sqrt { - 1}\)

\({\mathbf{K}}^{*}\) :

Global stiffness matrix GFB structure

\(l\) :

Bearing axial length

\(m_{r}\) :

Journal mass

\(p\) :

Pressure

\(t\) :

Time

\(t_{F}\) :

Top foil thickness

\(x,y,z\) :

Inertial coordinate system

\(\varepsilon\) :

Eccentricities

\(\eta\) :

Excitation frequency ratio

\(\nu\) :

Poisson’s ratio

\(\omega_{s}\) :

Excitation frequency (\(\omega_{s} = 2\pi f_{s}\))

\(\theta\) :

Circumferential coordinate

GFB :

Gas Foil Bearing

FBS :

Film Breakdown Speed

WFR :

Whirl Frequency Ratio \(WFR = \frac{{\omega_{i} }}{\varOmega }\)

OSSV :

Onset Speed of Subsynchronous Vibration

References

  1. DellaCorte C, Valco M (2000) Load capacity estimation of foil air journal bearings for oil-free turbomachinery applications. STLE Tribol Trans 43:795–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heshmat H (1994) Advancements in the performance of aerodynamic foil journal bearings: high speed and load capability. ASME J Tribol 116(2):287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ku C-P, Heshmat H (1994) Structural stiffness and coulomb damping in compliant foil journal bearings: parametric studies. STLE Tribol Trans 37(3):455–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rubio D, San Andrés L (2006) Bump-type foil bearing structural stiffness: experiments and predictions. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 128(3):653–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rubio D, San Andrés L (2007) Structural stiffness, dry friction coefficient, and equivalent viscous damping in a bump-type foil gas bearing. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 129(2):494–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Larsen SJ, Varela AC, Santos IF (2014) Numerical and experimental investigation of bump foil mechanical behaviour. Tribol Int 74:46–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Iordanoff I, Bou Said B, Mezianne A, Berthier Y (2008) Effect of internal friction in the dynamic behavior of aerodynamic foil bearings. Tribol Int 41(5):387–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Le Lez S, Arghir M, Frêne J (2009) Nonlinear numerical prediction of gas foil bearing stability and unbalanced response. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 131(1):012503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee D-H, Kim Y-C, Kim K-W (2010) Stability analysis of foil journal bearings considering coulomb friction. In: Proceedings IFToMM 2010—8th international conference on rotor dynamics, Seoul, Korea

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heshmat H (2000) Operation of foil bearings beyond the bending critical mode. ASME J Tribol 122(2):478–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim K-S, Cho B-C, Kim M-H (2010) Rotordynamic characteristics of 65 kw micro turbine with compliant air foil bearings. In: Proceedings: IFToMM 2010—8th international conference on rotor dynamics, Seoul, Korea

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim TH (2007) Analysis of side end pressurized bump type gas foil bearings: a model anchored to test data. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sim K, Lee Y-B, Kim TH, Lee J (2012) Rotordynamic performance of shimmed gas foil bearings for oil-free turbochargers. ASME J Tribol 134(3):031102-1–031102-11

    Google Scholar 

  14. San Andrés L, Rubio D, Kim TH (2007) Rotordynamic performance of a rotor supported on bump type foil gas bearings: experiments and predictions. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 129(3):850–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heshmat H, Chen HM, Walton II JF (2000) On the performance of hybrid foil-magnetic bearings. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 122:73–81

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee Y-B, Cho S-B, Kim T-Y, Kim CH, Kim TH (2010) Rotordynamic performance measurement of an oil-free turbocompressor supported on gas foil bearings. In: Proceedings IFToMM 2010—8th international conference on rotor dynamics, Seoul, Korea

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heshmat H, Shapiro W, Gray S (1982) Development of foil journal bearings for high load capacity and high speed whirl stability. ASME J Lubr Technol 104(2):149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Radil K, Howard S, Dykas B (2002) The role of radial clearance on the performance of foil air bearings. STLE Tribol Trans 45(4):485–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ku C-PR (1994) Dynamic structural properties of compliant foil thrust bearings-comparison between experimental and theoretical results. ASME J Tribol 116(1):70–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee YB, Kim TH, Kim CH, Lee NS, Choi DH (2004) Dynamic characteristics of a flexible rotor system supported by a viscoelastic foil bearing (VEFB). Tribol Int 37:679–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Heshmat H (1991) Analysis of compliant foil bearings with spatially variable stiffness. In: AIAA, SAE, ASME, and ASEE, 27 th joint propulsion conference, Sacramento, CA

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hoffmann R, Pronobis T, Liebich R (2014) The impact of modified corrugated bump structures on the rotor dynamic performance of gas foil bearings. ASME GT2014-25636, Düsseldorf

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sim K, Lee Y, Kim T (2013) Effects of mechanical preload and bearing clearance on rotordynamic performance of lobed gas foil bearings for oil-free turbochargers. STLE Tribol Trans 56(2):224–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim TH, San Andrés L (2009) Effect of side feed pressurization on the dynamic performance of gas foil bearings: a model anchored to test data. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 131(1):012501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoffmann R, Pronobis T, Liebich R (2014) Stability analysis of a pressurized gas foil bearings for high speed applications. In: Proceedings of 11th international conference of turbocharging, London

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kim D, Varrey MK (2012) Imbalance response and stability characteristics of a rotor supported by hybrid air foil bearings. STLE Tribol Trans 55(4):529–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim D, Lee D (2010) Design of three-pad hybrid air foil bearing and experimental investigation on static performance at zero running speed. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 132(12):122504-1–122504-10

    Google Scholar 

  28. San Andrés L, Kim T (2008) Forced nonlinear response of gas foil bearing supported rotors. Tribol Int 41(8):704–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Muszynska A (1978) Partial lateral rotor to stator rubs. In: IMechE, 3rd international conference on vibrations in rotating machinery

    Google Scholar 

  30. Liebich R (1998) Der Rotor-Stator-Kontakt unter Berücksichtigung von thermischen Effekten. Fortschritt-Berichte VDI, Reihe 1, Nr. 296. VDI Verlag GmbH

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rudloff L, Arghir M, Bonneau O, Matta P (2011) Experimental analyses of a first generation foil bearing: Startup torque and dynamic coefficients. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 133(9):092501-1–092501-9

    Google Scholar 

  32. Iordanoff I (1999) Analysis of an aerodynamic compliant foil thrust bearing: method for a rapid design. ASME J Tribol 121:816–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schiffmann J, Spakovszky ZS (2013) Foil bearing design guidelines for improved stability. ASME J Tribol 135:011103-1–011103-11

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lund JW (1968) Calculation of stiffness and damping properties of gas bearings. ASME J Lubr Technol 90(4):793–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pan CH, Kim D (2007) Stability characteristics of a rigid rotor supported by a gas-lubricated spiral-groove conical bearing. ASME J Tribol 129(2):375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pan C (1965) Spectral analysis of gas bearing systems for stability studies. In: Huang TC, Johnson MW Jr (eds) Developments in mechanics, Proceedings of the ninth midwestern mechanics conference. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wiley, New York, vol 3, Part 2, pp 431–448

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kim D (2007) Parametric studies on static and dynamic performance of air foil bearings with different top foil geometries and bump stiffness distributions. ASME J Tribol 129(2):354–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Hoffmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix

Linear Stability Analysis

$$\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {m_{r} } \hfill & 0 \hfill \\ 0 \hfill & {m_{r} } \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right]\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\mathop x\limits^{..} } \\ {\mathop y\limits^{..} } \\ \end{array} } \right\} + \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {c_{xx} } \hfill & {c_{xy} } \hfill \\ {c_{yx} } \hfill & {c_{yy} } \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right]\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\mathop x\limits^{.} } \\ {\mathop y\limits^{.} } \\ \end{array} } \right\} + \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {k_{xx} } \hfill & {k_{xy} } \hfill \\ {k_{yx} } \hfill & {k_{yy} } \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right]\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} x \\ y \\ \end{array} } \right\} = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} 0 \\ 0 \\ \end{array} } \right\}$$
(9)

An eigenvalue problem is used to analyse the linear stability of a simple oscillator with a journal mass \(m_{r}\); see Eq. (9). Similar analyses have been applied in the field of gas bearings [3436] and GFBs [33, 37]. The impedance of the linearised GFB is given by \(h_{m,n} = k_{m,n} + j\omega_{s} c_{m,n}\) (\(m,n = x,y\)). A substitution of the impedance into Eq. (9) leads to Eq. (10), while considering \({\text{x}} = {\hat{\text{x}}}e^{j\lambda t}\) as a state of solution.

$$\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {h_{xx} - h^{*} } & {h_{xy} } \\ {h_{yx} } & {h_{yy} - h^{*} } \\ \end{array} } \right]{\hat{\text{x}}}_{(f,b)} = 0$$
(10)

Where the modal impedance is \(h^{*} = - m_{r}\uplambda^{2}\). Solving Eq. (10) yields the eigenvalue \(\uplambda = (\alpha \pm j\omega_{s} )\) and three different cases are considerable: If the real part of the eigenvalue is negative (\(\alpha < 0\)), the system will become stable, whereas a positive real part indicates an unstable behaviour. For \(\alpha = 0\) a neutral stability is present, respectively. The imaginary part is also known as the modal damping impedance, whereas the real part of \(h_{f,b}^{*}\) corresponds with the modal stiffness. In this case neutral stability, means the imaginary part of the \(h_{f,b}^{*}\) becomes zero (Gl. (11)). Note forward whirl \(h_{f}^{*}\) is analysed.

$$h_{f,crit}^{*} = k_{crit,modal} = m_{r} \omega_{s,crit}^{2}$$
(11)

With a steady speed condition \(\varOmega = {\text{const}} .\) and the frequency dependence of the bearing parameter the neutral stability enables the calculation of the critical excitation frequency \(\omega_{s,crit}\) by using Eq. (11).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hoffmann, R., Pronobis, T., Liebich, R. (2015). Non-linear Stability Analysis of a Modified Gas Foil Bearing Structure. In: Pennacchi, P. (eds) Proceedings of the 9th IFToMM International Conference on Rotor Dynamics. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06590-8_103

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06590-8_103

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06589-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06590-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics