From Crowdsourced Mapping to Community Mapping: The Post-earthquake Work of OpenStreetMap Haiti

Conference paper


The earthquake that struck Haiti on January 12, 2010 catalyzed a nascent set of efforts in then-emergent “volunteer technology communities.” Among these was the response from OpenStreetMap, a volunteer-driven project that makes geospatial data free and openly available. Following the earthquake, remotely located volunteers rapidly mapped the affected areas to support the aid effort in a remarkable display of crowdsourced work. However, some within that effort believed that the impact and import of open and collaborative mapping techniques could provide much richer value to humanitarian aid work and the long-term development needs of the country. They launched an ambitious project that trialed methods for how to create sustainable and locally-owned community-mapping ecosystems in at-risk regions of the world. This paper describes how an organization that emerged out of the response—the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team—formalized their practices in relation to many different stakeholder needs with the aim for setting a model for how the potential of participatory, community mapping could be realized in Haiti and beyond.


Geospatial Data Humanitarian Work Entrepreneurial Effort Internally Displace Person Haiti Earthquake 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Aoki P (2007) Back stage on the front lines: perspectives and performance in the combat information center. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp 717–726Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Batty P (2010) OpenStreetMap in Haiti Part 1. Accessed Sept 2013 from
  3. 3.
    Budhathoki NR, Haythornthwaite C (2013) Motivation for open collaboration crowd and community models & the case of OpenStreetMap. Am Behav Sci 57(5):548–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burns R, Shanley LA (2013) Connecting grassroots to government for disaster management: workshop summary, Wilson center manuscriptGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Chilton S (2009) Crowdsourcing is radically changing the geodata landscape: case study of openstreetmap. In: Proceedings of the 24th international cartographic conferenceGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dupuy A (2010) Disaster capitalism to the rescue: the international community and Haiti after the earthquake. NACLA Rep Am 43(4):14–19Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dynes R (1969) Organized Behavior in Disaster. Analysis and Conceptualization (No. DRC-Monograph Ser-3). Ohio StateGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elwood S, Goodchild M, Sui D (2012) Researching volunteered geographic information: spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 102(3):571–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fritz C, Mathewson J (1957) Convergence behavior in disasters: a problem in social control. Committee on disaster studies national academy of sciences NRC, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Greenwood D, Levin M (2007) Introduction to action research: social research for social change. London, Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hagen E (2011) Mapping change: community information empowerment in Kibera. Innovations Technol Governance Globalization 6(1):69–94CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haklay M (2010) How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and ordnance survey datasets. Env Plann B: Plann Des 37(4):682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haklay M (2010b). Haiti—further comparisons and the usability of geographic information in emergency situations.
  15. 15.
    Harvard Humanitarian Initiative (HHI) (2011) Disaster relief 2.0: the future of information sharing in humanitarian emergencies. Washington, D.C. and Berkshire, UK: UN Foundation & Vodafone Foundation Technology PartnershipGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hughes, A, Palen, L, Sutton, J, Liu, S, & Vieweg, S. 2008. “Site-Seeing” in Disaster: An Examination of On-Line Social Convergence. In: Proceedings of ISCRAMGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Human Rights Watch (HRW) (2011) World Report 2011. Seven Stories Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Keegan V (2010) Meet the Wikipedia of the mapping world. Guardian unlimited. -open-source-victor-keegan
  19. 19.
    Kendra JM, Wachtendorf T (2003) Reconsidering convergence and converger: legitimacy in response to the world trade center disaster. Terrorism Disaster New Threats, New Ideas Res Soc Probl Pub Policy 11:97–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lin Yu-Wei (2011) A qualitative enquiry into OpenStreetMap making. New Rev Hypermedia Multimedia 17(1):53–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    MapAction. (2013) Map catalog: Philippines typhoons, Sept 2009
  22. 22.
    Maron,M (2007). State of the map!
  23. 23.
    Maron M (2009a). OpenStreetMap at the camp roberts disaster response experiments.
  24. 24.
    Maron M (2009b). MapAction uses OpenStreetMap for Philippines response.
  25. 25.
    Maron M (2010). Haiti OpenStreetMap response.
  26. 26.
    Mashhadi A, Quattrone G, Capra L (2013) Putting ubiquitous crowd-sourcing into context. In: Proceedings of CSCW, pp 611–622Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meier P, Brodock K (2008) Crisis mapping Kenya’s election violence: comparing mainstream news, citizen journalism and Ushahidi. Manuscript from the harvard humanitarian initiativeGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Munro R (2013) Crowdsourcing and the crisis-affected community. Info Retrieval 16(2):210–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    OpenStreetMap (2009) State of the map
  30. 30.
    OpenStreetMap (2010) Hot Haiti strategy and proposal. Accessed Sept 2013 from
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
    OpenStreetMap (2013) Mailing lists.
  33. 33.
    Palen L, Liu S (2007) Citizen communications in crisis: anticipating a future of ICT-supported participation. In: Proceedings of CHI 2007, pp 727–736Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Poorthuis A, Zook M (2013) Spaces of volunteered geographic information. In: Adams P, Craine J, Dittmer J (eds.) Ashgate research companion on geographies of mediaGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Roche S, Propeck-Zimmermann E, Mericskay B (2013) GeoWeb and crisis management: Issues and perspectives of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal 78(1):21–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sheller M (2013) The islanding effect: post-disaster mobility systems and humanitarian logistics in Haiti. Cult Geogr 20(2):185–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Soden R (2010) Humanitarian OpenStreetMap team report from Haiti.
  38. 38.
    Star SL (2013) This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci Technol Hum Values 35:601–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Star SL, Griesemer J (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’, and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals on Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology. Soc Stud Sci 19:387–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Starbird K (2013) Delivering patients to sacré coeur: collective intelligence in digital volunteer communities. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp 801–810Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Starbird, K., & Palen, L. 2011. “Voluntweeters:” Self-Organizing by Digital Volunteers in Times of Crisis. Proceedings of CHI, 1071-1080Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Starbird K, Palen L (2013) Working and sustaining the virtual “disaster desk.” In: Proceedings of CSCW, pp 491–502Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Turner A, (2010) OpenStreetMap Haiti.
  44. 44.
  45. 45.
    Wulf V, Misaki K, Atam M, Randall D, Rohde M (2013) ‘On the ground’ in Sidi Bouzid: investigating social media use during the Tunisian revolution. In: Proceedings of CSCW, pp 1409–1418Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zook M, Graham M, Shelton T, Gorman S (2010) Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: a case study of the Haitian earthquake. World Health Med Policy 2:2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Colorado BoulderBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations