Abstract
By the term “landscape”, I mean a technical device through which the modern subject tries to sketch its self-portrait. The subject I am talking about is cogito, mentioned in Descrates’ Second Metaphysics Meditation. On this matter, some fundamental clarifications need to be made. The cogito is neither the Ego, nor the res cogitans. It is rather the act of thinking itself, a thought that is thinking about what is actually being thought. According to William James, in order for the activity’s nature to be perceivable, it should be necessary to assign to cogito an impersonal subject, as it happens in the English expressions “it rains” or “it blows”. “As we cannot—concluded James—we simply must say that the thought goes on” [5]. Now, it will be objected that in landscapes there are no thoughts at all; rather than that, there are visual impressions as light, woods, rivers or valleys. “Thinking”, in the Cartesian sense of the term, does not mean anything but the consciousness’ intentionality. By the term “idea”, Descartes meant any form of intentional consciousness (any consciousness of something). Therefore, the action of observing is not only an intentional consciousness among others, but, considering the supremacy assigned by philosophy to the act of observing, it directly refers to the act of thinking, being its fundamental metaphor. To think means to contemplate, speculate, see. Therefore, if my hypothesis of landscape as the view’s self-portrait is valid, then it is also true that the landscape paintings tried to set up a special kind of mechanism, able to represent on canvas the anonymous act of thinking. This “modern” project entangles on an aporia that cannot help affecting those who question the creation of a possible “artificial” thought.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
On this matter, Raimond Ruyer has developed the concept of “absolute overflight” or “non-dimensional”, which has been used by Lacan in his seminar about the gaze.
References
Adorno, Th W.: Teoria Estetica. Einaudi, Torino, p. 88 (2009)
Bergson, H.: L’Énergie Spirituelle. In: Bergson H (1959) Oeuvres. Puf, Paris, p. 928 (1929)
Clark, K.: Landscape into Art. John Murray, London, p. 6, p. 74, p. 131, p. 23 (1962)
Gehlen, A.: Zeit-Bilder. Zur Soziologie und Ästhetik der Modern Malerei. Klostermann, Frankfurt, p. 34 (1986)
James, W.: Principles of psychology, pp. 224–225. Dover, New York (1890)
Lacan, J.: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book XI. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. W. W. Norton Company, London-New York, p. 67–123, p. 101 (1977)
Mach, E.: Analyse der Empfindungen. Gustav Fisher, Jena, p. 15 (1922)
Sartre, J-P.: Une idée fondamentale de la phénoménologie de Husserl: l’intentionnalité. In: Nouvelle Revue Française, 304, 129–131 (1939)
Wittgenstein, L.: Osservazioni filosofiche. Einaudi, Torino, p. 225 (1981)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ronchi, R. (2015). Landscape as a Device. In: Cocchiarella, L. (eds) The Visual Language of Technique. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05350-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05350-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05349-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05350-9
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)