Analytical Structure Characterization and Stability Analysis for a General Class of Mamdani Fuzzy Controllers

Part of the Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing book series (STUDFUZZ, volume 317)


Stability of a fuzzy control system is closely related to the analytical structure of the fuzzy controller, which is determined by its components such as input and output fuzzy sets and fuzzy rules. We first characterize the mathematical input–output structure of fuzzy controllers and then utilize the structure characteristics to advance stability analysis. We study how the components of a general class of Mamdani fuzzy controllers dictate the controller’s input–output relationship. The controllers can use input fuzzy sets of any types, arbitrary fuzzy rules, arbitrary inference methods, either Zadeh or the product fuzzy logic AND operator, singleton output fuzzy sets, and the centroid defuzzifier. We theoretically prove that regardless of the choices for the other components, if and only if Zadeh fuzzy AND operator and piecewise linear (e.g., trapezoidal or triangular) input fuzzy sets are used, the fuzzy controllers become a peculiar class of nonlinear controllers with the following interesting characteristics: (1) they are linear with respect to input variables; (2) their control gains dynamically change with the input variables; and (3) they become linear controllers with constant gains around the system equilibrium point. These properties make the fuzzy controllers suitable for analysis and design using conventional control theory. This necessary and sufficient condition becomes a sufficient condition if the product AND operator is employed instead. We name the fuzzy controllers of this peculiar class type-A fuzzy controllers. Taking advantage of this new structure knowledge, we have established a necessary and sufficient local stability condition for the type-A fuzzy control systems. It can be used not only for the stability determination, but also for practically designing a type-A fuzzy control system that is at least stable at the equilibrium point even when model of the controlled system is mathematically unknown. Three numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the utility of our new findings.


  1. 1.
    Du, X., Ying, H.: Derivation and analysis of the analytical structures of the interval type-2 fuzzy PI and PD controllers. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 8, 802–814 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Farinwata, S.S., Vachtsevanos, G.: Stability analysis of the fuzzy logic controller designed by the phase portrait assignment algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International conference Fuzzy Systems, San Francisco, pp. 1377–1382 (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Langari, R.: A nonlinear formulation of a class of fuzzy linguistic control algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 1992 American Control Conference, Chicago, IL (1992)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lewis, F.L., Liu, K.: Towards a paradigm for fuzzy logic control. Automatica 32, 167–181 (1996)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li, H.X., Gatland, H.B.: A new methodology for designing a fuzzy logic controller. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 25, 505–512 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Slotine, J.-J.E., Li, W.: Applied Nonlinear Control. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1991)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, L.X.: Adaptive Fuzzy Systems and Control. PTR Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, H.O., Tanaka, K., Griffin, M.F.: An approach to fuzzy control of nonlinear systems: stability and design issue. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 4, 14–23 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yager, R.R., Filev, D.P.: Essentials of Fuzzy Modeling and Control. Wiley, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ying, H.: The simplest fuzzy controllers using different inference methods are different nonlinear proportional-integral controllers with variable gains. Automatica 29, 1579–1589 (1993)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ying, H.: Practical design of nonlinear fuzzy controllers with stability analysis for regulating processes with unknown mathematical models. Automatica 30, 1185–1195 (1994)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ying, H.: Fuzzy Control and Modeling: Analytical Foundations and Applications. IEEE Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ying, H., Siler, W., Buckley, J.J.: Fuzzy control theory: a nonlinear case. Automatica 26, 513–520 (1990)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zeng, X.J., Singh, M.G.: Decomposition property of fuzzy systems and its applications. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 4, 167–181 (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhou, H., Ying, Hao: A method for deriving the analytical structure of a broad class of typical interval type-2 Mamdani fuzzy controllers. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 21, 447–458 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringWayne State UniversityDetroitUSA
  2. 2.Research and Advanced EngineeringFord Motor CompanyDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations