Abstract
In this chapter, we continue our discussion of the resolution of the second question central to the improvement of engineering education—How can we do better at ensuring that students learn these skills? In Chap. 4, we examined how the curriculum can be restructured and re-tasked in order to strengthen the links between the disciplines and weave the necessary skills into the curriculum plan. In this chapter, we examine perhaps the most important device to meet the demands placed on an integrated engineering curriculum, namely, design-implement experiences.
This chapter is written with the support of authors Stefan Hallström, Jakob Kuttenkeuler, Robert J. Niewoehner and Peter W. Young.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Kolmos, A., & Edström, K. (2011). CDIO and PBL. In: Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference. Copenhagen: Technical University of Denmark, June 20–23, 2011.
Andersson, S. B., Malmqvist, J., Knutson Wedel, M., & Brodeur, D. B. (2005). A systematic approach to the design and implementation of design-build-test project courses. In Proceedings of ICED 05, Melbourne, Australia, 2005.
Svensson, T., & Krysander, C. (2011). Project model LIPS. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Malmqvist, J., Young, P. W., Hallström, S., & Svensson, T. (2004). Lessons learned from design-implement-test-based project courses. In Proceedings of the International Design Conference—Design 2004, Dubrovnik, May 18—21, 2004.
Taylor, D. G., Magleby, S. P., Todd, R. H., & Parkinson, A. R. (2001). Training faculty to coach capstone design teams. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17(4 and 5), 353–358.
Ertugrul, N. (2000). Towards virtual laboratories: A survey of Labview-based teaching/learning tools and future trends. International Journal of Engineering Education, 16(3), 171–180.
Kuhn, S. (2001). Learning from the architecture studio: Implications for project-based pedagogy. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17(4 and 5), 349–252.
Thompson, B. E. (2002). Studio pedagogy for engineering design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18(1), 39–49.
Dutta, D., Geister, D. E., & Tryggvason, G. (2004). Introducing hands-on experiences in design and manufacturing education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(5), 754–763.
McCarthy, M., Seidel, R., & Tedford, D. (2004). Developments in projects and multimedia-based learning in manufacturing systems engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(4), 536–542.
Crawley, E. F., Hallam, C. R. A., & Imrich, S. (2002). Engineering the engineering learning environment. Cambridge, MA: Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Hallström, S., & Kuttenkeuler, J. (2004). Experiences from a three-semester design-implement project course. Stockholm: The Royal Institute of Technology (KTH).
Young, P. W., Malmqvist, J., Hallström, S., Kuttenkeuler, J., Svensson, T., & Cunningham, G. C. (2005). Design and development of CDIO student workspaces—lessons learned. In Proceeding of the 2005 Annual Conference and Exhibition of the American Society of Engineering Education, Portland, Oregon, 2005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D.R., Edström, K. (2014). Design-Implement Experiences and Engineering Workspaces. In: Rethinking Engineering Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05560-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05561-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)