Skip to main content

Waiting for the Rule of Law in Brazil: A Meta-legal Analysis of the Insufficient Realization of the Rule of Law in Brazil

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Legal Doctrines of the Rule of Law and the Legal State (Rechtsstaat)

Part of the book series: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ((IUSGENT,volume 38))

  • 1958 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides a broad account of the manifold deficiencies in the implementation of the rule of law in Brazil, offering both legal and extra-legal explanations for this. In doing so, it is contended that it is impossible to properly comprehend and appreciate the obstacles facing the realization of the rule of law in Brazil if confined simply to the observation of legal phenomena. Rather, a proper understanding can be achieved if a more ambitious interdisciplinary analysis is undertaken, addressing the legal, institutional, political and cultural issues of Brazilian society.

“Para os amigos tudo, para os indiferentes nada, e para os inimigos a lei!”

(“For my friends, everything; for strangers, nothing; for my enemies – the law!”) traditional Brazilian saying

I would like to thank Frank Gashumba for his comments on an earlier draft of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan (1651), Ch XIII, para 62.

  2. 2.

    John Locke, Second Treatise on Civil Government (1689), Sec 135.

  3. 3.

    Schor, Miguel, The Rule of Law, in D. Clark (ed.), Encyclopedia of Law and Society: American and Global Perspectives (London/UK: Sage, 2005) at 231.

  4. 4.

    Leoni, Bruno, Freedom and the Law (Los Angeles/CA: Nash Publishing, 1972) at 76.

  5. 5.

    Phillips, Owen H., and Jackson, Paul, O Hood Phillips’ Constitutional and Administrative Law (7th ed., London/UK: Sweet & Maxwell, 1987) at 37.

  6. 6.

    Adriaan Bedner, ‘An Elementary Approach to the Rule of Law’ 2 Hague Journal on the Rule of Law (2010) 50.

  7. 7.

    van Caenegen, R.C., An Historical Introduction to Western Constitutional Law (Cambridge/UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995) at 15.

  8. 8.

    Robert von Mohl, Die Philosophie des Rechts (1837) Vol II, Pt II, quoted in Friedrich A. Hayek, Constitution of Liberty (1960) at 483.

  9. 9.

    Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang, State, Society and Liberty: Studies in Political Theory and Constitutional Law (New York: Berg, 1991) at 50.

  10. 10.

    See Caenegem, supra note 7. At 15.

  11. 11.

    Sundfeld, Carlos A., Fundamentos de Direito Público (4th ed., São Paulo/SP: Malheiros Editores, 2008) at 37–58.

  12. 12.

    Id., at 48.

  13. 13.

    Ferreira Filho, Manoel Gonçalves, Curso de Direito Constitutional (São Paulo/SP: Saraiva, 1999) at 13.

  14. 14.

    For a more comprehensive analysis of Estado de Direito, see: Zimmermann, Augusto, Curso de Direito Constitucional (4th ed., Rio de Janeiro/RJ: Lumen Juris, 2006) at 59–71 & 228–231; see also, Reale, Miguel, O Estado Democrático de Direito e o Conflito das Ideologias (São Paulo: Saraiva, 1999) at 1–13.

  15. 15.

    For an analysis of formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law, see: Paul Craig, “Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law”, 16 Public Law (Autumn 1997) 467; see also Paul Craig, “Constitutional Foundations, the Rule of Law and Supremacy”, 22 Public Law (Spring 2003) 93; see also Augusto Zimmermann, Western Legal Theory: History, Concepts and Perspectives (Sydney/NSW: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2013) at 85–91.

  16. 16.

    Reale, Miguel, O Estado Democrático de Direito e o Conflito das Ideologias (São Paulo: Saraiva, 1999) at 9.

  17. 17.

    John Stuart Mill, Considerations on Representative Government (1861) at 31.

  18. 18.

    Id., at 29.

  19. 19.

    See Martin Krygier, Ethical Positivism and the Liberalism of Fear, in T. Campbell and J. Goldsworthy (eds.), Judicial Power, Democracy, and Legal Positivism (Ashgate: Aldershot, 2000) at 64; see also Martin Krygier, “Transitional Questions about the Rule of Law: Why, What, and How?” Paper delivered at the conference East Central Europe: From Where to Where? East Central Institute for Advanced Study, Budapest, February 15–17, 2001. See also: Martin Krygier, Institutional Optimism, Cultural Pessimism and the Rule of Law, in M. Krygier and A. Czarnota (eds.), The Rule of Law After Communism: Problems and Prospects in East-Central Europe (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1999).

  20. 20.

    Martin Krygier, “False Dichotomies, True Perplexities, and the Rule of Law”. Paper Presented at the Center for the Study of Law and Society, University of California, Berkeley, 2003, at 11.

  21. 21.

    Martin Krygier, “Rule of Law”, in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, N.J. Smelser and P.B. Baltes eds. (2001) at 13404.

  22. 22.

    Martin Krygier, “Compared to What? Thoughts on Law and Justice”, Quadrant Magazine, December 1993, at 52.

  23. 23.

    Krygier, supra note 21. At 13404.

  24. 24.

    Id.

  25. 25.

    Tamanaha, Brian Z., A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society (Oxford/UK: Oxford University Press, 2001) at 140.

  26. 26.

    Weber, Max, Theory of Social and Economic Organization (New York/NY, MacMillan, 1948) at 215.

  27. 27.

    Jennings, Ivor, The Law and the Constitution (London/UK: University of London Press, 1959) at 46.

  28. 28.

    Friedman, Lawrence M., The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective (New York: Russell Sage, 1975) at 193–194.

  29. 29.

    Guillermo O’Donnell, “Delegative Democracy”, 5 Democracy (1994) at 54.

  30. 30.

    Hayek, supra note 8. At 206.

  31. 31.

    Walker, Geoffrey de Q., The Rule of Law: Foundations of Constitutional Democracy (Melbourne/Vic: Melbourne University Press, 1988) at 2.

  32. 32.

    Selzenick, Philip, Legal Cultures and the Rule of Law, in M. Krygier and A. Czarnota (eds.), Rule of Law after Communism (Ashgate: Adershot, 1998) at 37.

  33. 33.

    Noel B. Reynolds, “Grounding the Rule of Law”, 2 Ratio Juris (March 1989) 7.

  34. 34.

    Keith Rosenn comments: “The Brazilian legal culture is highly legalistic; that is, the society places great emphasis upon seeing that all social relations are regulated by comprehensive legislation. There is a strong feeling that new institutions or practices ought not to be adopted without a prior law authorizing them. As has been said with reference to German legalism, there is a ‘horror of a legal vacuum’. Brazil has reams of laws and decrees regulating with great specificity seemingly every aspect of Brazilian life, as well as some aspects of life not found in Brazil. It often appears that if something is not prohibited by law, it must be obligatory”. Keith S. Rosenn, “The Jeito, Brazil’s Institutional Bypass of the Formal Legal System and Its Developmental Implications”, 19 American Journal of Comparative Law (1971) 528.

  35. 35.

    Rosenn, Keith, O Jeito na Cultura Jurídica Brasileira (Rio de Janeiro/RJ: Renovar, 1998) at 54.

  36. 36.

    The Portuguese law was codified, or rather compiled, first in the Ordenações Afonsinas (1446–1457), revised in 1521 as the Ordenações Manuelinas, and finally in the Ordenações Filipinas (1603), also known as the Código Filipino.

  37. 37.

    Rosenn, supra note 35. At 35–36.

  38. 38.

    Norman Nardoff, “Book Review: O Jeito na Cultura Jurídica Brasileira”, 32 University of Miami Inter-American Law Review (Fall 2001) 607.

  39. 39.

    Duarte, Nestor, A Ordem Privada e a Organização Política Nacional (São Paulo/SP: Cia. Editora Nacional, 1950) at 221–22.

  40. 40.

    Faoro, Raymundo, Os Donos do Poder: Formação do Patronato Político Brasileiro (Porto Alegre/RS: Globo, 1975) at 745.

  41. 41.

    Rosenn, supra note 34. At 530.

  42. 42.

    Id., at 531.

  43. 43.

    Rodrigues, José Honório, The Brazilians: Their Character and Aspirations (Austin/TX: University of Texas Press, 1967) at 57.

  44. 44.

    Id., at 63.

  45. 45.

    Keith S. Rosenn, “The Success of Constitutionalism in the United States and Its Failure in Latin America: An Explanation”, 22 University of Miami Inter-American Law Review (1990) 36.

  46. 46.

    See Zimmermann, Augusto, “Constitutions without Constitutionalism: The Failure of Constitutionalism in Brazil” in Mortimer Sellers and Tadeusz Tomaszewski (eds.), The Rule of Law in Comparative Perspective (Springer, 2010), at 101–145; see also Augusto Zimmermann, “Constitutional Rights in Brazil: A Legal Fiction?” 14(2) Murdoch University Law Review (2007) 28–55.

  47. 47.

    Prillaman, William C., The Judiciary and Democratic Decay in Latin America: Declining Confidence in the Rule of Law (London/UK: Praeger, 2000) at 76.

  48. 48.

    Eder, Phanor J., Law and Justice in Latin America (New York/NY: New York University Press, 1937) at 57.

  49. 49.

    Id., at 296.

  50. 50.

    DaMatta, Roberto, Carnivals, Rogues, and Heroes: An Interpretation of the Brazilian Dilemma (Notre Dame/IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1991) at 187–88.

  51. 51.

    DaMatta, Roberto, ‘The Quest for Citizenship in a Relational Universe’, in J.D. Wirth, E.O. Nunes, and T.E. Bogenschild (eds.), State and Society in Brazil: Continuity and Change (London/UK: Westview, 1987) at 317.

  52. 52.

    Rodrigues, supra note. At 57.

  53. 53.

    DaMatta, supra note 51. At 319.

  54. 54.

    Miller, Charlotte I., ‘The Function of Middle-Class Extended Family Networks in Brazilian Urban Society’, in M.L. Margolis and W.E. Carter (eds.), Brazil: Anthropological Perspectives: Essays in Honor of Charles Wagley (New York/NY: Columbia University Press, 1979) at 136.

  55. 55.

    Rosenn, supra note 34. At 523.

  56. 56.

    C.R. Boxer, “The Bay of All Saints”, in History of Latin American Civilization – Vol. 2., L. Hanke ed. (1967) at 164.

  57. 57.

    Freire, Gilberto, ‘The Patriarchal Basis of Brazilian Society’. in J. Maier and R. W. Weatherhead (eds.), Politics of Change in Latin America (New York/NY: Praeger, 1964) at 164.

  58. 58.

    Márcio M. Valença, “Patron-Client Relations and Politics in Brazil: An Historical Overview”, Paper presented at the London School of Economics and Political Science, January 2000, at 8, available at: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/geographyAndEnvironment/research/Researchpapers/rp58.pdf

  59. 59.

    Robert M. Levine, Jeitinho Land. Brazzil Magazine, January 1998, available at: http://www.brazzil.com/content/view/8072/75/

  60. 60.

    Chevigny, Paul, Edge of the Knife: Police Violence in the Americas (New York/NY: New Press, 1995) at 151.

  61. 61.

    Wagley, Charles, An Introduction to Brazil (New York/NY: Columbia University Press, 1971) at 99.

  62. 62.

    Page, Joseph A., The Brazilians (Reading/MA: Addison-Wesley, 1995) at 203.

  63. 63.

    Burns, E. Bradford, A History of Brazil (New York/NY: Columbia University Press, 1970) at 298.

  64. 64.

    Lowenstein, Karl, Brazil made Tremendous Advances, in L. Hanke (ed.), History of Latin American Civilization, Vol. 2 (Irvine/CA: University of California Press, 1967) at 446.

  65. 65.

    Rosenn, supra note 34. At 526.

  66. 66.

    Claphan, Christopher; Clientelism and the State, in C. Claphan (ed.), Private Patronage and Public Power (London/UK: Francis Pinter, 1982) at 25.

  67. 67.

    Rosenn, supra note 34. At 535.

  68. 68.

    Heitor de Paola, “The Concept of Democracy in Latin America”, Hispanic American Center for Economic Research – HACER, July 2006, available at: http://www.hacer.org/current/Brazil109.php

  69. 69.

    Prado, Ney, Razões das Virtudes e Vícios da Constituição de 1988 (São Paulo/SP: Inconfidentes, 1994) at 59. For the purposes of this chapter, statism is defined as an ideology which provides a preferential role for the state in society, placing the state as the main agent of social action and transformation.

  70. 70.

    DaMatta, supra note 51. At 296.

  71. 71.

    Clapham, supra note 65. At 5.

  72. 72.

    Emilio E. Dellasoppa, Corruption in Brazilian Society: An Overview (2001) at 2.

  73. 73.

    Boxer, C.R., The Portuguese Seaborne Empire (1415–1835) (London: Hutchinson, 1969) at 319.

  74. 74.

    Id., at 321.

  75. 75.

    Id., at 322.

  76. 76.

    Graham, Richard; Britain and the Onset of Modernization in Brazil: 1815–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968) at 223.

  77. 77.

    Id., at 216.

  78. 78.

    José Ignácio Silveira da Motta, Degeneração do Sistema Representativo (1869) at 21.

  79. 79.

    Aureliano Candido Tavares Bastos, A Província: Estudo sobre a Descentralização no Brasil (1870) at 264.

  80. 80.

    Prillaman, supra note 47. At. 9.

  81. 81.

    The etymological root of the word corruption comes from the Latin corruptus, which literally means the act of breaking an object. Conceptually, it describes any situation of abuse of power for private gains by means of fraud, bribery, extortion (payment for favourable government decisions) and embezzlement (theft of state funds).

  82. 82.

    Montaner, Carlos Alberto, Culture and the Behaviour of Elites in Latin America, From: L.E. Harrison and S. Huntington (eds.); ‘Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress’ (New York: Basic Books, 2000) at 58.

  83. 83.

    Dellasopa, Emilio E.; Corruption in Brazilian Society: An Overview (Rio de Janeiro: FSS/UERJ, 2001) at 3.

  84. 84.

    Boxer, supra note 72. At 209.

  85. 85.

    Id., at 144.

  86. 86.

    Id., at 324.

  87. 87.

    Maria Dundas Graham (Lady Maria Calcott), Journal of a Voyage to Brazil and Residence There. During Part of the Years 1821, 1822, 1823 (1969) at 30.

  88. 88.

    Diffie, Bailey W. and Winius, George D.; Foundations of the Portuguese Empire 1415–1580 (Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 1977) at 419.

  89. 89.

    Id.

  90. 90.

    Gordon, Lincoln; Brazil’s Second Chance: En Route Toward the First World (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2001) at 159.

  91. 91.

    Alana Gutierrez, “Bush Should Use Brazil’s Corruption to Show Real Friendship”, Brazzil Magazine, September 14, 2005, available at: http://www.brazzil.com/content/view/9399/76/

  92. 92.

    John Otis, “Government Corruption at New Heights in Brazil”, Houston Chronicle, October 16, 2005, available at: http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/headline/world/3399089

  93. 93.

    According to sociology professor James Petras, “every sector of President Lula’s Workers’ Party [was] implicated in bribery, fraud, vote buying, theft of public funds, failure to report illicit campaign financing, and a host of other felonious behaviour … All of Lula’s closest and most important advisers, congressional leaders and party bosses [were involved in] illegal large-scale transfers of funds into electoral campaigns, private enrichment, and financing full time functionaries” – James Petras, “Lula’s Workers Regime Plummets in Stew of Corruption”, Counterpunch, July 30–31, 2005, available at: http://www.counterpunch.org/petras08012005.html

  94. 94.

    Carvalho, José Murilo de, The Struggle for Democracy in Brazil: Possible Lessons for Nigeria, (Port Harcourt: SEPHIS/University of Port Harcourt, 2000) at 11.

  95. 95.

    Id.

  96. 96.

    Krygier, supra note 21. At 13404.

  97. 97.

    Krygier, supra note 22. At 52.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Augusto Zimmermann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zimmermann, A. (2014). Waiting for the Rule of Law in Brazil: A Meta-legal Analysis of the Insufficient Realization of the Rule of Law in Brazil. In: Silkenat, J., Hickey Jr., J., Barenboim, P. (eds) The Legal Doctrines of the Rule of Law and the Legal State (Rechtsstaat). Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05585-5_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics