Skip to main content

Risk Management in Research and Development: A Case Study from the Semiconductor Industry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technology Development

Part of the book series: Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management ((ITKM))

  • 928 Accesses

Abstract

This paper reviews a completed product development project at a semiconductor manufacturing firm. The data gathered is organized using a Risk Categorization Framework and Behavior Model. Key questions explored include the unpredictable nature of R&D as related to semiconductor manufacturing and the manner in which risk can be better managed in an R&D setting. The research was accomplished through an action research methodology. The researchers have been a part of the development team for over 2 years starting with the planning of the product and ending with the launch of the product. A post launch process helped gather the final data used in this paper

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Boehm B, Basili R (2001) Victor. Software defect reduction top 10 list. Computer, January 2001, pp. 135–137

    Google Scholar 

  2. Christian PH (1993) Project success or project failure: it’s up to you. IM. p. 8

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cule P, Schmidt R, Mark K (2000) Strategies for heading off is project failure. Inform Syst Manag 17(2):65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hallum D, Daim TU (2009) A hierarchical decision model for optimum design alternative selection. Int J Decis Sci Risk Manag 1(Special issue):2–22

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davidow WH (1986) Marketing high technology: an insider’s view. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tesch D, Kloppenborg TJ, Erolick MN (2007) IT project risk factors: the project management professionals perspective. J Comp Inform Syst 47(4):61

    Google Scholar 

  7. Germeraad P (2003) Measuring R&D in 2003. Res Technol Manag 46(6 (Special Issue)):47–56

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tom Gosselin (1993) Negotiating with your boss. Training and Development (May)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harvard Management Update (2000) Why some teams succeed (and so many don’t)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Inganas M, Marxt C (2007) Measuring the science-to-market gap—the case of new energy technologies. Int J Innov Technol Manag 4(4):457–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Keil M, Cule PE, Lyytinen K, Schmidt RC (1998) A framework for identifying software project risks. Commun ACM 41(11):76–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Oz E, Sosik JJ (2000) Why information systems projects are abandoned: A leadership and communication theory and exploratory study. J Comp Inform Syst 41(1):66

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pinto JK (2002) Project management 2002. Res Technol Manag 45(2):22

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pinto JK (1997) The power of project management. Industry Week 246(15):138

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pinto JK, Kharbanda OP (1996) How to fail in project management (without really trying). Bus Horizons 39(4):45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pinto JK, Kharbanda OP (1995) Lessons for an accidental profession. Bus Horizons 38(2):41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmidt R, Lyytinen K, Keil M, Cule P (2001) Identifying soft-ware project risks: an international Delphi study. J Manag Inform Syst 17(4):5

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schultz RL, Slevin DP, Pinto JK (1987) Strategy and tactics in a process model of project implementation. Interfaces 17(3):34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shirahada K, Niwa K (2007) Future-orientated mindset’s contribute to management of corporate R&D personnel motivation in Japan. Int J Innov Technol Manag 4(4):375–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. (2007) Wyeth Pharmaceuticals: spurring scientific creativity with metrics. Product #: 607008

    Google Scholar 

  21. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramin Neshati .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neshati, R., Daim, T.U. (2014). Risk Management in Research and Development: A Case Study from the Semiconductor Industry. In: Daim, T., Neshati, R., Watt, R., Eastham, J. (eds) Technology Development. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05651-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics