Advertisement

Visualizations in Popular Books About Chemistry

  • John K. GilbertEmail author
  • Ana Afonso
Chapter
Part of the Models and Modeling in Science Education book series (MMSE, volume 8)

Abstract

Three issues have gained a higher saliency in discussion about chemical education in recent years. First, the recognition of the importance of chemistry in all aspects of life – personal, social, economic. This has carried implications for the range of themes on which provision of chemical education is desirable. Second, not only has formal chemical education been recognized as being less successful than would be hoped, but also the inadequate provision of informal chemical education for adults has become apparent. Third, there has been a growing awareness that individuals of all ages learn more, and more willingly, from carefully constructed materials in the form of a narrative that is meaningfully augmented by visualisations. This chapter focuses on popular books about chemistry and the role of visualisation in their use in formal chemical education.

Keywords

Textbook Popular books Visual representations Chemistry Formal science education External representations Analogies Symbolic representations Text segmentation Special contiguity principle Tables Figures 

References

  1. Afonso, A., & Gilbert, J. K. (2013). The role of ‘popular’ books in informal chemical education. International Journal of Science Education (B), 3(1), 77–99.Google Scholar
  2. Chittleborough, G., & Treagust, D. (2008). Correct interpretation of chemical diagrams requires transforming from one level of representation to another. Research in Science Education, 38(4), 463–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davidowitz, B., & Chittleborough, G. (2009). Linking the macroscopic and sub-microscopic levels: Diagrams. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Multiple representations in chemical education (pp. 169–194). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dimopoulos, K. (2003). Towards an analysis of visual images in school science textbooks and press articles about science and technology. Research in Science Education, 33, 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eshach, H., & Schwartz, J. (2002). Understanding children’s comprehension of visual displays of complex information. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(4), 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Farquhar, A., & Fraquahar, H. (1891). Economic and industrial delusions: A discourse of the case for protection. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
  7. Florax, M., & Plortzner, R. (2010). What contributes to the split-attention effect? The role of text segmentation, picture labelling, and spatial proximity. Learning and Instruction, 20, 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gabel, D. (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemical research: A look to the future. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 548–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gkitzia, V. (2011). Development and application of suitable criteria for the evaluation of chemical representations in school textbooks. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Han, J. Y., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Chemical inscriptions in Korean textbooks: Semiotics of macro- and micro-world. Science Education, 90(2), 73–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hegarty, M., Carpenter, P., et al. (1991). Diagrams in the comprehension of scientific texts. In R. K. Barr (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 641–668). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  13. Hesse, M. (1966). Models and analogies in science. Indiana: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kozma, R., & Russell, J. (2005). Modelling students becoming chemists: Developing (pp. 121–146). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Leites, M. (2008). Las imagenes sobre enlace quimico usadas en los libros de texto de educacion ecundaria: Analisis deside los resultados de la invetigacion educativa. Ensenanza de las Ciencias, 26(2), 153–176.Google Scholar
  16. MacPherson, S., & Della Sala, S. (2008). Reviews of popular science books. Cortex, 44, 763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Malvern, D. (2000). Mathematical models in science education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  18. Mayer, R. (2002). Using illustrations to promote constructivist learning from science text. In A. Graesser, J. Otero, & J. Leon (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 333–356). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Pozzer, L., & Roth, W.-M. (2003). Prevalence, function, and structure of photographs in high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1089–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pozzer-Ardenghi, L., & Roth, W.-M. (2010). Towards a social practice perspective on the work of reading inscriptions in science texts. Reading Psychology, 31(3), 228–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Scerri, E. R. (2006). The periodic table: Its story and significance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Schnotz, W. (2002). Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schroeder, S. (2011). Teachers’ beliefs, instructional behaviours, and student engagement in learning from texts with instructional pictures. Learning and Instruction, 21, 403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  25. Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire: Graphics Press.Google Scholar
  26. Volk, T. (2008). CO 2 rising: The world’s greatest environmental challenge. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  27. Wainer, H. (1992). Understanding graphs and tables. Educational Researcher, 21(1), 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kings’s College London and The University of ReadingMayford, WokingUK
  2. 2.Department of EducationUniversity of MinhoMinhoPortugal

Personalised recommendations