Skip to main content

Simulation Management Systems Developed by the Northern Gulf Coastal Hazards Collaboratory (NG-CHC): An Overview of Cyberinfrastructure to Support the Coastal Modeling Community in the Gulf of Mexico

Part of the Coastal Research Library book series (COASTALRL,volume 9)

Abstract

Given the significance of natural and built assets of the Gulf of Mexico region, the three states of Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi, leveraged their unique partnerships, proximity, and significant prior investments in cyberinfrastructure (CI) to develop the Northern Gulf Coastal Hazards Collaboratory (NG-CHC). This collaboratory was established to catalyze collaborative research via enhanced CI to reduce the regions vulnerability to natural and human disasters by facilitating high performance modeling to test hypotheses focused on engineering design, coastal system response, and risk management of coastal hazards. The objective of the NG-CHC is to advance research and inspire collaboration through highly available innovation-enabling CI, with a particular focus on geosciences and engineering from the watershed to the coast. An integrated CI capable of simulating all relevant interacting processes is needed to implement a system that captures the dynamic nature of coastal surface processes. The NG-CHC has implemented CI to locate appropriate data and computational resources, create necessary workflows associated with different simulation demands, and provide visualization tools for analysis of results. Three simulation management systems, SIMULOCEAN, SULIS, and ASGS, were implemented, each with a defined suite of hypotheses and institutional participants to run collaborator experiments. The NG-CHC focused on developing suites of CI tools centered on handling the functional needs of each simulation management system in a collaborative environment. The NG-CHC also developed curriculum units, computer games and simulations to extend the knowledge of coastal hazards to students from middle school to college. Education and outreach activities were developed to increase public understanding and support for sustainable coastal practices. The elements of the CI tool box within NG-CHC describe generic tools needed to promote a ‘collaborative modeling environment’ in other coastal systems.

Keywords

  • Storm Surge
  • Coastal Hazard
  • Curriculum Unit
  • Asymmetric Vortex
  • National Marine Fishery Service

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06326-3_15
  • Chapter length: 30 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-06326-3
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 15.1
Fig. 15.2
Fig. 15.3
Fig. 15.4
Fig. 15.5
Fig. 15.6
Fig. 15.7
Fig. 15.8
Fig. 15.9
Fig. 15.10
Fig. 15.11
Fig. 15.12

References

  • Adger WN, Hughes TP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Rockstrom J (2005) Social-economical resilience to coastal disasters. Science 309:1036–1039

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Alarcon V, McAnally W, DiazRamirez J, Martin J, Cartwright J (2009) A hydrological model of the mobile river watershed, southeastern USA. AIP Conf Proc 1148:64. doi:10.1063/1.3225392

    Google Scholar 

  • Caress DW, Chayes DN (1996) Improved processing of Hydrosweep DS multibeam data on the R/V Maurice Ewing. Mar Geophys Res 18:631–650. doi:10.1007/bf00313878

  • Chen Q, Wang L, Zhao H, Douglass SL (2007) Predictions of storm surges and wind waves on coastal highways in hurricane-prone areas. J Coast Res 23:1304–1317

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q, Wang L, Tawes R (2008) Hydrodynamic response of northeastern Gulf of Mexico to hurricanes. Estuar Coasts 31(6):1098–1116. doi:10.1007/s12237-008-9089-9

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Crossett KM (2004) Population trends along the coastal United States: 1980–2008/ Kristen M, Crossett T, Culliton P, Wiley T, Goodspeed (2004) NOAA. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service, Management and Budget Office, Special Project, Silver Spring

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowell M, Westcott J, Phelps S, Mahoney T, Coulton K, Bellomo D (2013) Estimating the United States population at risk from coastal flood-related hazards. In: Coastal hazards. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 151–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz AM, Krausmann E (2008) Damage to offshore oil and gas facilities following hurricanes Katrina and Rita: an overview. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2(6):620–626

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate E, Webb J (2008) A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob Environ Chang 18:598–606

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Day JW Jr, Boesch DF, Clairain EJ, Kemp GP, Laska SB, Mitsch WJ, Orth K, Mashriqui H, Reed DR, Shabman L, Simenstad CA, Streever BJ, Twilley RR, Watson CC, Wells JT, Whigham DF (2007) Restoration of the Mississippi delta: lessons from hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Science 315:1679–1684

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Day JW, Christian RR, Boesch DM, Yáñez-Arancibia A, Morris J, Twilley RR, Naylor L, Schaffner L, Stevenson C (2008) Consequences of climate change on the ecogeomorphology of coastal wetlands. Estuar Coasts 31:477–491

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich JC, Bunya S, Westerink JJ, Ebersole BA, Smith JM, Atkinson JH, Jensen R, Resio DT, Luettich RA, Dawson C, Cardone VJ, Cox AT, Powell MD, Westerink HJ, Roberts HJ (2010) A high-resolution coupled riverine flow, tide, wind, wind wave and storm surge model for southern Louisiana and Mississippi: part ii – synoptic description and analysis of hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Mon Weather Rev 138(2):378

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich JC, Trahan CJ, Howard MT, Fleming JG, Weaver RJ, Tanaka S, Yu L, Luettich RA Jr, Dawson CN, Westerink JJ, Wells G, Luf A, Vega K, Kubach A, Dresback RL, Kolar KM, Kaiser C, Twilley RR, (2012) Surface trajectories of oil transport along the Northern Coastline of the Gulf of Mexico. Cont Shelf Res. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2012.03.015

  • Fischetti M (2001) Drowning New Orleans. Sci Am, October, 77–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway G, Boesch D, Twilley RR (2009) Restoring and protecting coastal Louisiana. Issues Sci Technol Winter 2009:29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallegatte S, Green C, Nicholls RJ, Corfee MJ (2013) Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nat Clim Chang 3:802–806. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1979

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch RM, Moyer DL, Archfield SA (2010) Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season (WRTDS), with an application to Chesapeake Bay river inputs. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 46:857–880. doi:10.1111/j.17521688.2010.00482.x

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan SJ, Lewis MA, Harwell LM, Goodman LR (2010) Summer fish communities in northern Gulf estuaries: indices of ecological condition. Ecol Indic 10(2):504–515. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.09.003

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kim C, Park K (2012) A modeling study of water and salt exchange for a micro-tidal, stratified northern Gulf of Mexico estuary. J Mar Syst 96–97:103–115. doi:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2012.02.008

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Laska S, Woodell G, Hagelman R, Gramling R, Teets Farris M (2005) At risk: the human, community and infrastructure resources of coastal Louisiana. J Coast Res 44:90–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin N, Emanuel K, Oppenheimer M, Vanmarcke E (2012) Hurricane surge and global warming: a physically-based risk assessment. Nat Clim Chang 2:462

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks DP (2012) Water resource management modeling in 2050. Toward a sustainable water future visions for 2050. American Society of Civil Engineers

    Google Scholar 

  • Maestre A, Williamson D, Ward A (2012) Nutrient fluxes in rivers of the mobile – Alabama River system using WRTDS. 2012 Alabama water resources conference. Orange Beach, Alabama

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattocks C, Forbes C (2008) A real-time, event-triggered storm surge forecasting system for the state of North Carolina. Ocean Model 25:95–119

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Meselhe EA, Georgiou I, Allison MA, McCorquodale JA (2012) Numerical modeling of hydrodynamics and sediment transport in lower Mississippi at a proposed delta building diversion. J Hydrol 472–473:340–354

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2006) Drawing Louisiana’s new map: addressing land loss in Coastal Louisiana Committee on the restoration and protection of coastal Louisiana. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (2009) The GeoVision report, NSF Advisory Committee for Geosciences, 44 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson CR, Starfield AM, Kofinas GP, Kruse JA (2002) Ten heuristics for interdisciplinary modeling projects. Ecosystems 5(4):376–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls RJ, Woodroffe CD, Burkett V, Hay J, Wong PP, Nurse L (2011) 12.14 – Scenarios for coastal vulnerability assessment, reference module in earth systems and environmental sciences. In: Wolanski E, McLusky D (Editors-in-Chief) Treatise on estuarine and coastal science. Waltham, pp 289–303. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-374711-2.01217-1

  • Norris FH, Stevens SP, Pfefferbaum B, Wyche KF, Pfefferbaum RL (2008) Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Community Psychol 41:127–150

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Opperman JJ, Galloway GE, Fargione J, Mount JF, Richter BD, Secchi S (2009) Sustainable floodplains through large-scale reconnection to rivers. Science 326:1487–1488

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Paola C, Twilley RR, Edmonds DA, Kim W, Mohrig D, Parker G, Viparelli E, Voller VR (2011) Natural processes in delta restoration: application to the Mississippi Delta. Ann Rev Mar Sci 3(1):67–91

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pinter N (2005) One step forward, two steps back on U.S. floodplains. Science 308:207–208

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Scavia D (2002) Beyond science into policy: Gulf of Mexico hypoxia and the Mississippi River. Bio-Science 52:129–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrieb K, Norris F, Galea S (2010) Measuring capacities for community resilience. Soc Indic Res 99(2):227–247

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Syvitski J, Saito Y (2007) Morphodynamics of deltas under the influence of humans. Glob Planet Chang 57:261–282

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Twilley RR (2007) Comprehensive systems analysis and planning to secure water and coastal resources: lessons learned from hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Natl Wetl Newsl 29:33–35, Environmental Law Institute. Washington D.C., USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Twilley RR, Couvillion BR, Hossain I, Kaiser C, Owens AB, Steyer GD, Visser JM (2008) Coastal Louisiana ecosystem assessment and restoration (CLEAR) program: the role of ecosystem forecasting in evaluating restoration planning in the Mississippi River deltaic plain. In: McLaughlin KD (ed) Mitigating impacts of natural hazards on fishery ecosystems. American Fisheries Society, symposium 64, Bethesda, Maryland, pp 29–46

    Google Scholar 

  • USACE (2013) eCoastal enterprise GIS for coastal engineering and science, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. http://ecoastal.sam.usace.army.mil/. Accessed Dec 2013

  • Vörösmarty CJ, Syvitski J et al (2009) Battling to save the world’s river deltas. Bull At Sci 65(2):31

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wessel P, Smith WHF (1998) New, improved version of generic mapping tools released. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 79:579

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Westerink JJ Jr, Luettich RA, Feyen JC, Atkinson JH, Dawson C, Powell MD, Dunion JP, Roberts HJ, Kubatko EJ, Pourtaheri H (2008) A basin-to channel-scale unstructured grid hurricane storm surge model as implemented for southern Louisiana. Mon Weather Rev 136:833

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Chen Q (2008) Characteristics of extreme meteorological forcing and water levels in Mobile Bay, Alabama. Estuar Coasts 31(4):704–718. doi:10.1007/s12237-008-9062-7

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by NSF EPSCoR Program with cooperative agreements to the following institutions: EPS-1010640 to Louisiana Board of Regents; EPS-1010578 to Mississippi State University; and EPS-1010607 to The University of Alabama in Huntsville. We appreciate the leadership of Michael M. Khonsari (Louisiana Board of Regents), Sandra H. Harpole (Mississippi State University) and Sara J. Graves (The University of Alabama in Huntsville) for guidance through this collaborative research program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert R. Twilley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Twilley, R.R. et al. (2014). Simulation Management Systems Developed by the Northern Gulf Coastal Hazards Collaboratory (NG-CHC): An Overview of Cyberinfrastructure to Support the Coastal Modeling Community in the Gulf of Mexico. In: Finkl, C., Makowski, C. (eds) Remote Sensing and Modeling. Coastal Research Library, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06326-3_15

Download citation