Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Efficient Leakage-Resilient Signature Schemes in the Generic Bilinear Group Model

  • Conference paper
Information Security Practice and Experience (ISPEC 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 8434))

Abstract

We extend the techniques of Kiltz et al. (in ASIACRYPT 2010) and Galindo et al. (in SAC 2012) to construct two efficient leakage-resilient signature schemes. Our schemes based on Boneh-Lynn-Shacham (BLS) short signature and Waters signature schemes, respectively. Both of them are more efficient than Galindo et al.’s scheme, and can tolerate leakage of (1 − o(1))/2 of the secret key at every signature invocation. The security of the proposed schemes are proved in the generic bilinear group model (in our first scheme which is based on the BLS signature, a random oracle is needed for the proof).

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 60970139), the Strategic Priority Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDA06010702), and the IIEs Cryptography Research Project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akavia, A., Goldwasser, S., Vaikuntanathan, V.: Simultaneous hardcore bits and cryptography against memory attacks. In: Reingold, O. (ed.) TCC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5444, pp. 474–495. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Alwen, J., Dodis, Y., Wichs, D.: Leakage-resilient public-key cryptography in the bounded-retrieval model. In: Halevi, S. (ed.) CRYPTO 2009. LNCS, vol. 5677, pp. 36–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Alwen, J., Dodis, Y., Naor, M., Segev, G., Walfish, S., Wichs, D.: Public-key encryption in the bounded-retrieval model. In: Gilbert, H. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6110, pp. 113–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Aggarwal, D., Maurer, U.: The leakage-resilience limit of a computational problem is equal to its unpredictability entropy. In: Lee, D.H., Wang, X. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 2011. LNCS, vol. 7073, pp. 686–701. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Biham, E., Carmeli, Y., Shamir, A.: Bug attacks. In: Wagner, D. (ed.) CRYPTO 2008. LNCS, vol. 5157, pp. 221–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyle, E., Segev, G., Wichs, D.: Fully leakage-resilient signatures. In: Paterson, K.G. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6632, pp. 89–108. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Boneh, D., Brumley, D.: Remote timing attacks are practical. Computer Networks 48(5), 701–716 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boneh, D., DeMillo, R.A., Lipton, R.J.: On the importance of checking cryptographic protocols for faults. In: Fumy, W. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1233, pp. 37–51. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Boneh, D., Boyen, X.: Efficient selective-ID secure identity-based encryption without random oracles. In: Cachin, C., Camenisch, J.L. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3027, pp. 223–238. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Boneh, D., Boyen, X., Goh, E.-J.: Hierarchical identity based encryption with constant size ciphertext. In: Cramer, R. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3494, pp. 440–456. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Boneh, D., Gentry, C., Lynn, B., Shacham, H.: Aggregate and verifiably encrypted signatures from bilinear maps. In: Biham, E. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2656, pp. 416–432. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Boneh, D., Lynn, B., Shacham, H.: Short signatures from the weil pairing. In: Boyd, C. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2248, pp. 514–532. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Boldyreva, A.: Threshold signatures, multisignatures and blind signatures based on the gap-diffie-hellman-group signature scheme. In: Desmedt, Y.G. (ed.) PKC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2567, pp. 31–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Chow, S.S.M., Dodis, Y., Rouselakis, Y., Waters, B.: Practical leakage-resilient identity-based encryption from simple assumptions. In: CCS 2010, pp. 152–161. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dodis, Y., Kalai, Y., Lovett, S.: On cryptography with auxiliary input. In: STOC 2009, pp. 621–630. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dodis, Y., Ostrovsky, R., Reyzin, L., Smith, A.: Fuzzy extractors: how tow generate strong keys from biometrics and other noisy data. SIAM J. Comput. 38(1), 97–139 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Dodis, Y., Haralambiev, K., Lopez-Alt, A., Wichs, D.: Cryptography against continuous memory attacks. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 511–520 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Faust, S., Kiltz, E., Pietrzak, K., Rothblum, G.N.: Leakage-resilient signatures. In: Micciancio, D. (ed.) TCC 2010. LNCS, vol. 5978, pp. 343–360. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Faust, S., Hazay, C., Nielsen, J.B., Nordholt, P.S., Zottarel, A.: Signature schemes secure against hard-to-invert leakage. In: Wang, X., Sako, K. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7658, pp. 98–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Galindo, D., Vivek, S.: A practical leakage-resilient signature scheme in the generic group model. In: Knudsen, L.R., Wu, H. (eds.) SAC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7707, pp. 50–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Katz, J., Vaikuntanathan, V.: Signature schemes with bounded leakage resilience. In: Matsui, M. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5912, pp. 703–720. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Kiltz, E., Pietrzak, K.: Leakage resilient elGamal encryption. In: Abe, M. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6477, pp. 595–612. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Kocher, P.C., Jaffe, J., Jun, B.: Differential power analysis. In: Wiener, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 1999. LNCS, vol. 1666, pp. 388–397. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Micali, S., Reyzin, L.: Physically observable cryptography. In: Naor, M. (ed.) TCC 2004. LNCS, vol. 2951, pp. 278–296. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Shoup, V.: Lower bounds for discrete logarithms and related problems. In: Fumy, W. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1233, pp. 256–266. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwartz, J.T.: Fast probabilistic algorithms for verfication of polynomial identities. J. ACM 27(4), 701–717 (1980)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Tang, F., Li, H., Niu, Q., Liang, B.: Efficient leakage-resilient signature schemes in the generic bilinear group model. In: Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2013/785 (2013) http://eprint.iacr.org/

  28. Waters, B.: Efficient identity-based encryption without random oracles. In: Cramer, R. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3494, pp. 114–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Zippel, R.: Probabilistic algorithms for sparse polynomials. In: Ng, K.W. (ed.) EUROSAM 1979 and ISSAC 1979. LNCS, vol. 72, pp. 216–226. Springer, Heidelberg (1979)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Data Assurance and Communication Security Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Fei Tang, Hongda Li, Qihua Niu & Bei Liang

  2. State Key Laboratory of Information Security, Institute of Information Engineering of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Fei Tang, Hongda Li, Qihua Niu & Bei Liang

Authors
  1. Fei Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hongda Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qihua Niu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bei Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Fujian Normal University, No. 32 Shangsan Road, 350007, Fuzhou, China

    Xinyi Huang

  2. Infocom Security Department, Institute for Infocomm Research, 1 Fusionopolis Way, #21-01 Connexis, South Tower, 138632, Singapore, Singapore

    Jianying Zhou

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tang, F., Li, H., Niu, Q., Liang, B. (2014). Efficient Leakage-Resilient Signature Schemes in the Generic Bilinear Group Model. In: Huang, X., Zhou, J. (eds) Information Security Practice and Experience. ISPEC 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8434. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06320-1_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06320-1_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06319-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06320-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation