Abstract
This chapter describes experiences in a small farm in the Colombian foothills, in which the aim was to demonstrate – and at the same time to research – the major components of the strategy that should underpin all future farming systems: namely the need to “decarbonize” the system, by reducing emissions of greenhouse gases, generating electricity locally from natural resources, making maximum use of solar energy and ensuring there is no conflict between use of available resources for both food and fuel production. The inevitable decline in the production of oil (peak oil), which will have negative effects on all features of contemporary lifestyles, is viewed from the positive standpoint of the opportunities that will be created for more sustainable farming systems when solar energy, via the production of biomass, will be the basis of the required needs for food, feed and fuel energy.
It is argued that in such a scenario, small scale integrated family farms, will have comparative advantages – economic, social and environmental – in a world in the decline phase of the oil age and increasing dependence on solar energy. Transport is the major end user of fossil fuel, thus as the supply of this resource diminishes and the price increases, there will be advantages in decentralization and localization of both production and processing of the immediate products of photosynthesis which are of low bulk density and therefore expensive to transport. An analysis of the alternative technologies for production of fuel energy from biomass, as a component of a farming system, leads to the conclusion that gasification is the most appropriate route. The advantages of this process are that: the feedstock is the fibrous parts of plants which are not viable sources of food or feed. The energy used to drive the process is derived from the combustion of the feedstock and there is minimal input of external sources of energy, (mainly for the construction of the gasifier and associated machinery). The products of gasification are a combustible gas and a carbon-rich residue (biochar). The gas can be used to drive an internal combustion engine linked to an alternator producing electricity; while the biochar when returned to the soil can be a sink for sequestering carbon and a means of improving soil fertility.
The role of livestock in the farming system is emphasized as the means of optimizing the use of highly productive perennial crops such as sugar cane and multi-purpose trees. Sugar cane is easily separated into energy-rich juice which can replace cereal grains in feeding of pigs and residual bagasse which is one of the feed-stocks of the gasifier. Forage trees are the natural feed resources for goats which selectively consume the leaves, leaving the fibrous stems as another feedstock for gasification. Sugar cane juice contains no fibre and almost no protein which creates opportunities for use of vegetative sources of protein such as the foliage of perennial plants, among which Taro (Colocacia esculenta) and New Cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) have been found to have many advantages. It is concluded that integrated, small scale, farming systems based around multi-purpose crops and livestock, can provide food, feed and fuel energy with no conflict among these end uses. Gasification of fibrous crop residues produces electricity and a soil conditioner (biochar) that is also a sink for sequestration of atmospheric carbon. Bio-digestion of all liquid wastes produces a gaseous fuel for cooking with alternative use as a complement to the gaseous fuel from the gasifier. The system delivers real benefits for the environment as a negative carbon footprint through carbon sequestration and improvements in soil fertility.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brown LR (2007) Biofuels blunder: massive diversion of U.S grain to fuel cars is raising world food prices, risking political instability. http://www.earth-policy.org/Transcripts/SenateEPW07.htm. Retrieved Mar 2009
D’Souza G, Ikerd J (1996) Small farms and sustainable development: is small more sustainable? J Agr Appl Econ 28(1996):73–83
Dao Thi My Tien, Nguyen Tuyet Giang, Preston TR (2010) A note on ensiling banana pseudo-stem with taro leaves and petioles. In: MEKARN conference 2010, Champasack University, Pakse, Lao PDR. Livestock production, climate change and resource depletion. http://mekarn.org/workshops/pakse/abstracts/tien_agu2.htm
Falvey L (2008) Equity and morality in food and technology – biofuels or food? Science Alert. http://www.sciencealert.com.au/opinions/20082808-17872.html
Glaser B (2007) Prehistorically modified soils of central Amazonia: a model for sustainable agriculture in the twenty-first century. Philos Trans R Soc 362:187–196. http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/362/1478/187.full
Hall CAS, the “EROI study team” (2008) Provisional results from EROI assessments. The Oil Drum. http://www.theoildrum.com/node/3810
Hall CAS, Balogh S, Murphy DJR (2009) What is the minimum EROI that a sustainable society must have? Energies 2:25–47. http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/2/1/25/pdf
Heinberg R, Bomford M (2009) The food and farming transition: toward a post carbon food system. Post Carbon Institute. http://pc-ds.webvanta.com/files/PCI-food-and-farming-transition.pdf
Hole D, Perkins S, Wilson J, Alexander I, Grice P, Evans A (2005) Does organic farming benefit biodiversity? Biol Conserv 122:113–130
Kahn BM, Zaks D (2009) Investing in agriculture: far-reaching challenge, significant opportunity (An asset management perspective). http://www.db.com/usa/download/Ag_whitepaper_062409.pdf
Kass ML, Van Soest PJ, Pond WG, Lewis B, McDowell RE (1980) Utilization of dietary fiber from alfalfa by growing swine. I. Apparent digestibility of diet components in specific segments of the gastrointestinal tract. J Anim Sci 50:175–181. http://jas.fass.org/cgi/reprint/50/1/175.pdf
Kormondy EJ (1969) Concepts of ecology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Lehmann J (2007) A handful of carbon. Nature 447:143–144
Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) (2009) Biochar for environmental management; science and technology. Earthscan, London/Sterling
Leterme P, London Angela M, Fernando E, Souffrant Wolfgang B, Andr B (2005) Chemical composition, nutritive value and voluntary intake of tropical tree foliage and cocoyam in pigs. J Sci Food Agric 85:1725–1732
Mena A, Elliott R, Preston TR (1981) Sugar cane juice as an energy source for fattening pigs. Trop Anim Prod 6(4):338. http://www.utafoundation.org/UTAINFO1/TAP/TAP64/64_338.pdf
Ngo Huu Toan, Preston TR (2007) Evaluation of uncultivated vegetables for pigs kept in upland households. Livest Res Rural Dev 19, Article #150. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/10/toan19150.htm
Nguyen Xuan Ba, Vu Duy Giang, Le Duc Ngoan (2005) Ensiling of mulberry foliage (Morusalba) and the nutritive value of mulberry foliage silage for goats in central Vietnam. Livest Res Rural Dev 17, Art. No. 15. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd17/2/ba17015.htm
OECD-FAO (2009) Agricultural outlook 2009–2018. http://www.agri-outlook.org/dataoecd/2/31/43040036.pdf
Ogle RB (2006) Forages for pigs: nutritional, physiological and practical implications. In: Workshop-seminar “Forages for pigs and rabbits” MEKARN-CelAgrid, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 22–24 Aug 2006. Article #1. http://www.mekarn.org/proprf/ogle.htm
Pathoummalangsy Khamparn, Preston TR (2008) Effects of supplementation with rumen fermentable carbohydrate and sources of ‘bypass’ protein on feed intake, digestibility and N retention in growing goats fed a basal diet of foliage of Tithonia diversifolia. Livest Res Rural Dev 20(supplement). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/supplement/kham20076.htm
Patzek TW (2007) How can we outlive our way of life; paper prepared for the 20th round table on sustainable development of biofuels: is the cure worse than the disease? OECD Headquarters, Chateau de la Muette, Paris, 11–12 Sept 2007. http://petroleum.berkeley.edu/papers/Biofuels/OECDSept102007TWPatzek.pdf
Peng Buntha, Khieu Borin, Preston TR, Ogle B (2008) Survey of taro varieties and their use in selected areas of Cambodia. Livest Res Rural Dev 20(supplement). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/supplement/bunt1.htm
Preston TR (2001) Potential of cassava in integrated farming systems. Cassava as livestock feed (23–25 July 2001) in Khon Kaen University. http://www.mekarn.org/procKK/pres.htm
Preston TR (2006) Forages as protein sources for pigs in the tropics. In: Workshop-seminar “Forages for Pigs and Rabbits” MEKARN-CelAgrid, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 22–24 Aug 2006. Article #2. http://www.mekarn.org/proprf/preston.htm
Preston TR (2014) The role of biochar in farming systems producing food and energy from biomass. In: Goreau T, Larson R, Campe J (eds) Geotherapy: innovative methods of soil fertility restoration, carbon sequestration, and reversing CO2 increase. Earthscan, Oxford
Preston TR, Rodríguez L (2004) Production and utilization of cassava foliage for livestock in integrated farming systems. Livest Res Rural Dev 16, Article No. 28. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd16/5/pres16028.htm
Preston TR, Rodríguez L (2009) Energy returned on energy invested (EROEI); the case for gasification as a component of an integrated live stock based farming system. Livest Res Rural Dev 21, Article #195. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd21/11/pres21195.htm
Rapier R (2009) Renewable fuel pretenders. The Oil Drum. Posted 3 Sept 2009. http://www.theoildrum.com/node/5733
Rodríguez L, Preston TR (2009a) A note on ensiling the foliage of New Cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium). Livest Res Rural Dev 21, Article #183. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd21/11/rodr21183.htm
Rodríguez L, Preston TR (2009b) Effect of planting method on biomass yield of New Cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium). Livest Res Rural Dev 21, Article #137. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd21/8/rodr21137.htm
Rodríguez L, Preston TR (2010) Gasification of fibrous crop residues and live stock production; essential elements in establishing carbon-negative farming systems. Livest Res Rural Dev 22, Article #10. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/1/rodr22010.htm
Rodríguez L, Lopez DJ, Preston TR, Peters K (2006) New Cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) leaves as partial replacement for soybean meal in sugar cane juice diets for growing pigs. Livest Res Rural Dev 18, Article #91. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd18/7/rodr18091.htm
Rodríguez L, Irina P, Preston TR, Peters K (2009a) Nutritive value for pigs of New Cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium); digestibility and nitrogen balance with different proportions of fresh leaves and soybean meal in a basal diet of sugar cane juice. Livest Res Rural Dev 21, Article #16. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd21/1/rodr21016.htm
Rodríguez L, Preston TR, Peters K (2009b) Studies on the nutritive value for pigs of New Cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium); digestibility and nitrogen balance with different levels of ensiled leaves in a basal diet of sugar cane juice. Livest Res Rural Dev 21, Article #27. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd21/2/rodr21027.htm
Rodríguez L, Salazar P, Preston TR (2009c) Effect of biochar and biodigester effluent on growth of maize in acid soils. Livest Res Rural Dev 21, Article #110. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd21/7/rodr21110.htm
Rosset P (1999) Small is bountiful. The Ecologist, vol 29, December. http://www.mindfully.org/Farm/Small-Farm-Benefits-Rosset.htm
Theng Kouch, Preston TR, Ly J (2003) Studies on utilization of trees and shrubs as the sole feedstuff by growing goats; foliage preferences and nutrient utilization. Livest Res Rural Dev 15(7). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd15/7/kouc157.htm
Yao J, Yan B, Wang XQ, Liu JX (2000) Nutritional evaluation of mulberry leaves as feeds for ruminants. Livest Res Rural Dev 12 (2) Art. #12. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd12/1/yao122.htm
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Preston, R., Rodríguez, L. (2014). Food and Energy Production from Biomass in an Integrated Farming System. In: Ozier-Lafontaine, H., Lesueur-Jannoyer, M. (eds) Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 14. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06016-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06016-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06015-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06016-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)