We Went to the Restroom or Something’. General Extenders and Stuff in the Speech of Dutch Learners of English

Chapter
Part of the Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics book series (YCLP, volume 2)

Abstract

This chapter investigates how learners of English who are native speakers of Dutch use general extenders such as and stuff and or something. The corpus consists of the Dutch component of the Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage (LINDSEI), which is comprised of 50 interviews of some 15 min each. These data are compared with the Louvain Corpus of Native English Conversation (LOCNEC), LINDSEI’s native speaker reference corpus. The study shows that overall frequencies of general extenders point at a close alignment of the two speaker groups, but that discrepancies exist if these numbers are further broken down for the adjunctive and disjunctive categories of general extenders. The former type is used considerably less frequently in the learner corpus than in the native, whereas the opposite holds for the latter. A detailed qualitative and quantitative analysis offers a few tentative explanations for the learners’ choice of general extenders, most notably L1 transfer, the intensity of exposure to certain forms in the target language, and learners’ restricted repertoire of pragmatic devices.

Keywords

General extenders Vague language English as a foreign language Learner English Learner corpora Foreign language learning 

References

  1. Aijmer, K. (2002). English discourse particles. Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aijmer, K. (2004). Pragmatic markers in spoken interlanguage. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 3, 173–190.Google Scholar
  3. Aijmer, K. (2013). Understanding pragmatic markers. A variational pragmatic approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berkley, S. (2002). How to cure the verbal virus. A five-step treatment plan. School for Champions. http://www.school-for-champions.com/speaking/verbalvirus.htm. Accessed 23 July 2013.
  5. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  6. Brinton, L. J. (1996). Pragmatic markers in English. Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buysse, L. (2011). The business of pragmatics. The case of discourse markers in the speech of students of Business English and English Linguistics. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 161, 10–30.Google Scholar
  8. Buysse, L. (2012). So as a multifunctional discourse marker in native and learner speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1764–1782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buysse, L. (Forthcoming). ‘Well it’s economy and so on’. General extenders in learner and native English.Google Scholar
  10. Callies, M. (2013). Advancing the research agenda of Interlanguage Pragmatics: The role of learner corpora. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Yearbook of corpus linguistics and pragmatics 2013. New domains and methodologies (pp. 9–36). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Channell, J. (1994). Vague language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cheshire, J. (2007). Discourse variation, grammaticalisation and stuff like that. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11, 155–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Cock, S. (2004). Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech. BELL. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures New Series, 2, 225–246.Google Scholar
  14. Dines, E. R. (1980). Variation in discourse – and stuff like that. Language in Society, 9, 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dubois, S. (1992). Extension particles, etc. Language Variation and Change, 4, 179–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Evison, J., McCarthy, M., & O’Keeffe, A. (2007). ‘Looking out for love and all the rest of it’: Vague category markers as shared social space. In J. Cutting (Ed.), Vague language explored (pp. 138–157). Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  17. Fernandez, J., & Yuldashev, A. (2011). Variation in the use of general extenders and stuff in instant messaging interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2610–2626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilquin, G. (2008). Hesitation markers among EFL learners: Pragmatic deficiency or difference? In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Pragmatics and corpus linguistics: A mutualistic entente (pp. 119–149). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  19. Gilquin, G., De Cock, S., & Granger, S. (2010). Louvain international database of spoken English interlanguage. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
  20. Hasselgren, A. (2002). Learner corpora and language testing. Smallwords as markers of learner fluency. In S. Granger, J. Hung, & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 143–173). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoffmann, S., Evert, S., Smith, N., Lee, D., & Prytz, Y. B. (2008). Corpus linguistics with BNCweb: A practical guide. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  22. Jucker, A. H. (1993). The discourse marker well: A relevance-theoretical account. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 435–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koester, A. (2007). ‘About twelve thousand or so’: Vagueness in North American and UK offices. In J. Cutting (Ed.), Vague language explored (pp. 40–61). Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  24. Mukherjee, J. (2009). The grammar of conversation in advanced spoken learner English: Learner corpus data and language-pedagogical implications. In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora and language teaching (pp. 203–230). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Müller, S. (2005). Discourse markers in native and non-native English discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Overstreet, M. (1999). Whales, candlelight, and stuff like that: General extenders in English discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Overstreet, M. (2005). And stuff und so: Investigating pragmatic expressions in English and German. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1845–1864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Overstreet, M., & Yule, G. (1997). On being explicit and stuff in contemporary American English. Journal of English Linguistics, 25, 250–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Overstreet, M., & Yule, G. (2002). The metapragmatics of and everything. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 785–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Palacios Martínez, I. M. (2011). “I might, I might go I mean it depends on money things and stuff”. A preliminary analysis of general extenders in British teenagers’ discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2452–2470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parvaresh, V., Tavanger, M., Rasekh, A. E., & Izadi, D. (2012). About his friend, how good she is, and this and that: General extenders in native Persian and non-native English discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Romero-Trillo, J. (2002). The pragmatic fossilization of discourse markers in non-native speakers of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 769–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scott, M. (2008). WordSmith tools version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
  34. Tagliamonte, S. A., & Denis, D. (2010). The stuff of change: General extenders in Toronto, Canada. Journal of English Linguistics, 38, 335–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Terraschke, A. (2007). Use of general extenders by German non-native speakers of English. IRAL, 45, 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Terraschke, A. (2010). Or so, oder so, and stuff like that – General extenders in New Zealand English, German and in learner language. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7, 449–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Terraschke, A., & Holmes, J. (2007). ‘Und tralala’: Vagueness and general extenders in German and New Zealand English. In J. Cutting (Ed.), Vague language explored (pp. 198–220). Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  38. Ward, G., & Birner, B. (1993). The semantics and pragmatics of and everything. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ArtsKU Leuven – University of LeuvenBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations