Skip to main content

Leveraging in Modern and Contemporary Families

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Leveraging
  • 562 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, I address the role of leveraging in the contemporary American family system (1970s to present). Leveraging is a basic principle of human behavior and thus has always been present in family life, in the United States, and in every country. Yet we are currently living during a time period that has witnessed the rise of leveraging in the American family system in the same way we have witnessed the rise of leveraging in all aspects of American society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For discussions about the diversity of family types (nuclear family, blended families, extended families, single-parent families, gay and lesbian families) in the United States and the United Kingdom see, Rapoport et al. (1977) and Taylor (1997). See Arendell (1997a, b) for a discussion of parenting issues that arise in African-American, Hispanic, Asian American, and Native American families, along with a set of other socio-economic and ethnic characteristics. On the topic of Race, Ethnicity, and Culture see the website for the Council of Contemporary Families: http://www.contemporaryfamilies.org/topics/race-ethnicity-culture/. This leading organization contains extensive resources on all aspects of families, including work and family issues.

  2. 2.

    A leading mainstream sociological account of the emergence of the modern family is Shorter (1975). Also see Degler (1983). A feminist sociologist who also sees the modern nuclear family as a product of industrial capitalism is Cancian (1987). A Marxist who takes a broadly similar view is Zaretsky (1976). For a critical discussion of these accounts of the rise of the modern family, see MacFarlane (1987). MacFarlane draws on a number of critics of the received view, who maintain that romantic love between partners in a marriage and the nuclear family model were widespread in certain periods prior to the rise of industrial capitalism.

  3. 3.

    See, for example, Rubin (1983). The highly influential “ethics of care” developed by Gilligan (1982) represented a feminine counterpart to the male voice of the “ethics of justice” associated with the moral psychology of Lawrence Kohlberg, which focuses on norms about autonomy, rights, and impartiality. Also see Osherson (1986), which focuses on understanding fathers.

  4. 4.

    Psychodynamic therapists, especially working in the object relations tradition, frequently employ theories of projection, projective identification, and triangulation to explain how parents project their problems onto the child. See, e.g., Dicks (1967), Bowen (1978), Scharff and Scharff (1987), and Luepnitz (2002). Also see Scarf (1987).

  5. 5.

    An example of cognitive therapy is Beck (1989). We have already employed concepts from a psychoanalytic point of view, one that draws on object relations rather than drive reduction psychoanalytic theory and which has been shaped by feminist moral concepts, namely Luepnitz (2002). Luepnitz actually critiques eight different theories of family therapy along with developing her own version of feminist object relations family therapy. She indicates that her work is heavily influenced by Chodorow (1999).

  6. 6.

    McDowell, “The Struggle in the Family Life,” Charities (December 3, 1904), pp. 196–197 as quoted in Stanley Feldstein and Lawrence Costello, eds., The Ordeal of Assimilation (New York: Anchor Books, 1974), p. 361: Taken from: Elizabeth H. Pleck, “Challenges to Traditional Authority in Immigrant Families,” in Gordon (1983), p. 513.

  7. 7.

    I am a Commissioner on the Montgomery County (Maryland) Commission on Children and Youth. I sit on the Social Media Literacy Committee, which has been studying Social Media Literacy since September, 2013. The Superintendent of the Montgomery County School System, Dr. Joshua Starr, is a strong proponent of Social and Emotional Learning. He has held one of his monthly book club meetings on Paul Tough’s book, How Children Succeed on January 9, 2013: http://rockville.patch.com/groups/schools/p/superintendent-starr-to-host-school-year-s-first-book-club In response to some student online misconduct in the fall of 2013, Dr. Starr is in the process of creating a Cybercivility Task Force.

References

  • Ariès P (1960) Centuries of childhood: a social history of family life, translated by Robert Baldiok. Vintage Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendell T (ed) (1997a) Contemporary parenting: challenges and issues. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendell T (1997b) A social constructionist approach to parenting. In: Arendell T (ed) Contemporary parenting: challenges and issues. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 1–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck Aaron (1989) Love is never enough. Harper Perennial, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell D (1996) The cultural contradictions of capitalism with a new afterword by the author. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordo Susan (1987) The flight to objectivity: essays on cartesianism. SUNY Series in Philosophy, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen Murray (1978) Family therapy in clinical practice. Jason Aronson, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancian Francesca (1987) Love in America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow N (1999) The reproduction of mothering: psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. University of California Press, Los Angeles (First edition with new preface by the Author)

    Google Scholar 

  • Degler CN (1983) The emergence of the modern family. In: Gordon (1983), pp 61–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Demos J (1999) A little commonwealth: family life in plymouth colony, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicks H (1967) Marital tensions. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedan Betty (1963) The feminine mystique. Dell Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan C (1982) In a different voice: psychological theory and women's development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon Michael (1983) The American family in social-historical perspective, 3rd edn. St. Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch C (1977) Haven in a heartless world: the family besieged. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Luepnitz DA (2002) With a new introduction by the author. The family interpreted: feminism, psychoanalysis, and family therapy. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane A (1987) Capitalism and love. The culture of capitalism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell ME (1904) The struggle in the family life. Charities (December 3), pp 196–197 as quoted in Feldstein S, Costello L (eds) The ordeal of assimilation. Anchor Books, New York, p 361, 1974: Taken from: Elizabeth H. Pleck, “Challenges to traditional authority in immigrant families,” in Gordon (1983), pp 504–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Osherson S. (1986) Finding our fathers. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport R, Rapoport RN, Strelitz Z, Kew S (1977) New Directions in parenting. In: Fathers, mothers & society: perspectives on parenting. Vintage Books, New York, pp 348–365 (Chapter 9)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin L (1983) Intimate strangers: men and women together. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarf Maggie (1987) Intimate partners. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharff David, Scharff Jill (1987) Object relations family therapy. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorter Edward (1975) The making of the modern family. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RL (1997) Whose parenting: trends and patterns. In: Arendell T (eds) Contemporary parenting: challenges and issues. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 68–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Tough Paul (2012) How children succeed: grit, curiosity, and the hidden power of character. Houghlin Mifflin Harcourt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (2009) The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Translated and introduced by Stephen Kalhberg. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaretsky Eli (1976) Capitalism, the family, and personal life. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Anderson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, D.M. (2014). Leveraging in Modern and Contemporary Families. In: Anderson, D. (eds) Leveraging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06094-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics