Advertisement

Smart City pp 13-43 | Cite as

Smart and Digital City: A Systematic Literature Review

  • Annalisa Cocchia
Part of the Progress in IS book series (PROIS)

Abstract

The concept of Smart City embraces several definitions depending on the meanings of the word “smart”: intelligent city , knowledge city , ubiquitous city , sustainable city , digital city , etc. Many definitions of Smart City exist, but no one has been universally acknowledged yet. From literature analysis it emerges that Smart City and Digital City are the most used terminologies in literature to indicate the smartness of a city. This Chapter explores the literature about Smart City and Digital City from 1993 to the end of 2012 in order to investigate how these two concepts were born, how they have developed, which are the shared features and differences between them. To accomplish with these goals, three steps were followed: (1) to set up a search strategy for systematic literature review to collect a representative subset of papers about Smart City and Digital City using Google Scholar; (2) to store the selected subset in an ad-doc database to synthesize the literature review; (3) to organize the literature review subset to extract quantitative and qualitative data and information about Smart City and Digital City evolution. The author proposes a literature review taxonomy through five specific analysis: (1) time analysis, to explore the causes of the trend of Smart City and Digital City literature in the latest twenty years; (2) terminology analysis, to examine how and where these two ideas were born and what have been the main events influenced their development; (3) definitions analysis, to select and compare the most cited and validated definitions of Smart City and Digital City trying to identify similarities, differences or overlaps between these two concepts; (4) typology analysis, to investigate if Smart City and Digital City are included into a specific urban strategy pursued by government or if they face specific urban problems without a comprehensive framework; (5) geographic analysis, to understand where are the largest concentrations of Smart Cities and Digital Cities in the world and which are their main characteristics and best practices.

Keywords

Smart city Digital city Literature review ICT Urban strategies 

References

  1. 1.
    Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65–82. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pardo, T., & Taewoo, N. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 282–291). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? City: Analysis of Urban Trend, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 12(3), 303–320.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Plattfaut, R., & Cleven, A. (2009). Reconstructing the giant: on the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. ECIS 17th European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 2–13).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cooper, H. M. (1988). Organizing knowledge syntheses: a taxonomy of literature review. Knowledge Society, 1, 104–126.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    IBM (2010). Smarter thinking for a smarter planet.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dameri, R. P. (2013). Searching for smart city definition: a comprehensive proposal. International Journal of Computers & Technology, 11(5), 2544–2551(Council for Innovative Research).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Su, K., Li, J., & Fu, H. (2011). Smart city and the applications. IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Control (ICECC), pp. 1028–1031(IEEE Xplore).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pardo, T. A., & Nam, T. (2011). Smart city as urban innovation: focusing on management, policy and context. Proceeding of the 5th International Conference on theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 185–194). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T. A., & Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: an integrative framework. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 2289–2297). IEEE Xplore.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schuler, D. (2002). Digital cities and digital citizens. In: M. Tanabe, P. van den Besselaar, T. Ishida (Eds.), Digital cities II: computational and sociological approaches. LNCS, vol. 2362, (pp. 71–85). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schuurman, D., Baccarne, B., De Marez, L., & Mechant, P. (2012). Smart ideas for smart cities: investigating crowdsourcing for generating and selecting ideas for ICT innovation in a city context. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(3), 49–62. (Universidad de Talca, Chile).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schiewe, J., Krek, A., Peters, I., Sternberg, H., & Traub, K. P. (2008) HCU research group “Digital City”: developing and evaluating tools for urban research. In: Ehlers et al. (Eds.) Digital earth summit on geoinformatics.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moutinho, J. L. (2008). Building the information society in Portugal: lessons from the digital cities programm 1998–2000. In van Geenhuizen (Eds.), Value-added partnering and innovation in a changing world.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ricciardi, F. (2010). ICTs in an ageing society: an overview of emerging research streams. In A. D’Atri, M. De Marco, A. M. Braccini, F. Cabiddu (Eds.), Management of the interconnected world. ITAIS, vol. 1, (pp. 37–44). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cosgrove, S. (2009). The United Nations framework convention on climate change. 15th Conference of the Parties—The Copenhagen Protocol. Background Paper, AMUNC.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ishida, T. (2000). Understanding digital cities. In: T. Ishida, K. Isbister (Eds.), Digital cities. LNCS, vol. 1765, (pp. 7–17). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schaffers, H., Ratti, C., & Komninos N. (2012). Special issue on smart applications for smart cities—new approaches to innovation: guest editors’ introduction. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(3). (Universidad de Talca, Chile).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ishida, T., & Hiramotsu K. (2001). An augmented web space for digital cities. Proceedings of Symposium on Applications and the Internet (pp. 105–112).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sorrentino, M., & Simonetta, M. (2013). Incentivising inter-municipal collaboration: the Lombard experience. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(4), 887–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dameri, R. P. (2012). Defining an evaluation framework for digital cities implementation. IEEE International Conference on Information Society (i-Society), (pp. 466-470). IEEE Xplore.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Europe 2020 Strategy. from ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/what/europe2020/index_en.cfm.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    ABB Report (2012). Smart cities in Italia: un’opportunità nello spirito del Rinascimento per una nuova qualità della vita. Technical Report, ABB.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Al-Hader, M., & Rodzi A. (2009). The smart city infrastructure development and monitoring. Theoretical and Empirical Researchers in Urban Management, 2(11).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    van Bastelaer, B., & Lobet-Maris C. (1998). Social learning regarding multimedia developments at a local level. The case of digital cities. In B. van Bastelaer, C. Lobet-Maris (Eds.), SLIM research—DG XII—TSER program. Final integrated study—Social learning in the public sector, University of Namur.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dieberger, A., & Frank, A. U. (1998). A city metaphor to support navigation in complex information spaces. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 9(6), 597–622. (Elsevier).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic, N., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities. Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna: University of Technology.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wacker, J. G. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16, 361–385. (Elsevier).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research. Design and methods. California: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Casalino, N., Buonocuore, F., Rossignoli, C., & Ricciardi F. (2013). Transparency, openness and knowledge sharing for rebuilding and strengthening government institutions. IASTED Multiconferences—Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Web-Based Education, (pp. 866–871). WBE.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Anthopoulos, L., & Tougountzoglou T. E. (2012). A viability model for digital cities: economic and acceptability factors. In: C. Reddick, S. Aikins (Eds.), Web 2.0 technologies and democratic governance. PAIT, vol. 1, (pp. 79–96). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ericcson Report (2012). Networked society city index—Part III: triple bottom line benefits for city business. Technical report, Ericsson.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Partridge, H., Hall, H., McAllister, L., & Hallam G. (2005). Effecting social change in the “Smart City”: the west end connect community project. Conference on the Social Change in the 21st Century. Centre for Social Change Research, Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Anci Cittalia (2011). Smart Cities nel Mondo. Technical report, Fondazione Anci Ricerche.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Odendaal, N. (2007). Towards the digital city in South Africa: issues and constraints. Journal of Urban Technology, 13(3), 29–48. (Routledge).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hall, P. (2000). Creative cities and economic development. Urban Studies, 37(4), 633–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    OECD (2011). M-Government. Mobile technologies for responsive government and connected societies. Technical report, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    ZArdini, A., Mola, L., Vom Brocke, J., & Rossignoli, C. (2010). The role of ECM and its contribution in decision-making processes. Journal of Decision Systems, 19(4), 389–406.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Anthopoulos, L., & Fitsilis, P. (2010). From digital to ubiquitous cities: defining a common architecture for urban development. IEEE 6th International conference on Intelligent Environments, (pp. 301–306). IEEE Xplore.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Komninos, N. (2006). The architecture of intelligent cities: integrating human, collective and artificial intelligence to enhance knowledge and innovation. IEEE 2nd IET International Conference on Intelligent Environments (pp. 13–20). IEEE Xplore.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Couclelis, H. (2004). The construction of the digital city. Planning and Design, 31(1), 5–19 (Environment and Planning).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    California Institute (2001), http://smartcommunities.org/concept.php.
  43. 43.
    Ergazakis, M., Metaxiotis, M., & Psarras, J. (2004). Towards knowledge cities: conceptual analysis and success stories. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(5), 5–15 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    OECD Observed (1999). Learning cities: the new recipe in regional development.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Batagan, L. (2011). Smart cities and sustainability models. Revista de Informatica Economica, 15(3), 80–87.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    OECD: Green Cities Programme (2010). http://www.oecd.org/gov/regional-policy/49318965.pdf.
  47. 47.
    Northstream (2010). White paper on revenue opportunities, from http://northstream.se/white-paper/archive.
  48. 48.
    Setis-Eu (2012). setis.ec.europa.eu/implementation/technology-roadmap/European-initiative-on-smart-cities.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Qi, L., & Shaofu, L. (2001). Research on digital city framework architecture. IEEE International Conferences on Info-Tech and Info-Net, vol. 1, (pp. 30–36). Proceedings ICII.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Komninos, N. (2008). Intelligent cities and globalization of innovation networks. Lomdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Yovanof, G. S., & Hazapis G. N. (2009). An architectural framework and enabling wireless technologies for digital cities and intelligent urban environments. Wireless Personal Communications, 49(3), 445–463. (Springer).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Dykes, J. (2010). GeoVisualization and the digital city. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34, 443–451. (Elsevier).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of GenoaGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations