Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intermodal Transport-Based Supply Chain Developments in Turkish Automotive Industry: The Case of Ford Otosan

  • Chapter
Supply Chain Design and Management for Emerging Markets

  • 2099 Accesses

Abstract

Although the literature about supply chain management has mostly focused on developed economies with highly improved intermodal transport systems, there is a need for the investigation of newly emerging markets such as Turkey in terms of intermodal transport and supply chains. Turkey’s strategic location, increasing international trade, especially following the Customs Union Agreement with EU, and the growing role of Turkey in trade with Central Asia, Middle East, Caucasus and Mediterranean regions make the focus on intermodal transport more profound for the companies operating in supply chains. Turkey has become a centre of global automotive production and a centre of excellence, and the automotive industry has become the country’s leading export industry in recent years. As all over the world, the automotive supply chain in Turkey is global and requires complex processes.

This study attempts to explore the new intermodal logistics solution of the Ford Otosan supply chain. Ford Otosan ranks among Turkey’s top ten exporting companies. Main activities of the company include the production assembly and distribution of trucks, pick-ups, mini-buses and cars under Ford license, as well as spare parts and accessories. This case study is focused on inbound logistics activities between the “Consolidation Centre” in Cologne (Germany) and Kocaeli plant (Turkey).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agaran, B., Ulengin, F., Onsel, S., & Aktas, E. (2011). What Turkey expects from logistics outsourcing. 9th International Logistics and Supply Chain Congress: International Retail Logistics in the Value Era, Izmir, Turkey (October 1–17, 27–29).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aksongur, G. (2011). Turkish automotive industry. Turkey: TSKB Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aksongur, G. (2012). Turkish automotive industry. Turkey: TSKB Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballou, R. (1999). Business logistics management-planning, organizing and controlling the supply chain. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banomyong, R., & Beresford, A. (2001). Multimodal transport: The case of Laotian garment exporters. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 31(9), 663–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bask, A. H., Juga, J., & Laine, J. (2001). Problems and prospects for intermodal transport: Theoretical tools for practical breakthroughs? (pp. 1–23). Proceedings of 17th IMP (Industrial Marketing and Purchasing Group)-Conference, Oslo, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayraktar, E., Demirbag, M., Koh, S. C. L., Tatoglu, E., & Zaim, H. (2009). A casual analysis of the impact of information systems and supply chain management practices on operations performance: Evidences from manufacturing SMEs in Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(1), 133–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Button, K. (1990). Environmental externalities and transport policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 6(2), 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetindamar, D., Catay, B., & Basmaci, O. S. (2005). Competition through collaboration: Insights from an initiative in the Turkish textile supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10(4), 238–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2007). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning and operations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. (2005). Logistics and supply chain management (3rd ed.). London: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M., Peck, H., & Towill, D. (2006). A taxonomy for selecting global supply chain strategies. International Journal of Logistics Management, 17(3), 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CORDIS. (1997). Intermodality and intermodal freight transport in the Euroepan Union. Accessed March 24, 2012, from http://cordis.europa.eu/transport/src/taskforce/src/comift.htm

  • Coyle, J. J., Langley, C. J., Gibson, B. J., Novack, R. A., & Bardi, E. J. (2009). Supply chain management: A logistics perspective. Mason, OH: South Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic manoeuvring. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Este, G. (1996). An event-based approach to modelling intermodal transport systems. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 26(6), 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte. (2010). Turkish automotive industry report. Turkey: Republic of Turkey prime ministry investment support and promotion agency of Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denktas Sakar, G. (2010). Transport mode choice decisions and multimodal transport: A triangulated approach. Izmir: Dokuz Eylul University Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt, W., & Clinger, J. (1999). Intermodal freight transportation. Transportation research board. Accessed February 17, 2012, from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/millennium/00061.pdf

  • Erol, I., Velioglu, M. N., Serifoglu, F. S., Buyukozkan, G., Aras, N., Demircan Cakar, N., & Korugan, A. (2010). Exploring reverse supply chain management practices in Turkey. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15(1), 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU. (2011). White paper: Roadmap to a single European transport area-towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system. Accessed June 3, 2012, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri = COM:2011:0144:FIN:EN:PDF

  • Everett, S. (2001, July 18–21). Deregulation, competitive pressures and the emergence of intermodalism (pp. 31–40). Proceedings of International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME) annual conference, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford Otosan. (2012). Accessed June 3, 2012, from http://ford.com.tr

  • Fox, M. L. (1992). The role of transportation planning in supply chain integration. APICS–The Performance Advantage, 2(12), 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayuth, Y. (1987). Intermodality: Concept and practice. London: Lloyd’s of London Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayuth, Y. (1992). Multimodal freight transport. In B. S. Hoyle & R. D. Knowles (Eds.), Modern transport geography (pp. 199–214). London: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henstra, D., Ruijork, C., & Tavasszy, L. (2007). Globalised trade, logistics and intermodality: European perspectives. In T. R. Leinbach & C. Capineri (Eds.), Globalised freight transport, intermodality, e-commerce, logistics and sustainability (pp. 135–163). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, W. E., Eloranta, E., Holmström, J., & Huttuen, K. (2001). Managing the demand-supply chain-value innovations for customer satisfaction. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM. (2009). The smarter supply chain of the future. Automotive industry edition. IBM Corporation. Accessed March 1, 2012, from http://www-304.ibm.com/easyaccess/fileserve?contentid=177557

  • IMF. (2012, May 11). Turkey’s economy: Reforms to strengthen economic stability will help Turkey’s growth and jobs. IMF Survey Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISPAT (Investment Support and Promotion Agency of Turkey). (2012). Economic outlook. Turkey. Accessed July 9, 2012, from http://www.invest.gov.tr

  • Iyigün, S. (2012, November 28). As Turkey’s economy booms, deep inequality persists. Reuters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. C., & Riley, D. W. (1985). Using inventory for competitive advantage through supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management, 15(5), 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, C. (2010). Power of Turkish automotive supply industry. Turkish Automotive Industry, 12(54), 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, S. C. L., Demirbag, M., Bayraktar, E., Tatoglu, E., & Zaim, H. (2007). Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(1), 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozan, K. M., Wasti, N. S., & Kuman, A. (2006). Management of buyer-supplier conflict: The case of the Turkish automotive industry. Journal of Business Research, 59, 662–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2012). Invest in Turkey. İstanbul. Accessed July 26, 2012, from www.kpmg.com.tr

  • Lowe, D. (2006). Intermodal freight transport. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangan, J., Lalwani, C., & Butcher, T. (2008). Global logistics and supply chain management. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. J., & Lalwani, C. (2004, September 9–10). Integrating transport into supply chain to improve supply chain performance (pp. 565–578). Proceedings of 9th Logistics Research Network conference, Dublin, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morash, E. A., & Clinton, S. R. (1997). The role of transport capabilities in international supply chain management. Transportation Journal, 36(3), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, G. (1999). Intermodal freight transportation. Washington, DC: Eno Transportation Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2001). Intermodal freight transport: Institutional aspects. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2002). Transport logistics: Shared solutions to common challenges. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD/ITF. (2009). Intermodal transport, national peer review. Turkey: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OSD (Automotive Manufacturers Association). (2011, December). Automotive industry monthly report.

    Google Scholar 

  • OSD (Automotive Manufacturers Association). (2012, February). Automotive industry monthly report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir, D. (2010). Strategic choice for Istanbul: A domestic or international orientation for logistics? Cities, 27, 154–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, B. E. (2003). Importance of intermodal connectivity and bottleneck elimination. Canadian Transportation Research Forum (CTRF) 38th Annual Conference, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • PWC Turkey. (2011). Doing business in Turkey. İstanbul. Accessed July 26, 2012, from www.pwc.com/tr

  • Rodrigue, J., Comtois, C., & Slack, B. (2006). The geography of transport systems. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saatcioglu, O. Y., Deveci, D. A., & Cerit, A. G. (2009). Logistics and transportation information systems in Turkey: e-Government perspectives. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 3(2), 144–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarıdogan, M. (2012). The impact of green supply chain management on transportation cost reduction in Turkey. International Review of Management and Marketing, 2(2), 112–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savelsberg, E. (2008). Innovation in European freight transportation: Basic, methodology and case studies for the European Markets. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack, B. (2001). Intermodal transportation. In A. M. Brewer, K. J. Button, & D. A. Hensher (Eds.), Handbook of logistics and supply chain management (pp. 141–154). London: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sönmez, A. E. (2011). Automotive and autoparts industries in Turkey. Turkey: Export Promotion Center of Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalk, G., Evans, P., & Shulmn, L. E. (1992). Competing on capabilities: The new rule of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 70, 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stank, T., & Roath, A. (1998). Some propositions on intermodal transportation and logistics facility development: Shipper’s perspective. Transportation Journal, 37(3), 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stölzle, W., Bendul, J., & Kudla, N. (2009). Intermodal transport and supply chains: Moving the global economy. Transport for a Global Economy Forum 2009. Accessed March 11, 2012, from http://www.internationaltransportforum.org/2009/workshops/pdf/ws1-Stolzle.pdf

  • Taniguchi, E., & Nemoto, T. (2008). Intermodal freight transport in urban areas in Japan. In R. Konings, H. Priemus, & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), The future of intermodal freight transport (pp. 58–65). New York: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • TEA (Turkish Exporters Assembly). (2011). Export figures. Turkey: TİM. Accessed August 9, 2012, from http://www.tim.org.tr/tr/ihracat-ihracat-rakamlari-tablolar.html

  • TEA (Turkish Exporters Assembly). (2012). The export road map is now a state document. Turkey: TIM. Accessed August 9, 2012, from http://www.economy.gov.tr/upload/strategy/strategy2023.pdf

  • Tezer, E. (2012). The automotive industry in Turkey “Clustering”. Turkey: Automotive Manufacturers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • TIBA (Turkish Industrialists and Businessmen’s Association). (2007). Transportation industry by its institutional structure, legal framework and indicators. Istanbul: TIBA-T/2007-02/431.

    Google Scholar 

  • TURKSTAT (Turkish Statistical Institute). (2011). Economic indicators, Turkey. Accessed August 9, 2012, from http://www.tuik.gov.tr

  • Ulengin, F., & Uray, N. (1999). Current perspectives in logistics: Turkey as a case study. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 29(1), 22–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulusoy, G. (2003). An assessment of supply chain and innovation management practices in the manufacturing industries in Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics, 86(3), 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2012). World Investment Report 2012: Towards a new generation of investment policies. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Maritime Faculty, Dokuz Eylul University, Tınaztepe Campus, Buca-Izmir, Turkey

    D. Ali Deveci, Gül Denktaş Şakar & Okan Tuna

  2. Ford Otomotiv Sanayi A.Ş., Akpınar Mah. Hasan Basri Cad. No.2, Sancaktepe-İstanbul, Turkey

    Recai Işiktaş

Authors
  1. D. Ali Deveci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gül Denktaş Şakar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Recai Işiktaş
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Okan Tuna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Ali Deveci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Said Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom

    Wojciech Piotrowicz

  2. Said Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom

    Richard Cuthbertson

Questions for Review and Discussion

Questions for Review and Discussion

  1. 1.

    How does the collection procedure in the consolidation centre work in Ford Otosan? What are the major contributions of this system?

  2. 2.

    What is the role of the intermodal transport system in terms of decreasing costs and increasing customer service?

  3. 3.

    What are the contributions of the current system in terms of environmental practices?

  4. 4.

    What are the main advantages achieved through the use of intermodal transportation in global supply chains?

  5. 5.

    What are the main impacts of recent developments in information and communication technologies on intermodal transport systems?

  6. 6.

    What are the main bottlenecks experienced in the case of automotive supply chains considering country-specific factors?

  7. 7.

    Discuss the advantages of the intermodal based supply chain system of Ford Otosan.

  8. 8.

    Discuss the opportunities and challenges of Turkey in terms of foreign direct investments in the automotive industry considering the economic, social, political and geographical factors specific to Turkey.

  9. 9.

    What are the lessons to be learned from the management of the Ford Otosan automotive supply chain system based on intermodal transport?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Deveci, D.A., Şakar, G.D., Işiktaş, R., Tuna, O. (2015). Intermodal Transport-Based Supply Chain Developments in Turkish Automotive Industry: The Case of Ford Otosan. In: Piotrowicz, W., Cuthbertson, R. (eds) Supply Chain Design and Management for Emerging Markets. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05765-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation