Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conclusions and Recommendations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Legal Principles for Combatting Cyberlaundering

Part of the book series: Law, Governance and Technology Series ((LGTS,volume 19))

  • 944 Accesses

Abstract

All preceding chapters of this treatise has been concerned with the problem of cyberlaundering and how to combat it. Like other technological advancements, a problem of the magnitude of cyberlaundering characterizes these modern times, defining the extent of modern technology. What is alarming about cyberlaundering is that it continues to elude understanding. This is partly because it is not subject to any regulatory framework. There is also no clear-cut method on how to go about prosecuting cases of cyberlaundering. Despite its increasing prevalence, cyberlaundering has not prompted intervention on the side of the authorities concerned, notwithstanding its damaging effects on the economy, both nationally and internationally. Existing laws, without being adapted, are ill-suited for use against cyberlaundering.

This chapter thus concludes the discussion on the legal regulation of cyberlaundering. It reiterates the triple-pillar combat strategy, and offers additional recommendations which serve to further the anti-cyberlaundering (ACL) campaign.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cf detailed discussion of this principle in Chapter 4, paragraph 4.5.

  2. 2.

    Cf discussion in Chapter 4, paragraph 4.5.2.

  3. 3.

    Further proof of this is evident in the fact that prosecutors are not able to find the trail of cyberlaundering in various crimes they investigate, which blatantly bear the cyberlaundering elements. Cf discussion in Chapter 5, paragraph 5.4.

  4. 4.

    Cf discussion on the effects of cyberlaundering in Chapter 1, paragraph 1.2.1.

  5. 5.

    Cf discussion in Chapter 5, paragraph 5.5.

  6. 6.

    For discussion on Interpol in relation to cyberlaundering, see Chapter 3, paragraph 3.2.1.

  7. 7.

    For discussion on the FATF in relation to the phenomenon of cyberlaundering, see discussion in Chapter 3, paragraph 3.2.1.

  8. 8.

    Cf Financial Action Task Force (2006, p. 2) and Financial Action Task Force (2012d, p. 3).

  9. 9.

    Cf discussion in Chapter 4, paragraph 4.4.1.

  10. 10.

    See Financial Action Task Force (2012a) ‘International Standards on Combatting Money Laundering and The Financing of Terrorism and Proliferation’ <http://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/recommendations/pdfs/FATF%20Recommendations%20(approved%20February%202012)%20reprint%20May%202012%20web%20version.pdf>. [accessed on 7 June 2013].

  11. 11.

    For discussion on the BCBS in relation to cyberlaundering, see Chapter 3, paragraph 3.2.1.

  12. 12.

    Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2001a, p. 9). Cf discussion in paragraph 3.2.1.

  13. 13.

    For discussion on the Egmont Group in relation to cyberlaundering, see Chapter 3, paragraph 3.2.1.

  14. 14.

    For ways in which the FIUs can help with the detection and eventual prevention of cyberlaundering, see discussion in Chapter 4.

  15. 15.

    Pollitzer (2001, p. 1). Cf Presley (1979, p. 809).

  16. 16.

    In hindsight, this is also reminiscent of the strong words of Mark Antony’s character in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar: ‘the evil that men do lives after them; the good is oft interred within their bones.’ Shakespeare (1994, p. 42).

References

International Instruments

  • Agreement on the Swiss Bank Code of Conduct with Regard to the Exercise of Due Diligence. 28 January 1998. <http://www.swissbanking.org/en/home/>. Accessed 11 Jan. 2013.

  • Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime adopted by the Council of Europe on 8 November 2001 and came into force on 1 July 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime: Additional Protocol to the Convention adopted by the Council of Europe on 7 November 2002 and came into force on 1 March 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime, adopted by the Council of Europe on 8 November 1990, and entered into force on 1 September 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and on the Financing of Terrorism, adopted by the Council of Europe on 16 May 2005, and came into force on 1 December 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe: Council Directive 2002/38/EC on the value added tax arrangements applicable to radio and television broadcasting services and certain electronically supplied services, adopted by the Parliamentary Assembly on 07 May 2002 and came into force on 01 July 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe: Council Directive 2002/58/EC on the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws adopted by the Parliamentary Assembly on 12 July 2002 and came into force on 31 July 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe: Council Directive 2005/60/EC on the prevention and use of financial systems for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing adopted by the Parliamentary Assembly on 26 October 2005 and came into force on 25 November 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe: Council Directive 2009/110/EC on the taking up, pursuit and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money institutions, adopted by the Parliamentary Assembly on 16 September 2009 and came into force on 30 October 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe: Council Directive 2009/136/EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services, adopted by the Parliamentary Assembly on 25 November 2009 and came into force on 18 December 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe: Measures Against the Transfer and Safekeeping of Funds of Criminal Origin: Recommendation No R (80) and Explanatory Memorandum, adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 27 June 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council: Council Framework Decision 2005/222/JHA on attacks against information systems adopted by the European Parliament on 24 February 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 adopted by the European Parliament on 26 October 2005 and came into force on 15 December 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union Telecommunications Reform Package COM (2007) 697 and COD/2007/0247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter-American Convention against Terrorism, adopted by the General Assembly of the Organisation of American States on 6 March 2002, and entered into force on 7 October 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Model Law on Electronic Commerce 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Convention against Corruption adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 31 October 2003 and entered into force on 15 December 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, which was adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 7 December 1987, and entered into force on 11 November 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime which was adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 15 November 2000, and entered into force on 29 September 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 9 December 1999, and entered into force on 10 April 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States-Switzerland Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty 27 UST 2019, TIAS 8302, signed on 23 May 1973 and entered into force on 23 Jan. 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Official Reports

Domestic laws Australia

  • Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act of 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Belgium

  • Belgian Criminal Code (Wet houdende de voorafgaande title van het Wetboek van Strafvordering) 2012.

    Google Scholar 

Canada

  • Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (S.C. 2000, c. 17).

    Google Scholar 

Germany

  • Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Act of 2008 (Gesetz zur Ergänzung der Bekämpfung der Geldwäsche und der Terrorismusfinanzierung—GwBekErgG).

    Google Scholar 

  • Banking Act of 1998 (Kreditwesengesetz in der Fassung der Bekannt mach ung vom 9. September 1998—BGBl. I S. 2776; Gesetz über das Kreditwesen Kreditwesengesetz—KWG).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Data Protection Act of 2001 (Bundesdatenschutzgesetz—BDSG).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedom of Information Act of 2005 (Informationsfreiheitsgesetz).

    Google Scholar 

  • German Criminal Code of 1998 (Strafgesetzbuch—StGB).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppression of Illegal Drug Trafficking and other Manifestations of Organized Crime Act of 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telecommunications Act of 2004 (Telekommunikationsgesetz—TKG).

    Google Scholar 

Malaysia

Netherlands

Nigeria

Singapore

South Africa

  • Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 22 of 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Gambling Act 7 of 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regulation of the Interception of Communication and the Provision of Related-Information Act 70 of 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Tasmania

United Kingdom

United States of America Federal Laws

  • Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annuzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act of 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banking Act of 1933 (Public Law Number: 73-66).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, 31 United States Code 1051 (Public law number 99-570).

    Google Scholar 

  • Code of Federal Regulations [C.F.R.].

    Google Scholar 

  • Computer Fraud and Abuse Act 1984, 18 United States Code 1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crimes and Criminal Procedure Act of 1948, 18 United States Code 645; 683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyber Security Enhancement Act of 2002, 18 United States Code 5710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998, 17 United States Code 2860 (Public Law 105-304).

    Google Scholar 

  • District of Colombia Code [D.C. Code].

    Google Scholar 

  • Electronic Communications Privacy Act 1986, 18 United States Code 2510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Rules of Evidence Act of 1975, Title 28, United States Code.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Wire Act 87 of 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, Title 15 United States Code, Public Law 95-213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraud and Related Activity in Connection with Computers Act 1986, 18 United States Code 1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intelligence Reform & Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Infrastructure Protection Act 1996, 2 United States Code 3488.

    Google Scholar 

  • NV Senate Bill 82-75th (BDR 14-266), adopted on 1 July 2009 by the House of Senate, Nevada, United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Money Laundering and Financial Crimes Strategy Act of 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Money Laundering Control Act of 1986, 18 United States Code 1956, 1957 (Public law number 99-570).

    Google Scholar 

  • Money Laundering Suppression Act of 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1982, Title 12, United States Code.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing By Providing the Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (Public law number 107-56).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Code [U.S.C].

    Google Scholar 

  • Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required To Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act 115, Stat. 272 of 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkansas Criminal Code (Annex) of 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connecticut General Statute (Annex) of 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • North Carolina General Statute of 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michigan Compiled Laws, Act of 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • SB-82 (NV Senate Bill 82-75th, BDR 14-266) of Nevada, which came into effect on 1 July 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Court Cases International Court of Justice

Nigeria

  • The Federal Republic of Nigeria v Joshua Chibi Dariye [2007] EWHC 708 (Ch).

    Google Scholar 

United Kingdom

  • Butera v Director of Public Prosecutions for the State of Victoria, (1987) 164 CLR 180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julian Paul Assange v. Swedish Prosecution Authority [2013] UKSC 22.

    Google Scholar 

United States of America

  • Aguimatang v. California State Lottery (1991) 234 Cal.App.3d 769 [286 Cal.Rptr. 57]

    Google Scholar 

  • California Bankers Association v. Schultz 39L ed 2d 812 (1974) n5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haag v. United States, 485 F.3d 1, 3 (1st Circuit) (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Shoe Co. v. Washington 326 US 310 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfect 10, INC v. Megaupload, Kim Schmitz 11cv0191—IEG (BLM) (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States of America v. Briscoe, 896 F.2d 1476, 1494 (7th Circuit) (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States of America v. E-Gold Ltd, Douglas Jackson, Barry K. Downey, and Reid A. Jackson, 521 F.3d 411, 417 (D.C. Circuit) (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States of America v. Foster, 986 F.2d 541 (D.C. Circuit) (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States of America v. Fujii, 301 F.3d 535, 539 (7th Circuit) (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States of America v. Hamilton, 413 F.3d 1138, 1142-43 (10th Circuit) (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States of America v. Khorozian, 333 F.3d 498, 506 (3rd Circuit) (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States of America v. Nippon Paper Industries Co. Ltd 109 F. 3d 1, 7 (1st Circuit) (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States of America v. Scheinberg et al. 336 (10th Circuit) (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States of America v. Scholle 553 F.2d 1109 (8th Circuit) (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States of America v. Vela, 673 F.2d 86, 90 (5th Circuit) (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States of America v. Washington, 498 F.3d 225, 230-31 (4th Circuit) (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States of America v. $ 124,700 in U.S. Currency, 05-3295 (8th Circuit) (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States of America v. $ 4,255, 625, 39 551 F Supp 314 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

Indictment Orders

  • The United States District Court for The District of Colombia, Holding a Criminal Term, Grand Jury Sworn in on May 11 2006, United States of America v. E-gold, Ltd Gold and Silver Reserve, INC, Douglas L. Jackson, Barry K. Downey, and Reid A. Jackson as Defendants (Criminal No. 07-109): Indictment, p. 3. <http://www.justice.gov/criminal/ceos/Press%20Releases/DC%20egold%20indictment.pdf>. Accessed 13 Feb. 2013.

  • In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division, United States of America v. Kim Dotcom, Megaupload Ltd, Vestor Ltd, Fin Batato, Julius Bencko, Sven Echternach, Mathias Ortmann, Andrus Nomm, and Bram van der Kolk as Defendants (Criminal No. 1:12CR3): Indictment, dated 5 January 2012. <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204616504577171180266957116.html>. Accessed 13 Feb. 2013.

Books

  • Aas, K. F. 2007 Globalization and crime. Cornwall: TJ International Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Law Institute. 1987. Restatement of the law (third) foreign relations law of the United States. vol. 2. Philadelphia: American Law Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alghamdi, A. M. 2011. The law of E-Commerce: E-Contracts, E-Business. Bloomington: AuthorHouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, M. 2011. Complete guide to internet privacy, anonymity and security. New York: Nerrel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beare, M. E. 2005. Critical reflections on transnational organized crime, money laundering and corruption. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, B. 1988. Introduction to cryptography. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermann, G. 2003. Transnational litigation. Minnesota: Thomson West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blunden, B. 2001. The money launderers, how they do it, and how to catch them at it…. Gloucestershire: Management Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boni, W., and G. L. Kovavcich. 2000. Netspionage: The global threat to information. Woburn: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, S. 2007. Law in an era of smart technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buergenthal, T., and S. D. Murphy. 2002. Public international law in a nutshell. Minnesota: West Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caloyannides, M. A. 2004. Privacy protection and computer forensics. 2nd ed. Massachusetts: Arctech House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassese, A. 2005. International law. 2nd ed. Hampshire: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E. 2004. Digital evidence and computer crime: Forensic science, computers and the internet. 2nd ed. Academic: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E. 2011a. Digital evidence and computer crime: Forensic science, computers and the internet. 2nd ed. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cater, B. E., and A. S. Weiner. 2011. International law. 6th ed. New York: Aspen Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, J. 2010. Principles of cybercrime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, K., and D. Hermann, eds. 2011. Virtual worlds and criminality. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, F. 2009. Digital forensic evidence examination. Livermore: Fred Cohen & Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cryer, R., H. Friman, D. Robinson, and E. Wilmshurst. 2010. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, M. 2005. Brute force: Cracking the data encryption standard. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, G. 2010. The law of cybercrimes and their investigations. Washington: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demetis, D. S. 2010. Technology and anti-money laundering: A systems theory and risk-based approach. Cheltenham: Edward Edgar Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fafinski, S. 2009. Computer misuse: Response, regulation and the law. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. 2009. The ascent of money: A financial history of the world. London: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forget, L., and V. S. Hocevar. 2004. Financial intelligence units: An overview. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund Publication Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The social virtues. London: Hamish Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnell, S. 2002. Cybercrime: Vandalizing the information society. London: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geva, B. 1992. The law of electronic funds transfers. New York: Matthew Bender & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, G. 2010. The law of evidence. By a late learned judge. The third edition, corrected; and many new references added. With a complete table to the whole. London: Gale, ECCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, W. 1995. Dirty money: The evolution of money laundering counter-measures. Strasburg: Council of Europe Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabosky, P., and R. Smith. 1998. Crime in the digital age, controlling telecommunications and cyberspace illegalities. Sydney: The Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gragido, W., and K. Pirc. 2011. Cybercrime and espionage: An analysis of subversive multi-vector threats. Burlington: Elsevier, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grama, J. L. 2010. Legal issues in information security. Sudbury: Jones and Berlett Learning, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, T. S., L. M. Samuel, W. Grant, and L. Grey. 2009. Stolen assets recovery: A good practice guide for non-conviction-based asset forfeiture. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallam-Baker, P. 2008. The Dotcrime Manifesto: How to stop internet crime. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, L., L. F. Damrosch, S. D. Murphy, and H. Smit. 2009. International law: Case and material. 6th ed. New York: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, G. E. 2010. Cybercrime: An introduction to an emerging phenomenon. Columbus: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterseer, K. 2002. Criminal finance: The political economy of money laundering in a comparative legal context. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopton, D. 2009. Money laundering: A concise guide for all businesses. 2nd ed. London: Gower Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolicoeur, P. 1999. Introduction to biometry. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, N. 2005. The washing machine: How money laundering and terrorist financing soil us. London: Centinage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J. 2006. Suppressing terrorist financing and money laundering. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koops, B, and S. W. Brenner. 2006. Cybercrime and jurisdiction: A global survey (Information Technology and Law Series). The Hague: T.M.C Asser Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kshetri, N. 2010. The global cybercrime industry: Economic, institutional and strategic perspectives. Springer: Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankhorst, F., and H. Nelen. 2003. Dilemmas facing lega proffessional and notaries in their professional relationship with criminal clients, falcone project. Amsterdam: Vrije University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassila, D., et al. 2011. Electronic funds transfer. New York: Matthew Bender & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilley, P. 2006. Dirty dealing: The untold truth about global money laundering, international crime and terrorism. 3rd ed. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madinger, J., and S. A. Zalopany. 1999. Money laundering: A guide for criminal investigators. 1st ed. Florida: CRS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madinger, J. 2012. Money laundering: A guide for criminal investigators. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcella, A. J., and R. S. Greenfields. 2002. Cyber forensics: A field manual for collecting examining and preserving evidence of computer crimes. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKemmish, R. 1999. What is forensic computing? Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice. vol. 118. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuade, S. C. 2006. Understanding and managing cybercrime. Boston: Person Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molander, R. C., D. A. Mussington, and P. A. Wilson. 1998. Cyberpayments and money laundering: Problems and promise. Santa Monica: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molly, D., and C. S. Parker. 2010. Understanding computers: Today and tomorrow. Boston: Cengage Learning Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. 2011. Cybercrime, second edition: Investigating high-technology computer crime. Oxford: Elsevier Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S. D. 2006. Principles of international law. Minnesota: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussington, D. A., P. A. Wilson, and R. C. Molander. 1998. Exploring money laundering vulnerabilities through emerging cyberspace technologies: A Carribean-based exercise. Santa Monica: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naím, M. 2005. Illicit: How smugglers, traffickers, and copycats are hijacking the global economy. New York: Anchor books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B., A. Philips, and C. Stuart. 2010. Guide to computer forensics and investigations. 3rd ed. Boston: Course Technology, Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, G. R., and R. V. Clarke. 2003. Superhighway robbery: Preventing e-commerce crime. Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissenbaum, H. 2009. Privacy in context: Technology, policy and the integrity of social life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paar, C., and J. Pelzl. 2010. Understanding cryptography: A textbook for students and practitioners. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D. 1976. Crime by computer. New York: Charles Scribner’s Suns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieth, M., ed. 2002. Financing of terrorism: Following the money. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieth, M., and G. Aiolfi, eds. 2004. A comparative guide to anti-money laundering, a critical analysis of systems in Singapore, Switzerland, the UK and the USA. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillai, K., and A. Julian. 2008. Prevention of money laundering legal and financial issues. New Delhi: The Indian Law Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichel, P., ed. 2005. Handbook of transnational crime and justice. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter, P., and E. M. Truman. 2004. Chasing dirty money: The fight against money laundering. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, A., A. Brittson, K. O’Shea, and J. Steele. 2007. Cyber crime investigations: Bridging the gaps between security professionals, law enforcement, and prosecutors. Syngress: Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. R. 1999. Transnational criminal organisations, cybercrime, and money laundering: A handbook for law enforcement officers, auditors, and financial investigators. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rider, B. 1999. The price of laundering dirty money. Cambridge: Jesus College, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. 1998. The laundry men: Inside the world’s third largest business. London: London Pocket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbach, S. 2011. Virtual chaos: Our vulnerability to cyber-crime and how to prevent it. Wilbraham: AuthorMike Ink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. 2010. A history of the internet and the digital future. London: Reaktion Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savona, E. 2000. Responding to money laundering: international perspectives. Amsterdam: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schell, B. H., and C. Martin. 2004. Cyber crime: A reference handbook. Santa Barbara: Contemporary World Issues Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schott, P. A. 2006. Reference Guide to Anti-Money Laundering and the Combating of the Financing of Terrorism. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank/International Money Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, W. 1994. Julius caesar. Auckland: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. N. 2003. International law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shams, H. 2004. Legal globalization: Money laundering law & order cases. Surrey: British Institute of International and Comparative Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelly, G. B., and M. E. Vermaat. 2010. Discovering computers 2011: Living in a digital world, brief. Boston: Cengage Learning Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. D., and P. J. Borchers. 2005. Conflicts: In a nutshell. 3rd ed. Minnesota: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade, R. M. 2004. Software forensics: Collecting evidence from the scene of a digital crime. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyman, C. R. 2002. Criminal law. 4th ed. Durban: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solove, D. J. 2007. The future of reputation, gossip, rumor on the internet. Vail-Ballou Press: New Hampshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solove, D. J. 2011. Nothing to hide: The false tradeoff between privacy and security. London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stessens, G. 2000. Money laundering: A new international law enforcement model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor R. W., T. J. Caeti, K. Loper, E. J. Fritsch, and J. Liederbach. 2006. Digital crime and digital terrorism. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanki, B., ed. 2011. The law of privilege. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theleskaf, D., and P. G. Pereira, eds. 2011. Non-state actors in assets recovery. Bern: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. E. 2011. Money laundering prevention: Deterring, detecting and resolving financial fraud. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hayek, F. 1978. Denationalisation of money—the argument refined. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walden, I. 2007. Computer crimes and digital investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, D. S. 2007. Cybercrime: The transformation of crime in the information age (PCSS-Polity Crime and Society). Polity Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werle, G. 2009. Principles of international criminal law. 2nd ed. The Hague: Asser Press.

    Google Scholar 

Chapters from Books

  • Angers, L. 2004. Combatting cyber-crime: National legislation as a pre-requisite to international cooperation. In Crime and technology: New frontiers for regulations, law enforcement and research, ed. E. U. Savona. The Hague: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, K. K., and H. S. Venter. 2006. An investigation into computer forensic tools. In Cyber forensics: Tools and practice, eds. R. Kumar and B. Jain. Hyderabad: The ICFAI University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassiouni, M. C. 2004. The history of universal jurisdiction and its pace in international law. In Universal jurisdiction: National courts and the prosecution of serious crimes under international law (Pennysylavia Studies in Human Rights), ed. S. Macedo.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylavia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassiouni, M. C., and D. S. Gualtieri. 2000. International and national responses to the globalization of money laundering. In Responding to money laundering: International perspectives, ed. E. Savona. Amsterdam: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busia, G. 2004. Privacy and investigative needs: Progressing from incompatible to complementary positions. In Crime and technology: New frontiers for regulation, law enforcement and research, ed. E. U. Savona. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E. 2011b. Introduction. In Digital evidence and computer crime: Forensic science, computer and the internet. 3rd ed., ed. E. Casey. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E. 2011c. Digital evidence in the courtroom. In Digital evidence and computer crime: Forensic science, computer and the internet. 3rd ed., ed. E. Casey. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E., and G. Palmer. 2004. The investigative process. In Digital evidence and computer crime: Forensic science, computers and the internet. 2nd ed., ed. E. Casey. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E., and B. Schatz. 2011. Conducting digital investigations. In Digital evidence and computer crime: Forensic science, computer and the internet. 3rd ed., ed. E. Casey. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claus, K. 2010. Nullum poena nulla poena sine lege. In Max Planck encyclopedia for public international law, ed. Rüdiger Wolfrum. Cologne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, K. 2011. Responsibility under criminal law in virtual worlds. In Virtual worlds and criminality, eds. K. Cornelius and D. Hermann. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. L. 2000. Investigating and prosecuting the proceeds of crime: A common law experience. In Responding to money laundering: International perspectives, ed. E. Savona. Amsterdam: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, M. 2007. Anti-Money laundering regulation and trusts. In Anti-Money laundering: International law and practice, eds. W. H. Muller, C. H. Kalin, and J. G. Goldsworth. West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. 1995. Improved auditing practice. In The regulation and prevention of economic crime internationally, ed. J. Reuvid. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimmt, C. 2011. Virtual worlds as a regulatory challenge: A user perspective. In Virtual worlds and criminality, eds. K. Cornelius and D. Hermann. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koops, B. J., and T. Robinson. 2011. Cybercrime law: A European perspective. In Digital evidence and computer crime: Forensic science, computer and the internet. 3rd ed., ed. E. Casey. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S. 2002. Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege in international criminal law. In The Rome statute of the international criminal court: A commentary, eds. A. Cassese, P. Gaeta, and J. R. W. D. Jones. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodder, A. R. 2011. Conflict resolution in virtual worlds: General characteristics and the 2009 Dutch convictions on virtual theft. In Virtual worlds and criminality, eds. K. Cornelius and D. Hermann. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laue, C. 2011. Crime potential of metaverses. In Virtual worlds and criminality, eds. K. Cornelius and D. Hermann. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, S., and B. Schafer. 2010. The characteristics of digital evidence. In Electronic evidence: Disclosure, discovery and admissibility. 2nd ed., ed. S. Mason. London: Lexis Nexis Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, S., and A. Sheldon. 2010. Proof: Investigations, collection and examination of digital evidence. In Electronic evidence: Disclosure, discovery and admissibility. 2nd ed., ed. S. Mason. London: Lexis Nexis Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C. E., T. H. Robinson, and D. Kwak. 2005. Computer crime in brave new world. In Handbook of Transnational Crime and justice, ed. P. Reichel. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, W. H. 2007a. Anti-Money laundering—a short history. In Anti-Money laundering: International law and practice, eds. W. H. Muller, C. H. Kalin, and J. G. Goldsworth. West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, W. H. 2007b. The egmont Group. In Anti-Money laundering: International law and practice, eds. W. H. Muller, C. H. Kalin, and J. G. Goldsworth. West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulukutlah, H., and M. Ruegg. 2009. The importance of information technology in tracing stolen assets. In Tracing stolen assets: A practitioner’s handbook, ed. Basel Institute of Governance. Basel: Basel Institute of Governance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxman, B. H. 1987. Jurisdiction of states. In Encyclopedia of public international law. 1st ed., ed. R. Berhnardt. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padfield, N. 2004. Country report: Anti-Money laundering rules in the United Kingdom. In A comparative guide to money laundering: a critical analysis of the systems in systems in Singapore, Switzerland, the UK and the USA, eds. M. Pieth and G. Aiolfi. Northampton: Elgar

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieth, M. 2007. The Wolfsberg process. In Anti-Money laundering: International law and practice, eds. W. H. Muller, C. H. Kalin, and J. G. Goldsworth. West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieth, M. 2008. Recovering stolen assets—a new issue. In Recovering stolen assets, ed. M. Pieth. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocar, F. 2004. New challenges for international rules against cybercrime. In Crime and technology: New frontiers for regulation, law enforcement and research, ed. E. Savona. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuvid, J. 1995a. The focus on money laundering. In The regulation and prevention of economic crime internationally, ed. J. Reuvid. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuvid, J. 1995bb. Teeth for regulators and international standards of practice. In The regulation and prevention of economic crime internationally, ed. J. Reuvid. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, P. 1999. Internet payments. In Law of bank payments, eds. M. Brindle and R. Cox. London: Sweet and Maxwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savona, E. U., and M. Migone. 2004. The fox and the hunters: How IC technologies change the crime race. In Crime and technology: New frontiers for regulations, law enforcement and research, ed. E. U. Savona. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi, V. 2005. Macroeconomic implications of money laundering. In Responding to money laundering: International perspectives, ed. E. U. Savona. The Netherlands: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, B. 2007. The impact of money laundering. In Black finance: The economics of money laundering, eds. D. Masciandaro, E. Takats, and B. Unger. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walden, I. 2010. Computer forensics and the presentation of evidence in criminal cases. In Handbook of internet crime, eds. Y. Jewkes and M. Yar. Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yar, M. 2010. The private pricing of internet crime. In Handbook of internet crime, eds. M. Yar and Y. Jewkes. Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Journal Articles

  • Abdullah, M. T., R. Mahmod, A. A. Ab. Gani, M. Z. Abdullah, and A. B. Md. Sultan. 2008. Advances in computer forensics. International Journal of Computing Science and Networking Security 8 (2): 215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, K. 2001. The international anti-money-laundering regime: The role of the financial action task force. Journal of Money Laundering Control 4 (3): 231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford, D. E. 1993. Anti-Money laundering regulations: A burden on financial institutions. North Carolina Journal of International Law & Commercial Regulation 19:143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amedeo, A., M. Bagella, and F. Busato. 2008. Money laundering in a two sector model: Using theory for measurement. CEIS Tor Vergata Research Paper Series 6 (8): 128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atta-Asamoah, A. 2009. Understanding the West African cyber crime process. African Security Review: Organised Crime Trends in Africa 18 (4): 107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebe, N. L., and J. G. Clarke. 2005. A hierarchical, objectives-based framework for the digital investigations process. Digital Investigation 2 (2): 146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. E. 2002. The prosecution of computer crime. Journal of Financial Crime 9 (4): 308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. 2009. Enhancing the understanding of genres of web-based communities: The role of the ecological cognition framework. International Journal of Web-Based Communities 5 (1): 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, S. W., and B. Koops. 2004. Approaches to cybercrime jurisdiction. Journal of High Technology Law 4 (1): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, S. 2004. Is there such a thing as virtual crime? California Criminal Law Review 4 (1): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, B. D., and E. H. Spafford. 2003. Getting physical with the digital investigation process. International Journal of Digital Evidence 2 (2): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E., M. Ferraro, and L. Nguyen. 2009. Investigation delayed is justice denied: Proposals for expediting forensic examinations of digital evidence. Journal of Forensic Science 54 (6): 1353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chawki, M. 2010. Anonymity in cyberspace: Finding the balance between privacy and security. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation 9 (3): 183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudary, K., et al. 2010. Experiences in developing a micro-payment system for peer-to-peer networks. International Journal of Information Technology and Web Engineering 5 (1): 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuah, J. 2000. The new EU directives to regulate electronic money institutions—a critique. Journal of International Banking Law 15 (8): 181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuéller, M. 2003. The tenuous relationship between the fight against money laundering and the disruption of criminal finance. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 93 (2/3): 311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorward, D. J. 1998. Forum non conveniens doctrine and the judicial protection of multinational corporations from forum shopping plaintiffs. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 19 (1): 141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairlie, R. W., and A. Chatterji. 2011. High-technology entrepreneurship in Silicon Valley. World Paper Series, Institute of the Study of Labour (IZA Discussion Paper NO. 5726), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipkowski, W. 2008. Cyberlaundering: An analysis of typologies and techniques. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences 3 (1): 233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. D., and L. M. Murray. 2011. The admissibility of electronic evidence under the federal rules of evidence. Richmond Journal of Law and Technology 16 (2): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, L. 2001. Computer forensics: High-tech law enforcement. IEEE Computer Society’s Computer Magazine 34 (1): 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M., and G. Taylor. 2004. ‘Preventing money laundering or obstructing business? Financial Companies’ Perspectives on ‘Know Your Customer’ Procedures. British Journal of Criminology 44 (4): 584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, J. 2004. The federal framework for internet gambling. Richmond Journal for Technology 10 (3): 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, C. 2001. Auction sites hit hard by electronic crime. InfoWorld 23 (3): 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinsterseer, K. 1997. An economic analysis of money laundering. Journal of Money Laundering Control 1 (6): 154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. J. 1991. Policing money laundering through funds transfers: A critique of regulation under the Bank Secrecy Act. Indiana Law Journal 67 (2): 283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. 2011. The new frontier of money laundering: How terrorist organisations use cyberlaundering to fund their activities, and how governments are trying to stop them. Information and Communications Technology Law 20 (2): 133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M., and M. Levitt. 2010. Tracking Nacro-Terrorist networks: The money trail. Fletcher Forum for World Affairs 34:117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jailani, N., N. F. M. Yatim, Y. Yahya, A. Patel, and M. Othman. 2008. Secure and auditable agent-based e-marketplace framework for mobile users. Computer Standard and Interfaces 1 (30): 237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joinson, A. N. 2001. Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology 31:177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirtley, J. E. 2010. Symposium cyberspace & the law: Privacy, property, and crime in the virtual frontier: Mask, shield, and sword: Should the journalist’s privilege protect the identity of anonymous posters to news media websites? Minnesota Law Review 94:1478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koker, L. 2006. Money laundering control and suppression of financing of terrorism: Some thoughts on the impact of customer due diligence measures on financial exclusion. Journal of Financial Crime 13 (1): 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larguier, J. 1965. Civil actions for damages in French criminal procedure. Tulane Law Review 1 (39): 687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lastoska, G., and D. Hunter. 2004. The laws of the virtual worlds. California Law Review 92 (1): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, A. V. M. 2007. Chasing dirty money: domestic and international measures against money laundering. Journal of Money Laundering Control 10 (2): 140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. 2002. Money laundering and its regulation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 582:181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M., and P. Reuter. 2006. Money laundering. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 34 (1): 289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucchi, N. 2011. Access to network services and protection of constitutional rights: Recognizing the essential role of internet access for the freedom of expression. Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 19 (3): 647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, R. B. 2010. A computer-generated catalog of types: By product data processing in museums. Curator: The Museum Journal 12 (2): 134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. 2009. The challenge of internet anonymity: protecting John Doe on the Internet. The John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law 26: 469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, M. 1999. ICAAN and internet governance: Sorting through the debris of self-regulation. Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for Telecommunications 1 (6): 497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, E. 2009. Manufacturing crime: process, pretext and criminal justice. Georgetown Law Journal 97: 1435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, P. M. 1997. Outlawing transnational bribery through the world trade organisation. Law and policy in International Business 28 (1): 305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nkhasi, S. S. 2007. Western unionizing the Hawala?: The Privatization of Hawalas and lender liability. North-western Journal of International Law and Business 27: 475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, J., and H. Shams. 2002. Money laundering law and terrorist financing: Post-September 11 responses—let us step back and take a deep breath. International Law Journal 13: 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ó Ciardhuáin, S. 2004. An extended model of cybercrime investigations. International Journal of Digital Evidence 3 (1): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkel, W. 2004. Money laundering and terrorism: Informal value transfer systems. American Criminal Law Review 41: 183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippsohn, S. 2001a. Money laundering on the internet. Computers & Security 20 (6): 485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippson, S. 2001b. The dangers of new technology—laundering on the internet. Journal of Money Laundering Control Thomason 1 (5): 89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieth, M., and G. Aiolfi. 2003. The private sector become active: The Wolfsberg process. Journal of Financial Crime 10 (4): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ping, H. 2004. New trends in money laundering—from the real world to cyberspace. Journal of Money Laundering Control 5 (1): 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presley, J. R. 1979. Marcel Labordere: A neglected French contribution to the trade cycle theory. Kyklos: International Review for Social Sciences 1 (32): 809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, M. K., and A. D. Rubin. 1998. Crowds: Anonymity for web transactions. Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC) 1 (1): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rider, B. A. K. 2002. The weapons of war: The use of anti-money laundering laws against terrorist and criminal enterprises—part 1. Journal of Banking Regulation 4 (1): 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J. 1997. Global capitalism and the State. International Affairs 73(3)pp. 427–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopper, M. D. 2002. Internet gambling, electronic cash & (and) money laundering: The unintended consequences of a monetary control scheme. Chapman Law Review 5 (1): 303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, J. C. 2008. Power and discourse in policy diffusion: Anti-Money laundering in developing states. International Studies Quarterly 52 (3): 635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, A. R. 1985. Forum non conveniens and the redundancy of court-access doctrine. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 133 (4): 429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strafer, G. R. 1989. Money laundering: The crime of the ‘90’s. American Criminal Law Review 27:149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straub, J. P. 2002. The prevention of e-money laundering: Tracking the elusive audit trail. Suffolk Transnational Law Review 25 (1): 515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomuschat, C. 2006. The legacy of Nuremberg. Journal of International Criminal Justice 4 (1): 830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twitchell, M. 1988. The myth of general jurisdiction. Harvard Law Review 101 (3): 610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, O. R., O. Folorunso, O. Akinwale, and A. D. Akinde. 2010. Transaction flow in card payment systems using mobile agents. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management 5:154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welling, S. N. 1989. Smurfs, money laundering and the federal criminal law: The crime of structuring transaction. Florida Law Review 41:287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yar, M. 2005. The novelty of cybercrime: An assessment in light of routine activity theory. European Journal of Criminology 2 (4): 407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasinsac, A. E., D. G. Marks, M. M. Pollitt, and P. M. Sommer. 2003. Computer forensics education. Security & Privacy Magazine 1 (4): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagaris, B. 2004. The merging of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financial enforcement regimes after September 11, 2001. Law and Policy in International Business 34:45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeldin, M. F., and C. V. Florio. 2007. Strengthening laws and financial institutions to combat emerging trends in money laundering. Journal of Money Laundering Control 2 (4): 412.

    Google Scholar 

Unpublished Works

  • Jamali, M. S. 2009. Cyberlaundering. A Master thesis submitted to the School of Computing Information Technology and Engineering, University of East London, in May 2009, in partial fulfillment of the requirement of Masters of Science in Information Security and Computer Forensics. <http://www.scribe.com/resources/cyberlaundering09811>. Accessed 2 June 2010.

  • Leslie, D. A. 2010. Anti-cyberlaundering regulation and control. A Masters thesis submitted to the Faculty of Law, University of the Westen Cape, in October 2010, in partial fulfilment of the requirement of Masters of Laws in Transnational Criminal Justice and Crime Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzoor, A. K. S. 2008. E-commerce technology and management. DBA 1727, III Semester Course Material, Masters for Business Administration Degree, Centre for Distance Education, Anna University, Chennai, India. <http://www.scribd.com/doc/40219342/160/Ethics-Social-and-Political-issue>. Accessed 2 Aug. 2013.

  • South African Law Reform Commission. 2012. The review of the law of evidence—draft discussion paper on the review of the law of evidence. Committee Paper 02/2012 Project 126, 29 September 2012.

    Google Scholar 

Internet Resources Internet Articles

Websites

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shearman & Sterling LLP, Paris, France

    Daniel Adeoyé Leslie

Authors
  1. Daniel Adeoyé Leslie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Adeoyé Leslie .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leslie, D. (2014). Conclusions and Recommendations. In: Legal Principles for Combatting Cyberlaundering. Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06416-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation