On Proving Recoverability of Smart Electrical Grids
Smart electrical grids refer to networked systems for distributing and transporting electricity from producers to consumers, by dynamically configuring the network through remotely controlled (dis)connectors. The consumers of the grid have typically distinct priorities, e.g., a hospital and an airport have the highest priority and the street lighting has a lower priority. This means that when electricity supply is compromised, e.g., during a storm, then the highest priority consumers should either not be affected or should be the first for whom electricity provision is recovered. In this paper, we propose a general formal model to study the provability of such a property. We have chosen Event-B as our formal framework due to its abstraction and refinement capabilities that support correct-by-construction stepwise development of models; also, Event-B is tool supported. Being able to prove various properties for such critical systems is fundamental nowadays, as our society is increasingly powered by dynamic digital solutions to traditional problems.
KeywordsSmart Grid Link Failure Recovery Mechanism Dynamic Part Proof Obligation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Abrial, J.R.: The B-Book: Assigning Programs to Meanings. Cambridge University Press (1996)Google Scholar
- 2.Abrial, J.R.: Modeling in Event-B: System and Software Engineering. Cambridge University Press (2010)Google Scholar
- 3.Back, R., Sere, K.: From Modular Systems to Action Systems. Software - Concepts and Tools 13, 26–39 (1996)Google Scholar
- 7.Clark, A., Pavlovski, C.: Wireless Networks for the Smart Energy Grid: Application Aware Networks. In: Proceedings of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, vol. 2 (2010)Google Scholar
- 8.Craigen, D., Gerhart, S., Ralson, T.: Case Study: Paris Metro Signaling System. In: Proceedings of IEEE Software, pp. 32–35. IEEE (1994)Google Scholar
- 9.Event-B and the Rodin Platform, http://www.event-b.org/ (accessed January 2014)
- 14.He, M., Zhang, J.: Fault detection and localization in smart grid: A probabilistic dependence graph approach. In: IEEE SmartGridComm 2010, pp. 43–48 (2010)Google Scholar
- 15.Horsmanheimo, S., Maskey, N., Kokkoniemi-Tarkkanen, H., Savolainen, P., Tuomimäki, L.: Evaluation of Interdependencies between Mobile Communication and Electricity Distribution Networks in Fault Scenarios. In: IEEE ISGT Asia 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
- 16.Horsmanheimo, S., Kamali, M., Kolehmainen, M., Neovius, M., Petre, L., Rönkkö, M., Sandvik, P.: On Proving Recoverability of Smart Electrical Grids. Tech. Rep. 1096, TUCS – Turku Centre for Computer Science (2013)Google Scholar
- 19.LaCommare, K., Eto, J.: Cost of power interruptions to electricity consumers in the United States. Tech. rep., Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, lBNL-58164 (2006)Google Scholar
- 20.Luan, W., Sharp, D., Lancashire, S.: Smart grid communication network capacity planning for power utilities. In: Proceedings of Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
- 23.Tate, J., Overbye, T.: Double line outage detection using phasor angle measurements. In: Power & Energy Society General Meeting, PES 2009, pp. 1–5. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar