Advertisement

Passenger Car Equivalents and Other Adjustment Factors

  • Roger P. RoessEmail author
  • Elena S. Prassas
Chapter
Part of the Springer Tracts on Transportation and Traffic book series (STTT, volume 5)

Abstract

It has been said that most of the methodologies of the Highway Capacity Manual involve a series of adjustments to what are relatively simple basic numbers.

Keywords

Transportation Research Adjustment Factor Heavy Vehicle Traffic Stream Service Volume 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Highway Capacity Manual, Bureau of Public Roads. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C (1950)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 87. Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C (1965)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209. Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C (1985)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Walker, W.P.: Influence of Bridge Widths on Transverse Positions of Vehicles. In: Proceedings of the Highway Research Board, vol. 21. Highway Research Board, Washington DC (1941)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keese, C.J., Pinnell, C., McCosland, W.R.: A Study of Freeway Traffic Operation, Highway Research Bulletin 235. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC (1960)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keese, C.J., Pinnell, C., McCosland, W.R.: A Study of Freeway Traffic Operation. Highway Research Bulletin 235. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC (1960)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taragin, A.: Driver Behavior as Related to Shoulder Type and Width on Two-Lane Highways. Highway Research Bulletin 170. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC (1957)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scheon, J., May Jr., A.D., Reilly, W., Urbanik, T.: Speed-Flow Relationships for Basic Freeway Segments. Final Report, NCHRP Project 3-45. JHK & Associates, Tucson (May 1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reilly, W., Harwood, D., Scheon, J.: Capacity and Level of Service Procedures for Multilane Rural and Suburban Highways. Final Report, NCHRP Project 3-33. JHK & Associates, Tucson(1989)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Curren, J.E.: Use of Shoulders and Narrow Lanes to Increase Freeway Capacity. NCHRP Report 369. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC (1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cunagin, W., Messer, C.: Passenger Car Equivalents for Rural Highways. Final Report, Project DTFH 61-80-C-00128, H.G. Whyte Associates and Texas Transportation Institute, College Station TX (December 1982)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Werner, A.: Effect of Recreational Vehicles on Highway Capacity. M.S.Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, Canada (April 1974)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Newman, L., Moskowitz, K.: Effect of Grades on Service Volumes. Highway Research Record 99. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC (1965)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moskowitz, K., Newman, L.: Notes on Freeway Capacity. Bulletin No. 4, California Division of Highways, Sacramento CA (July 1962)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Messer, C.J.: Two-Lane, Two-Way Rural Highway Capacity. Final Report, NCHRP Project 3-28(A). Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station TX (February 1983)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    St. John, A.D., et al.: Freeway Design and Control Strategies as Affected by Trucks and Traffic Regulations. Final Report, Project FHWA-RD-75-42, Midwest Research Institute (April 1975)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Review of Vehicle Weight to Horsepower Ratio as Related to Passing Lane Design, Final Report, NCHRP Project 20-7, Penn State University, State College PA (1972)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Linzer, E., Roess, R., McShane, W.: Effects of Trucks, Buses, and Recreational Vehicles on Freeway Capacity and Service Volume. Transporta-tion Research Record 699. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC (1979)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harwood, D., Hoban, C.: Low-Cost Methods for Improving Traffic Operations on Two-Lane Roads. Informational Guide, Project FHWA IP-87/2. Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC (January 1987)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Elefteriadou, L., Torbic, D., Webster, N.: Development of Passenger Car Equivalents for Freeways, Two-Lane Highways, and Arterials. Transportation Research Record 1572. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC (1997)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    FRESIM 5.0, Office of Safety and Traffic Operations. Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC (March 1995)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    St. John, A., Harwood, D.: TWOPAS User’s Guide, Office of Safety and Traffic Operations. Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC (May 1986)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roess, R., Prassas, E., Ulerio, J.: Levels of Service in Shared-Permissive Left-Turn Lane Groups and Signalized Intersections. Final Report, Polytechnic University, Brooklyn NY (1989)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Roess, R., Prassas, E., McShane, W.: Traffic Engineering, 4th edn. Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EmeritusNYU Polytechnic School of EngineeringNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Transportation EngineeringNYU Polytechnic School of EngineeringNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations