Advertisement

Remote Sensing Based Identification of Painted Rock Shelter Sites: Appraisal Using Advanced Wide Field Sensor, Neural Network and Field Observations

  • Ruman BanerjeeEmail author
  • Prashant K. Srivastava
Chapter
Part of the Society of Earth Scientists Series book series (SESS)

Abstract

Recent advances in remote sensing can map the lithological and geological parameters in a synoptic way and hence opens up new dimensions in archaeological research. This work delineates accurate mappings of sandstone located and documented in the form of a suite of prehistoric rock-shelter sites in the Mirzapur district of Central India. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) techniques have been used to identify, classify and map the region under study using IRS-P6 Advanced Wide Field Sensor (AWiFS). Interpretation of data processing revealed that ANN performed better than MLC for mapping sandstone in and around the area of Mirzapur. A conspicuous pattern has been detected where the painted sandstone shelters followed the natural sandstone or host-rock formations revealing the painting activity. This demonstrates prehistoric social choice in terms of the production and consumption of rock art and the importance of local geology that governs this activity.

Keywords

Remote sensing GIS Sandstone AWiFS ANN MLC Archaeological sites Central India Rock art 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors are extremely grateful to the Archaeological Survey of India, Janpath, New Delhi for the permission to commence field-work in the Mirzapur region of Central India. The first author extends his sincere thanks to the local guides and villagers of Mirzapur and Rewa districts for their cordial and unflinching help and hospitality during the field-work, exploring, documenting and cataloguing several new sites in this region of Central India. The first author received University of Bristol Centenary Research Scholarship which supported this research endeavour. The research travel grants provided by the Graduate School of Arts and Humanities, University of Bristol, are highly appreciated.

References

  1. Allchin B, Allchin FR (1982) The rise of civilization in India and Pakistan. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Banerjee R, Srivastava PK (2013) Reconstruction of contested landscape: detecting land cover transformation hosting cultural heritage sites from central India using remote sensing. Land Use Policy 34(0):193–203. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837713000513
  3. Binford LR (1981) Behavioral archaeology and the “pompeii premise”. J Anthropol Res 37(3):195–208Google Scholar
  4. Bishop YMM, Fienberg SE, Paul W (1975) Holland. Discrete multivariate analysis: theory and practice. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown JA (1889) On some small highly specialized forms of stone implements, found in Asia, North Africa, and Europe. J Anthropol Inst GB Irel 18:134–139Google Scholar
  6. Cockburn J (1894) On flint implements from the Kon ravines of South Mirzapur. J Asiat Soc Bengal Proc 63:21–37Google Scholar
  7. Congalton RG (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 37(1):35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Courty MA, Carbonell E, Vallverdú Poch J, Banerjee R (2012) Microstratigraphic and multi-analytical evidence for advanced neanderthal pyrotechnology at abric romani (capellades, spain). Quat Int 247:294–312Google Scholar
  9. Diao Y, Ganesan D, Mathur G, Shenoy P (2007) Rethinking data management for storage-centric sensor networks. In: CIDR vol 7. pp 22–31Google Scholar
  10. Dixon B, Candade N (2008) Multispectral landuse classification using neural networks and support vector machines: one or the other, or both? Int J Remote Sens 29(4):1185–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drake-Brockman D (1911) Mirzapur: a gazetteer. Superintendent, Government Press, United ProvincesGoogle Scholar
  12. Erdas L (1999) Erdas field guide. Erdas Inc., Atlanta 698Google Scholar
  13. Friedman M, Kandel A (1999) Introduction to pattern recognition: statistical, structural, neural, and fuzzy logic approaches. World Scientific Publishing Co. Inc., SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  14. Gao J (2009) Digital analysis of remotely sensed imagery. McGraw-Hill Professional, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Gasparini L, Manduchi R, Gottardi M, Petri D (2010) Performance analysis of a wireless camera network node. IEEE, pp 1331–1336Google Scholar
  16. Grab SW, Goudie AS, Viles HA, Webb N (2011) Sandstone geomorphology of the golden gate highlands national park, South Africa, in a global context. Koedoe 53(1):01–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gupta M, Srivastava PK (2010) Integrating GIS and remote sensing for identification of groundwater potential zones in the hilly terrain of pavagarh, gujarat, india. Water Int 35(2):233–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jaiswal RK, Saxena R, Mukherjee S (1999) Application of remote sensing technology for land use/land cover change analysis. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 27(2):123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jalan S, Sokhi BS (2012) Comparison of different pan-sharpening methods for spectral characteristic preservation: multi-temporal CARTOSAT-1 and IRS-P6 LISS-IV imagery. Int J Remote Sens 33(18):5629–5643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kandrika S, Roy P (2008) Land use land cover classification of orissa using multi-temporal irs-p6 awifs data: a decision tree approach. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 10(2):186–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kavzoglu T, Colkesen I (2009) A kernel functions analysis for support vector machines for land cover classification. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 11(5):352–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lasaponara R, Masini N (2012) Remote sensing in archaeology: From visual data interpretation to digital data manipulation. In: Satellite Remote Sensing. Springer, Netherlands, pp 3–16Google Scholar
  23. Luard C (1907) Rewa state gazetteer, vol IV. (Text and Tables), p 90Google Scholar
  24. Misra V (2001) Prehistoric human colonization of India. J Biosci 26(4):491–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mol L, Viles H (2010) Geoelectric investigations into sandstone moisture regimes: Implications for rock weathering and the deterioration of san rock art in the golden gate reserve, South Africa. Geomorphology 118(3):280–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mukherjee S (2004) Textbook of environmental remote sensing. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Mukherjee S, Shashtri S, Singh C, Srivastava P, Gupta M (2009) Effect of canal on land use/land cover using remote sensing and GIS. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 37(3):527–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mustapha M, Lim H, Jafri MZM (2010) Comparison of neural network and maximum likelihood approaches in image classification. J Appl Sci 10(22):2847–2854 (Faisalabad)Google Scholar
  29. Oommen T, Misra D, Twarakavi NKC, Prakash A, Sahoo B, Bandopadhyay S (2008) An objective analysis of support vector machine based classification for remote sensing. Math Geosci 40(4):409–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pappu S, Akhilesh K, Ravindranath S, Raj U (2010) Applications of satellite remote sensing for research and heritage management in indian prehistory. J Archaeol Sci 37(9):2316–2331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pappu, S, Akhilesh K., Ravindranath S, Raj U, Gunnell Y (2010b) Research and management of palaeolithic resources in Tamil Nadu, South India. Antiquity 84(325):1596–1599Google Scholar
  32. Pratap A, Kumar N (2009) Painted rockshelters at Wyndham falls, Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, India. Antiquity 83(321):891Google Scholar
  33. Punia M, Joshi P, Porwal M (2011) Decision tree classification of land use land cover for Delhi, India using IRS-P6 AWiFS data. Expert Syst Appl 38(5):5577–5583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rumelhart DE (1989) The architecture of mind: a connectionist approach. In: Posner MI (ed.). Foundations of cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 133–159Google Scholar
  35. Schalkoff RJ (1997) Artificial neural networks. McGraw-Hill Companies, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Shukla A, Arora M, Gupta R (2010) Synergistic approach for mapping debris-covered glaciers using optical–thermal remote sensing data with inputs from geomorphometric parameters. Remote Sens Environ 114(7):1378–1387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Srivastava PK, Gupta M, Mukherjee S (2012a) Mapping spatial distribution of pollutants in groundwater of a tropical area of india using remote sensing and gis. Appl Geomatics 4(1):21–32. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12518-011-0072-y
  38. Srivastava PK, Han D, Rico-Ramirez MA, Bray M, Islam T (2012b) Selection of classification techniques for land use/land cover change investigation. Adv Space Res 50(9):1250–1265. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117712004218
  39. Srivastava PK, Mukherjee S, Gupta M (2010) Impact of urbanization on land use/land cover change using remote sensing and GIS: a case study. Int J Ecol Econ Stat 18(S10):106–117Google Scholar
  40. Tiwari R (2011) Assessment of groundwater quality and pollution potential of Jawa block Rewa district, Madhya Pradesh, India. Proc Int Acad Ecol Environ Sci 1(3–4):202–212Google Scholar
  41. Tiwari SK (2000) Riddles of Indian rockshelter paintings. Sarup & Sons, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  42. Townshend J, Justice C, Li W, Gurney C, Mcmanus J (1991) Global land cover classification by remote sensing: present capabilities and future possibilities. Remote Sens Environ 35(2):243–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Varshney PK, Arora MK (2004) Advanced image processing techniques for remotely sensed hyperspectral data. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  44. Yu L, Zhang D, Holden EJ (2008) A fast and fully automatic registration approach based on point features for multi-source remote-sensing images. Comput Geosci 34(7):838–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Archaeology and AnthropologyUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations