Abstract
In a shallow karst aquifer in SW Slovenia assessment of groundwater and drinking water source vulnerability has been performed using different methods. The small, but well defined, Orehek karst is mainly drained by the no longer exploited Korentan spring. The recharge area of the spring is well karstified, densely wooded, and covered by thin soils. Besides precipitation, the spring is additionally recharged by temporally active sinking streams. To assess the vulnerability, two methods, COP+K and Slovene approach, have been applied. Both methods provide tools for assessing vulnerability in carbonate rocks. They both rank among very sophisticated methods that require vast amounts of data, time, and financial and technical resources. Both methods share the same methodological procedure and consider the same type of information, categorized by the same factors. On the other hand, the scoring, classification and weighting of individual parameters between the methods are different. Consequently, the resulting maps differ significantly. Major differences between the results are identified and discussed. In addition, sensitivity analysis of individual factors have been performed and compared to cross-correlation, autocorrelation and water budget calculations. The results show high dependence of the COP+K method to the parameters characterizing the infiltration conditions (the so-called C factor) and distance to water source. The Slovene approach vulnerability classes are mainly influenced by thickness of the soil cover, presence of morphological features and the temporal hydrological variability that is justified by the performed statistical analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Andreo B, Ravbar N, Vías JM (2009) Source vulnerability mapping in carbonate (karst) aquifers by extension of the COP method: application to pilot sites. Hydrogeol J 17(3):749–758
Daly D, Dassargues A, Drew D, Dunne S, Goldscheider N, Neale N, Popescu C, Zwahlen F (2002) Main concepts of the European approach for (karst) groundwater vulnerability assessment and mapping. Hydrogeol J 10(2):340–345
Dörfliger N, Zwahlen F (1998) Practical guide: groundwater vulnerability mapping in karstic regions (EPIK). Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape, Bern
Ford DC, Williams PW (2007) Karst hydrogeology and geomorphology. Wiley, London
Gogu RC, Dassargues A (2000) Sensitivity analysis for the EPIK method of vulnerability assessment in a small karstic aquifer, southern Belgium. Hydrogeol J 8:337–345
Goldscheider N (2010) Delineation of spring protection zones. In: Kresic N, Stevanovic Z (eds) Groundwater hydrology of springs. Engineering, theory, management, and sustainability. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
Gospodarič R, Habe F, Habic P (1970) Orehovški kras in izvir Korentana (the karst of Orehek and the source of the Korentan). Acta Carsologica 5:95–108
GPS: Groundwater Protection Schemes (1999) Dublin, Department of the Environment and Local Government, Environmental Protection Agency and Geological Survey of Ireland
Jemcov I, Petrič M (2009) Measured precipitation vs. Effective infiltration and their influence on the assessment of karst system based on results of the time series analysis. J Hydrol 379:304–314
Kovačič G (2010) Hydrogeological study of the Malenščica karst spring (SW Slovenia) by means of a time series analysis. Acta Carsologica 39(2):201–215
Kovačič G, Petrič M (2007) Karst aquifer intrinsic vulnerability mapping in the Orehek area (SW Slovenia) using the EPIK method. In: Witkowski AJ (ed) Groundwater vulnerability assessment and mapping: selected papers from the groundwater vulnerability assessment and mapping international conference, Ustroń, Poland, 2004. Taylor and Francis, London
Marín AI, Dörfliger N, Andreo B (2012) Comparative application of two methods (COP and PaPRIKa) for groundwater vulnerability mapping in Mediterranean karst aquifers (France and Spain). Environ Earth Sci 65(8):2407–2421
Neukum C, Hötzl H (2007) Standardization of vulnerability maps. Environ Geol 51:689–694
Petrič M, Šebela S (2004) Vulnerability mapping in the recharge area of the Korentan spring, Slovenia. Acta Carsologica 33(2):151–168
Pételet-Giraud E, Dörfliger N, Crochet P (2000) RISKE: Méthode d’évaluation multicritère de la vulnérabilité des aquifères karstiques. Application aux systèmes des Fontanilles et Cent-Fonts (Hérault, Sud de la France). Hydrogéologie 4:71–88
Slovene Cadastre of Caves (2010) Karst Research Institute at ZRC SAZU
Schulte U (1994) Geologische und Hydrogeologische Untersuchungen im Karst von Orehek (Slowenien). Diplomarbeit, Universität Karlsruhe, Deutschland
Ravbar N (2007) The protection of karst waters—a comprehensive Slovene approach to vulnerability and contamination risk mapping. ZRC Publishing, Karst Research Institute at ZRC SAZU 6: Carsologica, Postojna, Ljubljana
Ravbar N, Goldscheider N (2007) Proposed methodology of vulnerability and contamination risk mapping for the protection of karst aquifers in Slovenia. Acta Carsologica 36(3):461–475
Ravbar N, Goldscheider N (2009) Comparative application of four methods of groundwater vulnerability mapping in a Slovene karst catchment. Hydrogeol J 17:725–733
Vías JM, Perles MJ, Andreo B, Carrasco F (2005) A comparative study of four schemes for groundwater vulnerability mapping in a diffuse flow carbonate aquifer under Mediterranean climatic conditions. Environ Geol 47:586–595
Vías JM, Andreo B, Perles MJ, Carrasco F, Vadillo I (2006) Proposed method for groundwater vulnerability mapping in carbonate (karstic) aquifers: the COP method: application in two pilot sites in southern Spain. Hydrogeol J 14(6):912–925
Vías JM, Andreo B, Ravbar N, Hötzl H (2010) Mapping the vulnerability of groundwater to the contamination of four carbonate aquifers in Europe. J Environ Manage 91(7):1500–1510
Vrba J, Zaporozec A (1994) Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. IAH, International Contributions to Hydrogeology, 16, Heise, Hannover
Zwahlen F (ed) (2004) Vulnerability and risk mapping for the protection of carbonate (karst) aquifers. Final report of COST Action 620. European Commission, Directorate-General XII Science, Research and Development, Brussels
Acknowledgments
This manuscript is a contribution to projects CGL2008-06158 BTE of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Higher Education and IGCP 598 of UNESCO, and to Research Group RNM-308 funded by the Regional Government of Andalusia (Spain).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marín, A.I., Ravbar, N., Kovačič, G., Andreo, B., Petrič, M. (2014). Application of Methods for Resource and Source Vulnerability Mapping in the Orehek Karst Aquifer, SW Slovenia. In: Mudry, J., Zwahlen, F., Bertrand, C., LaMoreaux, J. (eds) H2Karst Research in Limestone Hydrogeology. Environmental Earth Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06139-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06139-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06138-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06139-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)