Assessment of Scientific and Innovative Projects: Mathematical Methods and Models for Management Decisions

  • Galim Mutanov
  • Gizat Abdykerova
  • Zhanna Yessengaliyeva
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 271)


To improve the quality of assessment of scientific and innovative projects the mathematical methods and models are developed in this article. Criteria and methods for assessing innovativeness and competitiveness are developed, along with a graphic model allowing visualization of project assessment in the coordinate scale of the matrix model. Innovation projects being objects of two interacting segments – science and business – are formalized as two-dimensional objects with the dependence K=f(I), where K is competitiveness and I is innovativeness. The proposed methodology facilitates complex project assessment on the basis of absolute positioning. This decision support methodology is designed to be utilized by expert commissions responsible for venture funds, development institutes, and other potential investors needing to select appropriate scientific and innovative projects.


scientific and innovative project innovation management ranking competitiveness innovativeness 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hochstrasser, B., Griffths, C.: Controlling IT Investment: Strategy and Management. Chapman & Hall, London (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Powell, W., Grodal, S.: Networks of Innovators. In: The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, vol. 29, pp. 56–85. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Christensen, C.: The Innovator’s Dilemma. Harvard Business School Press (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dereli, T., Altun, K.: A novel approach for assessment of technologies with respect to their innovation potentials. Expert Systems with Applications 40(3), 881–891 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Takalo, T., Tanayama, T., Toivanen, O.: Estimating the benefits of targeted R&D subsidies. Review of Economics and Statistics 95(1), 255–272 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Hemert, P., Nijkamp, P.: Knowledge investments, business R&D and innovativeness of countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77(3), 369–384 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sebora, T., Theerapatvong, T.: Corporate entrepreneurship: A test of external and internal influences on managers’ idea generation, risk taking, and proactiveness. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 6(3), 331–350 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Porter, M.: The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kurttila, M.: Non-industrial private forest owners’ attitudes towards the operational environment of forestry. Forest Policy and Economics 2(1), 13–28 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mutanov, G., Yessengaliyeva, Z.: Development of methods and models for assessing feasibility and cost-effectiveness of innovative projects. In: Proc. of Conf. SCIS-ISIS 2012, Kobe, Japan, pp. 2354–2357 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yin, R.: Case Study Research. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Galim Mutanov
    • 1
  • Gizat Abdykerova
    • 2
  • Zhanna Yessengaliyeva
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanics and Mathematicsal-Farabi Kazakh national universityAlmatyKazakhstan
  2. 2.Economics DepartmentD. Serikbayev East Kazakhstan state technical universityUst-KamenogorskKazakhstan

Personalised recommendations