Skip to main content

The Advantages and Pitfalls of Leveraging Humanitarian Development and Diplomacy Toward National Security

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Leveraging
  • 551 Accesses

Abstract

Since the mid-2000s, United States foreign and security policy locates development and diplomacy as integral parts of a whole. As such they co-located with defense into a tripartite structure (collectively known as the 3D security strategy), each segment of which is meant to work in conjunction with the others to achieve the overall goal of greater stability worldwide, and a strengthened position for the USA within that stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Post-2002 United States National Security Strategies, and the Quadrennial Defense and Development Review have used this term—and in later iterations, integrated to a degree such that the actual term “3D” is rarely now used.

  2. 2.

    The existence of terms like “gunboat diplomacy” is telling here. This is one of several terms used widely both in whole and in suggestion, that interpret the threat of force should negotiations not go favorably as part of diplomacy—most humorously stated by Will Rogers, who defined diplomacy as “the art of saying ‘nice doggie’ until you can find a rock.”

  3. 3.

    Joseph S. Nye, Jr. Foreign Policy No. 80, Twentieth Anniversary (Autumn 1990), pp. 153–171.

  4. 4.

    Anderson’s taxonomy of leverage has these main parts: bargaining, resource, and investment leverage; constructive and destructive leverage; the leverage mean.

  5. 5.

    http://www.saferworld.org.uk/downloads/pubdocs/Community-based-approaches-to-safety-and-security.pdf

  6. 6.

    Von Clausewitz’s assertion that warfare is an extension of politics by other means should be read in context as an indication that military usage is driven by civilian politics, not the other way around.

  7. 7.

    http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/10/22/the_price_of_war_hrw_us_drone_strikes_yemen#sthash.6uJhwX1K.dpbs as one of many examples.

  8. 8.

    This position was taken in an article published by National Public Radio, “Which Nations Hate The U.S.? Often Those Receiving U.S. Aid,” by Greg Myre, July 23, 2013.

  9. 9.

    Found within the Mid-Term Evaluation of USAID’s Counter-Extremism Programming in Africa, http://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=691725

  10. 10.

    William Easterly, White Man’s Burden.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Alpher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alpher, D. (2014). The Advantages and Pitfalls of Leveraging Humanitarian Development and Diplomacy Toward National Security. In: Anderson, D. (eds) Leveraging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06094-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics