Advertisement

The Political Pursuit of Happiness: A Popperian Perspective on Layard’s Happiness Policy

  • Aloys PrinzEmail author
  • Björn Bünger
Chapter
  • 1.3k Downloads
Part of the Happiness Studies Book Series book series (HAPS)

Abstract

For Richard Layard, happiness should constitute the guiding principle of public policy. However, it remains unclear whether there is a convincing justification for such kinds of happiness policies. To shed some light on this issue, Layard’s battle against status competition for enhancing happiness is evaluated by applying a Popperian perspective. That is, we apply Popper’s evaluation scheme by determining whether Layard’s position meets four criteria derived from Karl Popper’s philosophy. At the normative level, status competition cannot be considered only a social vice, but also a social virtue. At the epistemological level, Layard’s policy advice seems problematic, as it is based on the assumption that the government is able to differentiate between positive and negative incentives arising from status competition. Regarding the political level, Layard argues that counteracting the effects of the status race is a major objective of public policy. Layard is optimistic that the issue of consensus among citizens can be solved, but it remains unclear whether this optimism is justified. He is also confident that the problems of implementation can be overcome. However, there may be a general incompatibility between the level of coercion and status competition, since the latter is deeply rooted in human nature. To sum up, there is neither a convincing argument for stricter measures to combat status competition, nor does political enforcement seem feasible with voters who presumably suffer from ‘false’ preferences. Moreover, there is no clear-cut normative argument to combat status competition from a Popperian perspective. As a more general result, a reorientation of public policy towards happiness, as recommended by Layard, does not seem advisable.

Keywords

Politics and the pursuit of happiness Layard’s happiness policy Happiness and public policy Happiness of the community Economic happiness research Happiness-related indicators of national well-being Karl Popper 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Johnny Søraker for his most instructive and concise comments on this paper. A previous version of this paper was presented at the Meeting of the European Public Choice Society 2011 in Rennes and at the conference ‘Well-Being in Contemporary Society’ (wics 2012), University of Twente, 2012. The authors also wish to thank the participants at their respective conference sessions and especially Martin Rode and two anonymous referees. The authors are additionally grateful to Brian Bloch for his comprehensive editing of the manuscript. The usual disclaimer applies with regard to the content.

References

  1. Aidt, T. S. (2000). Economic voting and information. Electoral Studies, 19, 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benjamin, D. J. & Laibson, D. I. (2003). Good policies for bad governments: behavioral political economy. Draft paper May 27, 2003. http://199.169.205.158/economic/conf/conf48/papers/benjamin_laibson.pdf. Accessed 25 Sep 2013.
  3. Bok, D. (2010). The politics of happiness—what governments can learn from the new research on well-being. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bruni, L., & Porta, P. L. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook on the economics of happiness. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  5. Bünger, B. (2010). The demand for relational goods: Empirical evidence from the European Social Survey. International Review of Economics, 57, 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bünger, B., & Prinz, A. (2010). Staatliche Glücksförderung? Karl Popper, Richard Layard und das Rauchen. Ordo. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 61, 169–190.Google Scholar
  7. Burns, G. W. (2010). Gross national happiness—a gift from Bhutan to the world. In R. Biswas-Diener (Ed.), Positive psychology as social change (pp. 73–87). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donohue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Regulation for conservatives: Behavioral economics and the case for “asymmetric paternalism”. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151, 101–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Congleton, R. D. (1989). Efficient status seeking: Externalities, and the evolution of status games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 11, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corneo, G. (2002). The efficient side of progressive income taxation.European Economic Review, 46, 1359-1368.Google Scholar
  11. Cummins, R. A., Anna, A. L. D., Lau, D. M., & Stokes, M. A. (2009). Encouraging governments to enhance the happiness of their nation: Step 1: Understand subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 91, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Prycker, V. (2010). Happiness on the political agenda? Pros and cons. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 585–603.Google Scholar
  13. Duncan, G. (2005). What do we mean by “happiness”? The relevance of subjective wellbeing to social policy. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 25, 16–31.Google Scholar
  14. Duncan, G. (2007). After happiness. Journal of Political Ideologies, 12, 85–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duncan, G. (2010). Should happiness-maximization be the goal of government? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Easterlin, R. (2002). Happiness in economics. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  17. Fennell, L. A. (2006). Hyperopia in public finance. In E. L. McCaffery & J. Slemrod (Eds.), Behavioral public finance (pp. 141–171). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  18. Frank, R. H. (1985). Choosing the right pond. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Frank, R. H. (2005). Positional externalities cause large and preventable welfare losses. The American Economic Review, 95, 137–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frank, R. H. (2008). Should public policy respond to positional externalities? Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1777–1786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freeman, S. (2012). Original position. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/original-position/. Accessed 28 Sept 2013.
  22. Frey, B. S. (2010). Happiness. A revolution in economics. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Maximizing happiness? German Economic Review, 1, 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2009). Should national happiness be maximized? In A. K. Dutt & B. Radcliff (Eds.), Happiness, economics and politics—towards a multi-disciplinary approach (pp. 301–323). Cheltenham, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  25. Griffith, T.D. (2005). Progressive taxation and happiness.Boston College Law Review,45,1-36.Google Scholar
  26. Harsanyi, J. (1997). Utilities, preferences, and substantive goods. Social Choice and Welfare, 14, 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jaeger, W. K. (2004). Status seeking and social welfare: Is there virtue in vanity? Social Science Quarterly,85,361-379.Google Scholar
  28. Jerome, J. K. (1994 [1889]). Three man in a boat (to say nothing of the dog). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  29. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2004). Toward national well-being accounts. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 94, 429–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kliemt, H. (1986). The veil of insignificance. European Journal of Political Economy, 2(3), 333–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Konrad, K. (1990). Statuspräferenzen: soziobiologische Ursachen, Statuswettrüsten und seine Besteuerung. Kyklos, 43, 249–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Layard, R. (1980). Human satisfaction and public policy. Economic Journal, 90, 737–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness—lessons from a new science. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  35. Layard, R. (2006). Happiness and public policy: A challenge to the profession. The Economic Journal, 116, C24–C33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Layard, R. (2009). The greatest happiness principle: It’s time has come. In S. Griffiths & R. Reeves (Eds.), Well-being. How to lead the good life and what government should do to help (pp. 92–106). London: The Social Market Foundation.Google Scholar
  37. Lelkes, O. (2013). Minimising misery: A new strategy for public policies instead of maximising happiness? MPRA paper no. 45435.Google Scholar
  38. Loewenstein, G., & Haisley, E. C. (2007). The economist as therapist: Methodological ramifications of ‘light’ paternalism. http://ssrn.com/abstract=962472. Accessed 18 March 2010.
  39. Mayerfeld, J. (1999). Suffering and moral responsibility. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Miller, E. (1975). Status goods and luxury taxes.American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 34, 141-154.Google Scholar
  41. Ng, Y.-K., & Ho, L. S. (2006). Happiness and public policy—theory, case studies and implications. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ott, J. (2006). Call for policy shift to happiness: Review of Richard Layard’s “Happiness; Lessons from a new science”. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 118–126.Google Scholar
  43. Ott, J. (2010). Greater happiness for a greater number: Some non-controversial options for governments. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 631–647.Google Scholar
  44. Popper, K. R. (1966). The Open Society and its enemies I: The spell of Plato (5th ed., revised), Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Popper, K. R. (1969). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge (3rd ed., revised), London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  46. Popper, K. R. (1974). The Open Society and its enemies II: The high tide of prophecy: Hegel, Marx, and the aftermath. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Popper, K. R. (1994). Toleration and intellectual responsibility (Stolen from Xenophanes and from Voltaire). In In search of a better world. Lectures and essays from thirty years (K. R. Popper, Ed., L. J. Bennett, Trans., pp. 188–203). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Popper, K. R. (2012). Public and private values. In J. Shearmur & P. N. Turner (Eds.), Karl Popper: After the Open Society: Selected social and political writings (pp. 118–131). London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Prinz, A. (2013). Should the state care for the happiness of its citizens? In H. Brockmann & J. Delhey (Eds.), Human happiness and the pursuit of maximization . (pp. 177–190). doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6609-9_13. Springer: Dordrecht.
  50. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Shrotryia, V. K. (2006). Happiness and development—Public policy initiatives in the Kingdom of Bhutan. In Y.-K. Ng & L. S. Ho (Eds.), Happiness and public policy—theory, case studies and implications (pp. 193–208). Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  52. Shughart, W. F, I. I. (2004). Is voting rational? In C. K. Rowley & F. Schneider (Eds.), The encyclopedia of public choice (Vol. II, pp. 326–329). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kulwer.Google Scholar
  53. Sobel, R. S., & Wagner, G. A. (2004). Expressive voting and redistribution. In C. K. Rowley & F. Schneider (Eds.), The encyclopedia of public choice (Vol. II, pp. 245–247). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kulwer.Google Scholar
  54. Sugden, R. (1989). Maximizing Social Welfare: Is it the government’s business? In A. Hamlin & P. Pettit (Eds.), The good polity—normative analysis of the state (pp. 69–86). Oxford, New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  55. Sugden, R. (2004). The opportunity criterion: Consumer sovereignty without the assumption of coherent preferences. American Economic Review, 94, 1014–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sugden, R. (2008). Why incoherent preferences do not justify paternalism. Constitutional Political Economy, 19, 226–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Libertarian paternalism. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 93, 175–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge—improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  59. van Praag, B. M. S., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2008). Happiness quantified—a satisfaction calculus approach (revised ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business and EconomicsUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations