The Effects of Effort-Feedback on Time Spent for Information Processing in Multi-criteria Decision Making
When making decisions, many people tend to rely on their instinctive choices instead of trusting and adopting those suggested by decision support systems. Feedback interventions can be used to subliminally direct and assist decision makers’ attention to increase the accuracy of the decision. This paper seeks to further develop our understanding of such persuasive decision aids for a preferential choice problem. For this purpose, we applied an experiment design with either enabled or disabled feedback interventions in a self-developed computerized decision aid with varying decision complexities. We applied continuous feedback mechanisms using normative rules to evaluate the participants’ time investments during their information processing stage. Our findings demonstrate that normative effort feedback impacts both time spent on single items and time spent for overall decision processing. We conclude that effort feedback can be a viable feedback option to implement in decision aids.
KeywordsDecision Aid Decision-making Cognitive decision support multicriteria decision making decision support systems
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Bernroider, E.W.N., Koch, S.: Decision Making for ERP-Investments from the Perspective of Organizational Impact - Preliminary Results from an Empirical Study. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 1999, pp. 773–775. Association for Information Systems AIS, Milwaukee WI (1999)Google Scholar
- 4.Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R., Johnson, E.J.: The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press (1993)Google Scholar
- 11.Wang, W., Benbasat, I.: Interactive decision aids for consumer decision making in e-commerce: The influence of perceived strategy restrictiveness. MIS Quarterly 33, 293–293 (2009)Google Scholar
- 12.Davern, M., Shaft, T., Te’eni, D.: Cognition Matters: Enduring Questions in Cognitive IS Research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 13, 1–1 (2012)Google Scholar
- 21.Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., Landay, J.: The design of eco-feedback technology. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1999–2008. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
- 22.Loock, C.M., Staake, T., Landwehr, J.: Green IS Design and Energy Conservation: An Empirical Investigation of Social Normative Feedback. In: ICIS 2011 Proceedings, pp. 1–15. Curran Associates Inc., New York (2011)Google Scholar
- 24.Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 24, 28–28 (2009)Google Scholar
- 26.Bernroider, E.W.N., Mitlöhner, J.: Social Choice Aggregation Methods for Multiple Attribute Business Information System Selection. In: Ninth International Conference on Business Information Systems, BIS, pp. 267–276. Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn Germany (2006)Google Scholar