Abstract
Tradition opposed all assessment of research programs except to say that if they do not rest on science they are prejudices. A significant recent tradition of assessing research projects and programs developed nonetheless. It should be examined, explained (as heuristic), and hopefully improved. Instead, some philosophers make do with what Imre Lakatos presented as his Methodology of Scientific Research Programs. Before that Popper refrained from discussing heuristic, Polanyi left it to the intuitions of scientific leaders and to experts. Kuhn added that they produce paradigms to emulate. Lakatos assumed that researches follow series of theories that they improve as one bunch whose core is more-or-less a Kuhn-style paradigm. If the research program degenerates into decreasingly significant problems, then the core idea behind it is on its way to being rejected. It is rejected when a better alternative to it appears. He claimed that this idea provides a new rational reconstruction of the history of science. This has raised much objection.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Agassi, Joseph. 1971. Faraday as a natural philosopher.
Agassi, Joseph. 1975. Science in flux.
Bell, Daniel. 1973/1999. The coming of post-industrial society.
Bunge, Mario. 1967–1968. Scientific research, I, The search for systems, II, the search for truth; studies in the foundations, methodology, and philosophy of science.
Koyré, Alexandre. 1968. Newtonian studies.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions.
Lakatos, Imre. 1976. Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery.
Polanyi, Michael. 1958. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy.
Popper, Karl R. 1935. Logik der Forschung.
Popper, Karl R. 1963. Conjectures and refutations.
Price, Derek John de Solla. 1963. Little science, big science.
Russell, Bertrand. 1900. A critical exposition of the philosophy of Leibniz.
Snow, C.P. 1969. The two cultures; and, a second look.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.
Ziman, John. 2000. Real science: What it is and what it means.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agassi, J. (2014). Lakatos on the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs. In: Popper and His Popular Critics. SpringerBriefs in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06587-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06587-8_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06586-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06587-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)