Abstract
In a development that Charles Dickens might have appreciated, it is the best of times and the worst of times in the US for undocumented immigrant children and young adults. At the macro level, there is an unmistakable anti-immigrant policy trend evident in various state legislatures, resulting in partially discredited and punitive statutes and policies in several states, from Arizona to Alabama and Georgia. A national barometer of interest in this larger issue is the scorecard of how many state legislatures have considered legislation on immigration-related issues. The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) issues a report twice each year that details the state-level immigration legislation. This discouraging report card shows that state legislators in 46 states and the District of Columbia introduced 948 bills and resolutions related to immigrants and refugees from January 1 to June 30, 2012. This was a 40 % drop from the peak of 1592 in the first half of 2011, although the state legislatures in Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, and Texas did not meet in regular session in 2012. In the first half of 2012, 41 state legislatures enacted 114 bills and adopted 92 immigration-related resolutions for a total of 206, a decrease of 20 % from the 257 laws and resolutions enacted in the same period in 2011. Of course, not all of these statutes were anti-immigrant but the vast majorities were restrictionist. In addition, it appears that the widespread use of E-Verify will lock many states and employers into a required employment verification regime, one sure to be applied against Latinos in the work authorization process. And although there is evidence that the GOP overplayed its anti-immigrant cards in the 2012 federal election and was punished for it, the lessons remain unclear in 2014, and will become clarified only as the contours of Comprehensive Immigration Reform (CIR) make their way through Congress.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AZ vs. HESSA, 427 N.J. Super. 389 (2012)
California Department of Education (2012) Student racial/ethnic makeup for 2010–2011. http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sd/cb/cefstudentracecomp.asp
Congressional Record (2007) 110th Congress, 1st session, vol 153, S13305. Statement by Senator Arlen Specter
Dolan M (2012) Court takes up bid of illegal immigrant to Be Attorney. Los Angeles Times, May 17. LAEXTRA–1
Dynarski S, Scott-Clayton J (2013) Financial aid policy: lessons from research. NBER Working Paper 18710. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. http://www.nber.org/papers/w18710
Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget (2007) Statement of administrative policy: S. 2205-development, relief, and education for Alien Minors Act of 2007. Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC. http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/omb/legislative/sap/110-1/s2205sap-s.pdf
Judicial Council of California (2012) California supreme court to decide whether undocumented immigrant may be admitted to the California State Bar. News release, May 16. http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/oc12-May_16SC.pdf
Keaton P (2012) Public elementary and secondary school student enrollment and staff counts from the common core of data: school year 2010–2011 (NCES 2012-327). US Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2012/2012327.pdf. Retrieved Jan 2014 [Table 2]
Laird L (2013) The dream bar: children living in the United States illegally grow up-and some of them want to be attorneys. Am Bar Assoc J 50–57. http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/the_dream_bar_some_children_living_in_the_united_states_illegally/
Manuel KM, Garvey T (2013) Prosecutorial discretion in immigration enforcement: legal issues. CRS Report R42924. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, Washington, DC, January 17. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42924.pdf
Marquez B, Witte JF (2009) Marquez B, Witte JF (2009) Immigration reform: strategies for legislative action. Forum 7(3):1–28
Martin DA (2012) A defense of immigration-enforcement discretion: the legal and policy flaws in Kris Kobach’s latest crusade. Yale Law J Online 122:167–186. (http://yalelawjournal.org/2012/12/20/martin.html)
McWhorter D (2012) The strange career of Juan Crow. New York Times. June 17, p. SR8
Napolitano J (2009) A discussion on immigration policy with homeland security secretary Janet Napolitano. Filmed November 13. Center for American Progress video, 47:58. http://www.americanprogress.org/events/2009/11/13/16871/a-discussion-on-immigration-policy-with-homeland-security-secretary-janet-napolitano/
National Conference of State Legislatures (2012) 2012 immigration-related laws and resolutions in the states, (Jan 1–June 30, 2012). http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/immig/2012-immigration-related-laws-and-resolutions.aspx. Accessed 12 Feb 2013
Olivas MA (2009) The political economy of the DREAM Act and the legislative process. Wayne Law Rev 55(4):1757–1810. (http://waynelawreview.org/?p=993)
Olivas MA (2012) Dreams deferred, deferred action, prosecutorial discretion, and the vexing case(s) of DREAM Act Students. William Mary Bill Rights J 21(2):463–547. (http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj/vol21/iss2/6/)
Preston J (2009) White house plan on immigration includes legal status. New York Times. Nov 14, p. A10
Preston J (2012) Court rulings help illegal immigrants’ college-bound children. New York Times. Jan 28, p. A1
Preston J (2013) Senators offer a new blueprint for immigration. New York Times. Jan 28, p. A1
Raab J (2011) Rick Perry’s tuition policy, immigrants’ dream: why students need a path to citizenship. New York Daily News. Sept 30. http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/rick-perry-tuition-policy-immigrants-dream-students-path-citizenship-article-1.958737
Schumer C (2009) Chuck Schumer addresses 2009 immigration law and policy conference co-sponsored by MPI. Filmed June 24. Vimeo video 31:35. http://vimeo.com/album/154759/video/5879236
Semple K (2013) Advocates struggle to reach immigrants eligible for deferred action. New York Times, Dec 9, 2013, p. A22
Solis D (2013) Taking steps to stay here: hundreds of illegal immigrants in Dallas area get advice on applying for work-permit. Dallas Morning News. Jan 27, p. 1B
Texas Education Agency (2011) Enrollment in Texas Public Schools 2010–2011. Document No. GE12 601 01. Texas Education Agency, Austin. Oct. http://www.tea.state.tx.us/acctres/enroll_index.html
Tilsley A (2012) Dream Act passes in Maryland. InsideHigherEd.com, Nov 7. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/11/07/maryland-passes-dream-act
Wadhia SS (2013) My great FOIA adventure and discoveries of deferred action cases at ICE. Georget Immigr Law Rev 27:345–385. (Figure 21, estimates of age cohort)
Winograd B (2013a) Federal judge leaves anti-DACA lawsuit hanging by a thread. Immigration Impact (blog), Jan 30. http://immigrationimpact.com/2013/01/30/federal-judge-leaves-anti-daca-lawsuit-hanging-by-a-thread
Winograd B (2013b) Breaking: administration confirms DACA recipients are ‘Lawfully Present.’ Immigration Impact (blog), Jan 18. http://immigrationimpact.com/2013/01/18/breaking-administration-confirms-daca-recipients-are-lawfully-present/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Olivas, M. (2014). US Immigration Policy in the Twenty-First Century, with Special Reference to Education: Examining Crosscurrents of Nativist and Accommodationist Policymaking. In: Payan, T., de la Garza, E. (eds) Undecided Nation. Immigrants and Minorities, Politics and Policy, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06480-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06480-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06479-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06480-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)