Skip to main content

Becoming Bioarchaeology? Traditions of Physical Anthropology and Archeology in Armenia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Archaeological Human Remains

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Archaeology ((BRIEFSARCHAE))

  • 1290 Accesses

Abstract

“Bioarchaeology” has recently made its way into publications and presentations on the physical anthropology and archeology of Armenia. Like other regions discussed in this book, bioarchaeology has been heralded as a new and important approach to analyze skeletal remains that moves away from typology toward historical reconstruction of human behavior. Yet, the questions asked, discussions, and presentation of skeletal analysis look quite different from Western—and particularly American—bioarchaeology. This chapter explores the history of the physical anthropology of skeletal materials from Armenia, tracing the major debates and interpretations from the late nineteenth century, through Soviet ethnogenesis, to recent trends that have shaped the discipline within Armenia today. In each major period of research, the ways that physical anthropologists have analyzed skeletal remains and interpreted past peoples have shifted. Thus, while the question of Armenian origins has remained a constant theme; the different approaches in each period of research have allowed for distinctly different claims about the relationship between populations in the past and the present. These ways of thinking about the past in relation for the present have implications for how bioarchaeology is and can be incorporated into the analysis of archeological human remains in Armenia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Dolicocephalic refers to cephalic index (the ratio of a head’s length to breadth described as a percentage) of <75 % or “long headed,” while brachycephalic refers to \( \geq \)80 % or “round headed” (see Reitzius 1846). Here, I have used the terms cephalic index and dolicocephalic for brevity, but it should be noted that dolichocephalic and brachy cephalic refer to the morphology of the heads of living subjects, while the terms dolichocranic and brachycranic are specific to the (skeletal) cranium.

  2. 2.

    Just a few years later in 1887–1889, Jacques Jean Marie de Morgan (1857–1824) was put in charge of overseeing a copper mine at Akhtala in Armenia and excavated 898 Iron Age burials that were nearby Lindsay and Smith ( 2006: 168), Morgan (1889: 82). Morgan’s 1889 publication focused on the material objects and in particular metallurgy, but he also included sketches of couple of crania and concluded that they were dolichocephalic.

  3. 3.

    Bayern also introduced the Brathonic term “cromlech” to describe the tombs in Armenia.

  4. 4.

    Jacques Jean Marie de Morgan (1857–1824) also made a connection to the Hittites; he compared two crania from his excavations of 898 Iron Age tombs near Alaverdi, Armenia with reliefs of Hittites and suggested that they shared common morphological features (Morgan 1889).

  5. 5.

    Alekseev and Mkrtchyan (1989) later pushed back the date of the crania from Dzhararat so that they were later than the Early Bronze Age.

  6. 6.

    Mkrtchyan recorded the sex and age for 143 individuals, long bone measurements for 55 individuals (40 male, 15 female), and cranium measurements for 37 individuals (20 male and 17 female).

  7. 7.

    In Russian гиперморфность. The translation and spelling here are from the translated summary (Mkrtchyan 2001: 58). The author may be referring to a hypermorphic morphology or extreme growth and specialization.

  8. 8.

    Mkrtchyan continued this socio-demographic analysis of Late Bronze and Iron I populations at Nerkin Getashen (2004) and Lchashen in the Sevan Basin.

  9. 9.

    For the newer collections we inventoried and recorded data according to the Standards (Buikstra and Ubelaker 1994) as well as Alekseev’s program, and also analyzed pathological conditions and evidence of trauma. At the History Museum of Armenia we recorded pathological conditions and evidence of trauma from the crania and human remains.

References

  • Abdushelishvili, Malkhaz Grigorevich. 1954. K Paleoantropologii Samtavrskogo Mogilnika. Tbilisi: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk Gruzinskoi SSR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdushelishvili, Malkhaz Grigorevich. 1968. Anthropology of the ancient and modern populations of the caucasus. In Contributions to the physical anthropology of central Asia and the caucasus, 355–60. Cambridge: Russian Translation Series, Mass: The Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdushelishvili, Malkhaz Grigorevich. 1979. Certain Problems of Ethnic Anthropology in Southwest Asia in the Light of the Latest Research. In Physiological and Morphological Adaptation and Evolution, ed. William A. Stini, 45–53. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alekseev, Valerii Pavlovich. 1966. Osteometriya. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alekseev, Valerii Pavlovich. 1968. K obosnovanniyu populyatsionnoi kontseptsii rasy. In Problemy Evolutsii Cheloveka I Ego Ras, ed. A.A. Zubov, G.L. Khit’, and V.P. Alekseev, 228–278. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alekseev, Valerii Pavlovich. 1993. Ocherki Ekologii Cheloveka. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alekseev, Valerii Pavlovich, and Georgiy Frantsevich Debets. 1964. Kraniometriya: Metodika antropologicheskikh issledovanii. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alekseev, Valerii Pavlovich, and Il’a Iosifovich Gokhman. 1984. Antropologiya Aziatskoi Chasti SSSR. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayern, Frédéric. 1882. Contribution a L’Archéologie du Caucase. Lyon: Imprimerie Pitrat Ainé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunak, Viktor V. 1927. Crania Armenica: Issledovanie po antropologii perednei azii. Moscow: MGU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunak, Viktor V. 1929. Arkheologicheskie raskopki v Novobayetskom Uesde SSR Armenii. Russkii Antropologicheskii Zhurnal. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunak, V. V. 1961. Race as a historical category. In Contemporary Raciology and Racism. International Journal of American Linguistics 27(3): 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzhilova, Aleksandra Petrovna. 1995. Drevnee Naselenie: Paleoantropologicheskie Aspekty Issledovaniya. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzhilova, Aleksandra Petrovna. 1998. Paleopatalogiya v bioarkheologicheskikh rekonstruktsiyakh: Istoricheskaya ekologiya cheloveka. Metodika biologicheskikh issledovaniy. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chantre, Ernest. 1882. Introduction Biographique. In Contribution a L’Archéologie du Caucase, by F. Bayern, v-xix. Lyon : Imprimerie Pitrat Ainé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chantre, Ernest. 1886. Anthropologiques dans le Caucase, 1879-1881 Mission Scientifique, v. II. Paris: Reinwald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chantre, Ernest. 1897. Les Armeniens, Esquisse Historique et Ethnographique. Bulletin de la Société d’Anthropologie de Lyon 15: 49–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childe, Vere Gordon. 1926. The Aryans: A Study of Indo-European Origins. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debets, Georgiy Frantsevich. 1948. Paleoantropologiya SSSR. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debets, Georgiy Frantsevich, Maksim Grigor’evich Levin, and Tatiana Alekseevna Trofimova. 1952. Antropologicheskiy Material kak istochnik izucheniya voprosov etnogeneza. Soviet Ethnography 1: 22–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrovol’skaya, Mariia Vsevolodovna. 2005. Chelovek i Ego Pishcha. Moscow: Nauka Mir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godina, Liudmila Borisovna, M.L. Butovskaya, and Aleksandr Grigor’evich Kozintsev. 1993. History of Biological Anthropology in Russia and the Former Soviet Union. International Association of Human Biologists, Occasional Papers 3: 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappers, Ariëns C.U. 1934. An Introduction to the Anthropology of the Near East (with a chapter on Near Eastern Blood Groups by Leland W. Parr). Amsterdam: N.V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevermaatschappij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kherumian, Ruben. 1943. Introduction a L’Anthropologie Du Caucase: Les Arméniens. Paris: Libraire Orientaliste Paul Geuthner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khudaverdyan, Anahit. 2005. Atlas Paleopatologicheskih Nakhodok Na Territorii Armenii. Yerevan: Van Aryan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khudaverdyan, Anahit. 2006. O Meste Beniaminskoi Serii Na Antropologicheskoi Karte Kavkaza i Sopredel’nikh Territorii v Epokhu Antichnosti. Hay Azgabanutyan yev Hnagitutyan Khndirner, 51–60. Yerevan: Gitutyun.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khudaverdyan, Anahit. 2008. Kranioskopicheskaya i odontologicheskaya kharakteristika naseleniya Armenii v epokhu bronzi. Hin Hayastani Mshakuyte XIV, 333–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khudaverdyan, Anahit. 2010. Palaeopathology of human remains from Vardbakh and the Black Fortress I, Armenia. Bioarchaeology of the Near East 4: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozintsev, A. G. 1988. Etnicheskaya Kranioskopiya: Rasovaya izmenhivost’ shvov cherepa sovremennogo cheloveka. Leningrad, Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalayan, Yervan. 1931. Dambanneri Peghumner Khorhrdayin Hayatanum. Yerevan: Hratarakut’yun Melk’onyan Fondi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, Ian, and Adam T. Smith. 2006. A History of Archaeological Practices in Armenia and the South Caucasus. Journal of Field Archaeology 31(2): 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Maureen E., and Ruzan Mkrtchyan. 2011. Armenia/Hayastan. In The Routledge Handbook of Archaeological Human Remains and Legislation: an international guide to laws and practice in the excavation, study, and treatment of archaeological human remains, ed. N. Marquez-Grant, and L. Fibiger, 18–32. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Rudolf. 1928. Lehrbuch de Anthropologie, 2-e Auflage. Jena: G. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mednikova, M. B. 2001. Trepanatsii u Drevnikh Narodov Evrazii. Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mkrtchyan, Ruzan A. 2001. Paleoantropolgiya Oromskogo Mogil’nika. Yerevan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mkrtchyan, Ruzan A., and Aleksandra P. Buzhilova. 2006. Kritika na knigy Khudaverdyan, A. Yu. “Atlas Paleopatologicheskih Nakhodok Na Territorii Armenii. Yerevan, Van Aryan”. Rossiiskaya Arkheologiya 4: 170–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mkrtchyan, Ruzan A, and Maureen E. Marshall. 2009. Hnamardabanakan nyuteri havakagrman yev fondavorman karevorutyune. In Tangarani K’ar’avarum: UNESCO/ICOM azgayin treyning (dasentats-varzhank) HH tarngaranneri masnaget’neri hamar, 11–14 Hunis 2009t, 82–85. Yerevan: Hayastan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Movsesian, Alla Armenovna. 2005. Feneticheskii analaiz v paleoantropolgii. Moscow: Universitetskaya kniga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Movsesian, Alla A., and N. Kochar. 2004. On the Origin of Armenians (In the light of non-metric traits data). Iran and the Caucasus 8: 184–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palikyan, A. 2008. Novii kraniologicjeskii material antichnoi epokhi s territorii shirakskoi ravini. Hin Hayastani Mshakuyte XIV 343-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, Ethan. 2006. Stalin and the Soviet science wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Retzius, Anders Adolf. 1846. Mémoire sur les formes du crâne de habitants du Nord. Annales des Sciences Naturelles (Section 3) 6: 133–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Shlapentokh, Dmitry. 2010. The fate of Nikolai Marr’s linguistic theories: The case of linguistics in the political context. Journal of Eurasian Studies 2(1): 60–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Shnirelman, Viktor. 1996. Who gets the past? Competition for ancestors among non-Russian intellectuals in Russia. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virchow, Rudolf Ludwig K. 1883. Das Gräberfeld von Koban im Lande der Osseten, Kaukasus. Berlin: A. Asher & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Luschan, Felix. 1911. The Early Inhabitants of Western Asia. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 41: 221–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yurchak, Alexi. 2003. Soviet Hegemony of Form: Everything Was Forever, until It Was No More. Comparative Studies in Society and History 45(3): 480–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am indebted to Ruzan Mkrtchyan for discussing with me Soviet Ethnogenesis and the history of physical anthropology in Armenia. Indeed, the basis for much of the historical information presented here can be found in our co-authored work (Marshall and Mkrtchyan 2011). However, the views, analysis, and interpretations expressed here are my own and I take responsibility for any mistakes. A more detailed analysis of the topics discussed here will be published in my dissertation. I would also like to thank Ruben Badalyan and Ashot Piliposyan for facilitating my osteological research in Armenia, as well as Adam T. Smith and Maria Lozada for encouraging my research into the intellectual history of physical anthropology of the South Caucasus.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maureen E. Marshall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marshall, M.E. (2014). Becoming Bioarchaeology? Traditions of Physical Anthropology and Archeology in Armenia. In: O’Donnabhain, B., Lozada, M. (eds) Archaeological Human Remains. SpringerBriefs in Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06370-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics