Quantitative Scenario-Based Assessment of Contextual Factors for ICT4D Projects: Design and Implementation in a Web Based Tool

  • Anton Talantsev
  • Aron Larsson
  • Florence Nameere Kivunike
  • David Sundgren
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 275)

Abstract

The success of a development intervention is primarily defined by its longer-term results. Information and Communication Technology for Development (ICT4D) projects are no exception. In particular, the external context in which such projects are to be deployed plays a crucial role for achieving better development results. Thus, an analysis of contextual factors is essential for decision-makers at the project proposal screening and evaluation. Guided by the results-based management framework, a tool for influence assessment of contextual factors is designed and presented in this paper. The tool comprises a suggested model for common ICT4D contextual factors and a complementing method for their assessment. The method employs a scenario-based judgments elicitation process for data extraction together with Monte-Carlo simulation for data processing and aggregation. While the tool is not intended for comprehensive and deep analysis, the underlying streamlined process along with the easy to interpret assessment results arguably ensure further wide adoption.

Keywords

Project evaluation risk analysis opportunity analysis decision support system sensitivity analysis contextual factors ICT4D 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    United Nations Development Group: Results-Based Management HANDBOOK. United Nations Development Group (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heeks, R., Molla, A.: Compendium on impact assessment of ICT-for-development projects. IDRC, Manchester (retrieved December 2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sen, A.: Development as Freedom. OUP, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hatakka, M., Ater, S., Obura, D., Mibei, B.: Back to basics: Why (some) ICT4D projects still struggle. Presented at the Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hatakka, M., De, R.: Development, capabilities and technology: an evaluative framework. In: Presented at the 11th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, Kathmandu (May 2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prakash, A., De, R.: Importance of development context in ICT4D projects: A study of computerization of land records in India. Information Technology & People 20, 262–281 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zheng, Y., Walsham, G.: Inequality of what? Social exclusion in the e-society as capability deprivation. Information Technology & People 21, 222–243 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ibrahim-Dasuki, S., Abbott, P., Kashefi, A.: The Impact of ICT Investments on Development Using the Capability Approach: The case of the Nigerian Pre-paid Electricity Billing System. The African Journal of Information Systems 4, 30–45 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    International Organization for Standardization: INTERNATIONAL STANDARD Risk management - Principles and guidelines 31000:2009. ISO (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Bakker, K., Boonstra, A.: Risk management affecting IS/IT project success through communicative action. Project Management Journal (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karlsen, J.T.: Project owner involvement for information and knowledge sharing in uncertainty management. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 3, 642–660 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Olsson, R.: In search of opportunity management: Is the risk management process enough? International Journal of Project Management 25, 745–752 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hillson, D.: Extending the risk process to manage opportunities. International Journal of Project Management 20, 235–240 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    International Organization for Standardization: INTERNATIONAL STANDARD Risk management - Risk assessment techniques IEC/ISO 31010:2009. ISO (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    iMENTORS, imentors.euGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anton Talantsev
    • 1
  • Aron Larsson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Florence Nameere Kivunike
    • 1
  • David Sundgren
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Computer and Systems SciencesStockholm UniversityKistaSweden
  2. 2.Dept. of Information and Communications SystemsMid Sweden UniversitySundsvallSweden

Personalised recommendations