Advertisement

LORecommendNet: An Ontology-Based Representation of Learning Object Recommendation

  • Noppamas Pukkhem
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 265)

Abstract

One of the most problems facing learners in e-learning system is to find the most suitable course materials or learning objects for their personalized learning space. The main focus of this paper is to extend our previous rule-based representation recommendation system [1] by applying an ontology-based approach for creating a semantic learning object recommendation named ”LORecommendNet”. The ”LORecommendNet” ontology represents the knowledge about learning objects, learner model, semantic mapping rules and their relationship are proposed. In the proposed framework, we demonstrated how the ”LORecommendNet” can be used to enable machines to interpret and process learning object in recommendation system. We also explain how ontological representations play a role in mapping learner to personalized learning object. The structure of “LORecommendNet” extends the semantic web technology, which the representation of each based on an OWL ontology and then on the inference layer, based on SWRL language, making a clarify separation of the program components and connected explicit modules.

Keywords

learning object ontology recommendation semantic web 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pukkhem, N., Vatanawood, W.: Personalised learning object based on multi-agent model and learners’ learning styles. Maejo International Journal of Science and Technology 5(3), 292–311 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alderman, F.L., Barritt, C.: Creating a Reusable Learning Objects Strategy: Leveraging Information and Learning in a Knowledge Economy. Pfeifer Publishing (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    CanCore, Educational guidelines, http://www.cancore.ca/guidelines/1.9/CanCore_guideline_Educational_1.9.pdf (accessed: February 25, 2012)
  4. 4.
    IEEE, Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata (2002), http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf (accessed: January 20, 2012)
  5. 5.
    Felder, R.M., Spurlin, J.: Application, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles. Int. J. Engineering Educational 21, 103–112 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sangineto, E., Capuano, N., Gaeta, M., Micarelli, A.: Adaptive course generation through Learning styles representation. Universal Access in the Information Society 7, 1–23 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    OWL Web Ontolgoy Language Reference, http://www.w3.org/TR/owr-ref, Horrocks, I.: SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language-Combining OWL and RuleML, http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL_2004
  8. 8.
    Pukkhem, N., Vatanawood, W.: Multi-expert guiding based learning object recommendation. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Engineering and Application, Manila, Philippines, pp. 73–77 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Novak, J., Caňas, A.: The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical Report IHMC Cmap Tools 2006-0I, the Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, http://cmap.ihmc.us/publications/researchpapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf (accessed: January 30, 2013)
  10. 10.
    Protégé Ontology and Knowledge Base Framework, http://protege.standford.edu (accessed: May 25, 2013)

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer and Information Technology, Faculty of ScienceThaksin UniversitySongkhlaThailand

Personalised recommendations