Advertisement

Automated Data Flow Graph Partitioning for a Hierarchical Approach to Wordlength Optimization

  • Enrique Sedano
  • Daniel Menard
  • Juan A. López
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8405)

Abstract

Modern automatic analytical methods for studying range and accuracy in fixed-point systems are gradually replacing the traditional bit-true fixed-point simulations used in Word-Length Optimization (WLO) problems. But these models have several limitations that must be overcome if they are going to be used in real world applications. When targeting large systems, the mathematical expressions quickly become too large to be handled in reasonable times by numerical engines. This paper proposes adapting the classical Fiduccia-Mattheyses partitioning algorithm to the WLO domain to automatically generate hierarchical partitions of the systems to quantize. This is the first time this type of algorithms are used for this purpose. The algorithm has been successfully applied to large problems that could not be addressed before. It generates, in the order of minutes, maneuverable sub-problems where state-of-the-art models can be applied. Thus, scalability is achieved and the impact of the problem size as a constraint is minimized.

Keywords

Graph Partitioning Stop Criterion Polynomial Chaos Expansion Hierarchical Decomposition Hierarchical Partitioning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shi, C., Brodersen, R.W.: A perturbation theory on statistical quantization effects in fixed-point DSP with non-stationary inputs. In: Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, ISCAS 2004, vol. 3, p. III–373. IEEE (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    López, J.A., Caffarena, G., Carreras, C., Nieto-Taladriz, O.: Fast and accurate computation of the round-off noise of linear time-invariant systems. IET Circuits, Devices & Systems 2(4), 393 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shou, H., Lin, H., Martin, R.R., Wang, G.: Modified affine arithmetic in tensor form for trivariate polynomial evaluation and algebraic surface plotting. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 195(1-2), 155–171 (2006)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Parashar, K., Rocher, R., Menard, D., Sentieys, O.: A Hierarchical Methodology for Word-Length Optimization of Signal Processing Systems. In: 23rd International Conference on VLSI Design, pp. 318–323. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Esteban, L., López, J., Sedano, E., Hernandez-Montero, S., Sanchez, M.: Quantization analysis of the infrared interferometer of the tj-ii stellarator for its optimized fpga-based implementation. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 60, 3592–3596 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fiduccia, C., Mattheyses, R.: A linear-time heuristic for improving network partitions. In: 19th Conference on Design Automation, pp. 241–247 (1982)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    López, J.A., Sedano, E., Esteban, L., Caffarena, G., Fernández-Herrero, A., Carreras, C.: Applications of Interval-Based Simulations to the Analysis and Design of Digital LTI Systems. In: Cuadrado-Laborde, C. (ed.) Applications of Digital Signal Processing. Number i, 1st edn., pp. 279–296. InTech (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sarbishei, O., Radecka, K., Zilic, Z.: Analytical Optimization of Bit-Widths in Fixed-Point LTI Systems. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 31(3), 343–355 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Esteban, L., López, J.A., Sedano, E., Sánchez, M.: Quantization Analysis of the Infrared Interferometer of the TJ-II for its Optimized FPGA-based Implementation. In: IEEE 18th Real Time Conference, RTC 2012, Berkeley, California, USA (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kernighan, B., Lin, S.: An Efficient Heuristic Procedure for Partitioning Graphs. The Bell System Technical Journal 49(1), 291–307 (1970)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hall, K.M.: An r-Dimensional Quadratic Placement Algorithm. Management Science 17(3), 219–229 (1970)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsay, R.S., Kuh, E.: A unified approach to partitioning and placement (VLSI layout). IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems 38(5), 521–533 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bui, T.N., Moon, B.R.: Genetic algorithm and graph partitioning. IEEE Transactions on Computers 45(7), 841–855 (1996)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johnson, E.L., Mehrotra, A., Nemhauser, G.L.: Min-cut clustering. Mathematical Programming 62, 133–151 (1993)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alpert, C.J., Kahng, A.B.: Recent directions in netlist partitioning: a survey. The VLSI Journal on Integration 19(1-2), 1–81 (1995)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim, J., Hwang, I., Kim, Y.H., Moon, B.R.: Genetic approaches for graph partitioning: a survey. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 473–480. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Krishnamurthy, B.: An Improved Min-Cut Algonthm for Partitioning VLSI Networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers C-33(5), 438–446 (1984)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sanchis, L.: Multiple-way network partitioning with different cost functions. IEEE Transactions on Computers 42(12), 1500–1504 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Johnson, D.S., Aragon, C.R., McGeoch, L.A., Schevon, C.: Optimization by Simulated Annealing: An Experimental Evaluation; Part I, Graph Partitioning. Operations Research 37(6), 865–892 (1989)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Berge, C.: Graphs and Hypergraphs. Elsevier (1976)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mathews, V.J., Sicuranza, G.L.: Polynomial Signal Processing. Wiley (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrique Sedano
    • 1
  • Daniel Menard
    • 2
  • Juan A. López
    • 1
  1. 1.ETSI Telecomunicación (UPM)MadridSpain
  2. 2.INSA/IETRRennesFrance

Personalised recommendations