Advertisement

How to Use Activity Theory Contradiction Concept to Support Organization Control

  • Antonio Goncalves
  • Marielba Zacarias
  • Pedro Sousa
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 276)

Abstract

Despite the existing organization control model, it isn’t clear how people choose the appropriate measures, norms and the control values and how to relate them with operation of organization. To solve this challenge we propose to use Activity Theory contradictions concept to help to choose and monitor useful measures, norms and viability values.

Activity Theory is a framework that helps describe human work in an organization. It focuses on the premise that to examine human work, one has to reflect on the individual actions and the dynamic aspects of cooperative works between people. We take advantage of overlap between the DEMO and Activity theory concepts to find relevant control elements from activities gathered from organization DEMO model. We will use the proposed solution via a case study of a service (e.g., True-Kare) that allows someone to provide a remote assistance to another person by using a mobile phone.

Keywords

Activity Theory Ontological Model Cooperative work Dynamic Work Context 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Engeström, Y., Brown, K., Christopher, L.C., Gregory, J.: Coordination, Cooperation, and Communication in the Courts: Expansive Transitions in Legal Work. ISeminal Papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, pp. 369–388. Cambridge University Press (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aveiro, D., Silva, A., Tribolet, J.: Modeling the Function Perspective in ODE: Improving Unknown Exception Handling and Change, pp. 1–16 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dietz, J.: Enterprise Ontology: Theory and Methodology. Springer (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vygotskiǐ, L.S., Cole, M.: Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press (1978) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Engeström, S.A.: Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management 24, 368–387 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Goncalves
    • 1
  • Marielba Zacarias
    • 2
  • Pedro Sousa
    • 3
  1. 1.Campus do IPS, EstefanilhaInstituto Politécnico SetúbalSetúbalPortugal
  2. 2.Universidade Algarve, FaroFaroPortugal
  3. 3.Instituto Superior Tecnico, Campus AlamedaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations