Abstract
Graphic organizers such as concept mapping help instructors and students organize information visually. For instructors, concept maps help in the planning and presentation of course material through visual means to demonstrate how ideas, concepts, and topics are related. Concept maps can also offer students an alternative way to structure content, comprehend the relationships between topics, and present their understanding to others. This pilot case study demonstrates how an instructor of a graduate course uses concept maps to structure textbook material. Instead of using text notes and traditional outlines to highlight certain information in the textbook, the instructor uses concept maps to present the information visually. Student responses concerning the use of concept maps are also addressed in the case study. As a result, the instructor discovered that although concept maps were much more difficult to design initially, graduate students appeared to enjoy the option of reviewing a visual organizer of the key points in the textbook chapters than reading text-based notes. Concept maps accommodated the various learning styles of the students and helped the instructor organize course content.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
All, A. C., Huycke, L. I., & Fisher, M. J. (2003). Instructional tools for nursing education: Concept maps. Nursing Education Perspectives, 24(6), 311–317.
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view(2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Axelrod, R. (1973). Schema theory: An information processing model of perception and cognition. The American Political Science Review, 67(4), 1248–1266.
Ayres, P., & Pass, F. (2012). Cognitive load theory: New directions and challenges. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 827–832. doi:10.1002/acp.2882
Blunt, J. R., & Karpicke, J. D. (2014). Learning with retrieval-based concept mapping. Journal Educational Psychology, 106, 849–858.
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210.
Daugherty, J. L., Custer, R. C., & Dixon, R. A. (2012). Mapping concepts for learning and assessment. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 71(8), 10–14.
Dexter, D. D., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34, 51–72
Edwards, S., & Cooper, N. (2010). Mind mapping as a teaching resource. The Clinical Teacher, 7, 236–239.
Harris, C. M., & Zha, S. (2013). Concept mapping: A critical thinking technique. Education, 134(2), 207–211.
Hay, D., Kinchin, I., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2008). Making Learning Visible: The Role of Concept Mapping in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 295–311.
Kamble, S. K., & Tembe, B. L. (2013). Teaching of the second law of thermodynamics: Evaluation of learners’ concept maps. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 20(2), 17–21.
Kim, A.H., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J, & Wei, S. (2004). Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: A synthesis of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 105–118.
Lerner, J. (2000). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Mayer, R.E. (2003). Learning and instruction.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations (pp. 49–78). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Novak, J. D., & Canas, A. J. (2007). Theoretical origins of concept maps, how to construct them, and uses in education. Reflecting Education, 3(1), 29–42.
O’Bannon, B., & Puckett, K. (2010). Preparing to use technology: A practical guide to curriculum integration. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Paxman, C. (2011). Map your way to speech success! Employing mind mapping as a speech preparation technique. Communication Teacher, 25(1), 7–11.
Rye, J., Landenberger, R., & Warner, T. A. (2013). Incorporating concept mapping in project-based learning: Lessons from watershed investigations. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 22(3), 79–392. doi:10.1007/s10956-012-9400-1
Silverman, L. K. (2002). Upside-down brilliance: The visual-spatial learner . Denver: DeLeon Pub.
Wahidin, K.O., & Meerah, S. M. (2013). Concept mapping in chemistry lessons: Tools for inculcating thinking skills in chemistry learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(5), 666–681.
Yen, J., Lee, C., & Chen, I. (2012). The effects of image-based concept mapping on the learning outcomes and cognitive processes of mobile learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 307–320. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8535.2011.01189.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hartsell, T. (2015). Mapping Concepts for Learning. In: Baylen, D., D'Alba, A. (eds) Essentials of Teaching and Integrating Visual and Media Literacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05837-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05837-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05836-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05837-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)