Skip to main content

Crosscutting Issues in Treating the Fragmentation of Ecosystems and Landscapes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nature Policies and Landscape Policies

Part of the book series: Urban and Landscape Perspectives ((URBANLAND,volume 18))

  • 1214 Accesses

Abstract

Since the 1990s, many issues have emerged concerning fragmentation in nature and landscape studies. The dominance of the ecological standpoint in dealing with these problems emphasizes the importance of conserving ecosystems and biodiversity. Encompassing ecosystems and landscape fragmentation involves identifying several types of sizable systems. A landscape concept comprehensive of natural components, processes and dynamics, and the crosscutting integration of landscapes in the policies that affect them are the primary conditions for a “bridge” between nature-oriented policies and culture-oriented policies. Sustainable relationships among communities and their habitats can be developed through a comprehensive landscape-based planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antrop M (1998) Landscape change: plan or chaos? Landsc Urban Plan 41:155–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battisti C, Romano B (2007) Fragmentation and connectivity. From ecological analysis to environmental planning. CittàStudi, Novara

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissonette JA, David JL, Hargis CD (1998) The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landsc Ecol 13:167–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brancucci G, Gibelli G (eds) (2006) Planning uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the 7th national congress SIEP-IALE, Genoa, 30 Sept–1 Oct 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Carsjens GJ, van Lier HN (2002) Fragmentation and land-use planning. An introduction. Landsc Urban Plan 58(2–4):79–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collinge SK (1996) Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: implications for landscape architecture and planning. Landsc Urban Plan 36:59–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook EA, van Lier HN (eds) (1994) Landscape planning and ecological networks. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (2000) European Landscape Convention. Treaty series no 176. Florence

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming S, Vernier P (2002) Statistical models of landscape pattern metrics, with applications to regional scale dynamic forest simulations. Landsc Ecol 17:433–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson C (1998) Issues in measuring landscape fragmentation. Wildl Soc Bull 26(1):32–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Dramstad WE, Forman RTT, Olson JD (1996) Landscape ecology principles in landscape architecture and land use planning. Island Press/Harvard University Graduate school of Design/American society of Landscape architects, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbri P (2010) Paesaggio e reti. Ecologia della funzione e della percezione. Franco Angeli, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (1997) Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. J Wildl Manage 61(3):603–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics. The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambino R (2013) Foreword. In: Sargolini M (ed) Urban landscapes. Environmental networks and quality of life. Springer, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulinck H, Wagendorp T (2002) References for fragmentation analysis of the rural matrix in cultural landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 58(2–4):137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haila YA (2002) Conceptual genealogy of fragmentation research: from island biogeography to landscape ecology. Ecol Appl 12(2):321–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidding MC, Teunissen ATJ (2002) Beyond fragmentation: new concepts for urban–rural development. Landsc Urban Plan 58(2–4):297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger JAG (2000) Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation. Landsc Ecol 15:115–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kima J, Ellisb CD (2009) Determining the effects of local development regulations on landscape structure: comparison of the woodlands and North Houston, TX. Landsc Urban Plan 92(3–4):293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lina YP, Verburgb PH, Changc CR, Chena, Min-Hua Chena HY (2009) Developing and comparing optimal and empirical land-use models for the development of an urbanized watershed forest in Taiwan. Landsc Urban Plan 92(3–4):242–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHarg IL (1969) Design with nature. NHP, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nga CN, Xiea YJ, Yua XJ (2011) Measuring the spatio-temporal variation of habitat isolation due to rapid urbanization: a case study of the Shenzhen River cross-boundary catchment, China. Landsc Urban Plan 103(1):44–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olffa H, Ritchieb ME (2002) Fragmented nature: consequences for biodiversity. Landsc Urban Plan 58(2–4):83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osti G (2013) Afterword. In: Sargolini M (ed) Urban landscapes. Environmental networks and quality of life. Springer, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo D, Steiner F (2011) Urban ecological design. A process for regenerative places. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolinelli G (2003) Peri-urban landscape fragmentation. Project criteria for requalifying the Florentine plain. Firenze University Press, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolinelli G (2012) Landscape fragmentation: an interpretive project key. In: Falqui E et al (eds) Walking through landscapes. ETS, Pisa

    Google Scholar 

  • Poelmans L, van Rompaey A (2009) Detecting and modelling spatial patterns of urban sprawl in highly fragmented areas: a case study in the Flanders–Brussels region. Landsc Urban Plan 93(1):10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano B (2000) Environmental continuity. Planning for the ecological re-organization of territory. Andromeda, Colledara

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano B, Paolinelli G (2007) The interference of human settlements in eco-systemic structures. Models for the ecological network of the Veneto Region. Gangemi, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol 5:18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner F (1994) Costruire il paesaggio. McGraw Hill, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PD (2002) Fragmentation and cultural landscapes: tightening the relationship between human beings and the environments. Landsc Urban Plan 58(2–4):83–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox BA, Murphy DD (1985) Conservation strategy: the effects of fragmentation on extinction. Am Nat 125:879–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeha CT, Huangb SL (2009) Investigating spatiotemporal patterns of landscape diversity in response to urbanization. Landsc Urban Plan 93(3–4):151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young CH, Jarvis PJ (2001) Measuring urban habitat fragmentation: an example from the Black Country, UK. Landsc Ecol 16:643–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Paolinelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paolinelli, G. (2015). Crosscutting Issues in Treating the Fragmentation of Ecosystems and Landscapes. In: Gambino, R., Peano, A. (eds) Nature Policies and Landscape Policies. Urban and Landscape Perspectives, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05410-0_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics