Advertisement

Location Data, Purpose Binding and Contextual Integrity: What’s the Message?

  • Mireille Hildebrandt
Chapter
Part of the Law, Governance and Technology Series book series (LGTS, volume 17)

Abstract

This chapter investigates the issue of the proliferation of location data in the light of the ethical concept of contextual integrity and the legal concept of purpose binding. This involves an investigation of both concepts as side constraints on the free flow of information, entailing a balancing act between the civil liberties of individual citizens and the free flow of information. To tackle the issue the chapter starts from Floridi’s proposition that ‘communication means exchanging messages. So even the most elementary act of communication involves four elements: a sender, a receiver, a message, and a referent of the message’ and his subsequent proposal that informational privacy can be described as ‘the freedom from being the referent of a message’. After discussing the current environment of messaging in terms of Big Data Space and the Onlife World, the chapter develops a more detailed definition for the right to informational location privacy. The road to this more detailed definition allows to highlight the balancing act inherent in both contextual integrity and purpose binding, and shows that the most salient challenge for such balancing acts is not—only—that Big Data Space and the Onlife World turn contexts into moving targets. More importantly, the context of economic markets tends to colonize the framing of other contexts, thus also disrupting the protection offered by purpose binding. To safeguard informational privacy we need to engage in new types of boundary work between the contexts of e.g. health, politics, religion, work on the one hand, and the context of economic markets on the other. This ardent task should enable us to sustain legitimate expectations of what location messages are appropriate as well as lawful in a particular context.

Keywords

Cybernetics Messages Contextual integrity Purpose binding Ethics Rule of Law Location privacy Inferences Volunteered data Observed data Inferred data 

References

  1. Amoore, Louise. 2011. Data derivatives. On the emergence of a security risk calculus for our times. Theory, Culture & Society 28 (6): 24–43 (1 November).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altman, Irwin. 1975. The environment and social behavior: Privacy personal space territory crowding. Montery: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  3. Beresford, Alastair R., and Frank Stajano. 2003. Location privacy in pervasive computing. Pervasive Computing 2 (1): 46–55 (January–March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. boyd, danah, and Kate Crawford. 2011. Six provocations for big data. SSRN scholarly paper ID 1926431. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1926431. Accessed 9 April 2014.
  5. Cohen, Julie E. 2007. Cyberspace as/and space. Columbia Law Review 107: 210–256.Google Scholar
  6. De Hert, P., and S. Gutwirth. 2006. Privacy, data protection and law enforcement. Opacity of the individual and transparency of power. In Privacy and the criminal law, eds. Erik Claes, Antony Duff and S. Gutwirth. Oxford: Intersentia (pp. 61–104).Google Scholar
  7. Dubber, Markus Dirk, and Mariana Valverde. 2006. The new police science: The police science in domestic and international governance. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  8. Esposito, Elena. 2011. The future of futures: The time of money in financing and society. UK: Edward Elgar Pub.Google Scholar
  9. Floridi, Luciano, and J. W. Sanders. 2004. On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines 14 (3): 349–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galison, Peter. 1990. Aufbau/Bauhaus: Logical positivism and architectural modernism. Critical Inquiry 16 (4): 709–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gitelman, Lisa. ed. 2013. Raw data is an oxymoron. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gordon, John. 1984. The Alice and Bob after dinner speech. http://downlode.org/Etext/alicebob.html. Accessed 9 April 2014.
  13. Greenfield, Adam. 2006. Everyware: The dawning age of ubiquitous computing. Berkeley: New Riders.Google Scholar
  14. Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (Studies in contemporary German social thought). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hayles, N. Katherine. 1999. How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hildebrandt, M. 2008a. Profiling and the identity of the European citizen. In Profiling the European citizen. Cross-discplinary perspectives, eds. M. Hildebrandt and S Gutwirth. Dordrecht: Springer (pp. 303–343).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hildebrandt, M. 2008b. Governance, governmentality, police and Justice: A new science of police. Buffalo Law Review 56 (2): 557–598.Google Scholar
  18. Hildebrandt, M. 2011. Criminal liability and ‘Smart’ environments. In Philosophical foundations of criminal law, eds. Duff Antony and Green Stuart, 507–532. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hildebrandt, M. 2013a. Slaves to Big Data. Or Are We? IDP. Rrvista De Internet, Derecho Y Politica 16 (forthcoming 2014). http://works.bepress.com/mireille_hildebrandt/52.
  20. Hildebrandt, M. 2013b. Profile transparency by design: Re-enabling double contingency. In Privacy, due process and the computational turn: The philosophy of law meets the philosophy of technology (Hardback)-Routledge, eds. M Hildebrandt and E. De Vries. Abingdon: Routledge (pp. 221–246).Google Scholar
  21. Hildebrandt, M. 2013c Legal protection by design in the smart grid. Report commissioned by the Smart Energy Collective (SEC). Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  22. Hill, Kashmir. 2013. Facebook joins forces with data brokers to gather more intel about users for ads. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2013/02/27/facebook-joins-forces-with-data-brokers-to-gather-more-intel-about-users-for-ads/. Accessed 27 Feb 2013.
  23. Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology; an introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ihde, Don. 1990. Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to Earth (The Indiana series in the philosophy of technology). Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ihde, Don. 2008. Ironic technics. Denmark: Automatic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Leeuw, Karl Maria Michael de, and Jan Bergstra, eds. 2007. The history of information security: A comprehensive handbook. 1st ed. Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  27. Masiello, Betsy, and Alma Whitten. 2010. Engineering Privacy in an Age of Information Abundance. In AAAI Spring Symposium Series, 2010, http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/SSS/SSS10/paper/view/1188.
  28. Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor, and Kenneth Cukier. 2013. Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  29. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1945. Phénoménologie de La Perception. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  30. Morozov, E., and Evgeny Morozov. 2013. To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  31. Nissenbaum, H. F. 2010. Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford: Stanford Law Books.Google Scholar
  32. Prins, Corien. 2006. When personal data, behavior and virtual identities become a commodity: Would a property rights approach matter? SCRIPT-Ed 3 (4): 270–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Purtova, Nadezhda. 2012. Property rights in personal data: A European perspective. Alphen aan den Rijn. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  34. Radbruch, Gustav. 1950. Rechtsphilosophie. Herausgegeven von Erik Wolf. Stuttgart: Koehler.Google Scholar
  35. Radbruch, Gustav. 2006. Five minutes of legal philosophy (1945). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (1): 13–15. http://ojls.oxfordjournals.org/content/26/1/13.short. Accessed 26 Jan 2013.
  36. Ricoeur, Paul. 1976. Interpretation theory. Texas: Texas Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  37. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2005. The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development 6 (1): 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schönfeld, K.M. 2008. Rex, Lex et Judex: Montesquieu and La Bouche de La Loi Revisted. European Constitutional Law Review 4:274–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein. 2008. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Vanderstraeten, Raf. 2007. Parsons, Luhmann and the theorem of double contingency. Journal of Classical Sociology 2 (1): 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Varela, F.J., Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Verbeek, Peter-Paul. 2006. Materializing morality. Design ethics and technological mediation. Science Technology & Human Values 31 (3): 361–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wiener, Norbert. 1948. Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. World Economic Forum. 2011. Personal data: The emergence of a new asset class. http://www.weforum.org/issues/rethinking-personal-data. Accessed 9 April 2014.
  45. World Economic Forum. 2012. Rethinking personal data: Strengthening trust. http://www.weforum.org/issues/rethinking-personal-data. Accessed 9 April 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Computing and Information Sciences (iCIS)Radboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.JurisprudenceErasmus School of Law (ELS)RotterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Law Science Technology & Society studies (LSTS)Vrije UniversiteitBrusselsThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations